Cargando…
Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock
BACKGROUND: VA-ECMO with concomitant Impella support (ECpella) is an emerging treatment modality for cardiogenic shock (CS). Survival outcomes by CS etiology with ECpella support have not been well-described. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with cardiogeni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293127 |
_version_ | 1785084828533653504 |
---|---|
author | Modi, Shan P. Hong, Yeahwa Sicke, McKenzie M. Hess, Nicholas R. Klass, Wyatt J. Ziegler, Luke A. Rivosecchi, Ryan M. Hickey, Gavin W. Kaczorowski, David J. Ramanan, Raj |
author_facet | Modi, Shan P. Hong, Yeahwa Sicke, McKenzie M. Hess, Nicholas R. Klass, Wyatt J. Ziegler, Luke A. Rivosecchi, Ryan M. Hickey, Gavin W. Kaczorowski, David J. Ramanan, Raj |
author_sort | Modi, Shan P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: VA-ECMO with concomitant Impella support (ECpella) is an emerging treatment modality for cardiogenic shock (CS). Survival outcomes by CS etiology with ECpella support have not been well-described. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) supported with ECpella from December 2020 to January 2023. Primary outcomes included 90-day survival post-discharge and destination after support. Secondary outcomes included complications post-ECpella support. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included (AMI-CS, n = 20, and ADHF-CS, n = 24). Patients with AMI-CS and ADHF-CS had similar survival 90 days post-discharge (p = .267) with similar destinations after ECpella support (p = .220). Limb ischemia and acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in patients presenting with AMI-CS (p=.013; p = .030). Patients with initial Impella support were more likely to survive ECpella support and be bridged to transplant (p=.033) and less likely to have a cerebrovascular accident (p=.016). Sub-analysis of ADHF-CS patients into acute-on-chronic decompensated heart failure and de novo heart failure demonstrated no difference in survival or destination. CONCLUSION: ECpella can be used to successfully manage patients with CS. There is no difference in survival or destination for AMI-CS and ADHF-CS in patients with ECpella support. Patients with initial Impella support are more likely to survive ECpella support and bridge to transplant. Future multicenter studies are required to fully analyze the differences between AMI-CS and ADHF-CS with ECpella support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10402237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104022372023-08-05 Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock Modi, Shan P. Hong, Yeahwa Sicke, McKenzie M. Hess, Nicholas R. Klass, Wyatt J. Ziegler, Luke A. Rivosecchi, Ryan M. Hickey, Gavin W. Kaczorowski, David J. Ramanan, Raj medRxiv Article BACKGROUND: VA-ECMO with concomitant Impella support (ECpella) is an emerging treatment modality for cardiogenic shock (CS). Survival outcomes by CS etiology with ECpella support have not been well-described. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) supported with ECpella from December 2020 to January 2023. Primary outcomes included 90-day survival post-discharge and destination after support. Secondary outcomes included complications post-ECpella support. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included (AMI-CS, n = 20, and ADHF-CS, n = 24). Patients with AMI-CS and ADHF-CS had similar survival 90 days post-discharge (p = .267) with similar destinations after ECpella support (p = .220). Limb ischemia and acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in patients presenting with AMI-CS (p=.013; p = .030). Patients with initial Impella support were more likely to survive ECpella support and be bridged to transplant (p=.033) and less likely to have a cerebrovascular accident (p=.016). Sub-analysis of ADHF-CS patients into acute-on-chronic decompensated heart failure and de novo heart failure demonstrated no difference in survival or destination. CONCLUSION: ECpella can be used to successfully manage patients with CS. There is no difference in survival or destination for AMI-CS and ADHF-CS in patients with ECpella support. Patients with initial Impella support are more likely to survive ECpella support and bridge to transplant. Future multicenter studies are required to fully analyze the differences between AMI-CS and ADHF-CS with ECpella support. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10402237/ /pubmed/37546750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293127 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. |
spellingShingle | Article Modi, Shan P. Hong, Yeahwa Sicke, McKenzie M. Hess, Nicholas R. Klass, Wyatt J. Ziegler, Luke A. Rivosecchi, Ryan M. Hickey, Gavin W. Kaczorowski, David J. Ramanan, Raj Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock |
title | Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock |
title_full | Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock |
title_fullStr | Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock |
title_full_unstemmed | Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock |
title_short | Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock |
title_sort | concomitant use of va-ecmo and impella support for cardiogenic shock |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT modishanp concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock AT hongyeahwa concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock AT sickemckenziem concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock AT hessnicholasr concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock AT klasswyattj concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock AT zieglerlukea concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock AT rivosecchiryanm concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock AT hickeygavinw concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock AT kaczorowskidavidj concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock AT ramananraj concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock |