Cargando…

Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock

BACKGROUND: VA-ECMO with concomitant Impella support (ECpella) is an emerging treatment modality for cardiogenic shock (CS). Survival outcomes by CS etiology with ECpella support have not been well-described. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with cardiogeni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Modi, Shan P., Hong, Yeahwa, Sicke, McKenzie M., Hess, Nicholas R., Klass, Wyatt J., Ziegler, Luke A., Rivosecchi, Ryan M., Hickey, Gavin W., Kaczorowski, David J., Ramanan, Raj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293127
_version_ 1785084828533653504
author Modi, Shan P.
Hong, Yeahwa
Sicke, McKenzie M.
Hess, Nicholas R.
Klass, Wyatt J.
Ziegler, Luke A.
Rivosecchi, Ryan M.
Hickey, Gavin W.
Kaczorowski, David J.
Ramanan, Raj
author_facet Modi, Shan P.
Hong, Yeahwa
Sicke, McKenzie M.
Hess, Nicholas R.
Klass, Wyatt J.
Ziegler, Luke A.
Rivosecchi, Ryan M.
Hickey, Gavin W.
Kaczorowski, David J.
Ramanan, Raj
author_sort Modi, Shan P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: VA-ECMO with concomitant Impella support (ECpella) is an emerging treatment modality for cardiogenic shock (CS). Survival outcomes by CS etiology with ECpella support have not been well-described. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) supported with ECpella from December 2020 to January 2023. Primary outcomes included 90-day survival post-discharge and destination after support. Secondary outcomes included complications post-ECpella support. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included (AMI-CS, n = 20, and ADHF-CS, n = 24). Patients with AMI-CS and ADHF-CS had similar survival 90 days post-discharge (p = .267) with similar destinations after ECpella support (p = .220). Limb ischemia and acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in patients presenting with AMI-CS (p=.013; p = .030). Patients with initial Impella support were more likely to survive ECpella support and be bridged to transplant (p=.033) and less likely to have a cerebrovascular accident (p=.016). Sub-analysis of ADHF-CS patients into acute-on-chronic decompensated heart failure and de novo heart failure demonstrated no difference in survival or destination. CONCLUSION: ECpella can be used to successfully manage patients with CS. There is no difference in survival or destination for AMI-CS and ADHF-CS in patients with ECpella support. Patients with initial Impella support are more likely to survive ECpella support and bridge to transplant. Future multicenter studies are required to fully analyze the differences between AMI-CS and ADHF-CS with ECpella support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10402237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104022372023-08-05 Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock Modi, Shan P. Hong, Yeahwa Sicke, McKenzie M. Hess, Nicholas R. Klass, Wyatt J. Ziegler, Luke A. Rivosecchi, Ryan M. Hickey, Gavin W. Kaczorowski, David J. Ramanan, Raj medRxiv Article BACKGROUND: VA-ECMO with concomitant Impella support (ECpella) is an emerging treatment modality for cardiogenic shock (CS). Survival outcomes by CS etiology with ECpella support have not been well-described. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) or decompensated heart failure (ADHF-CS) supported with ECpella from December 2020 to January 2023. Primary outcomes included 90-day survival post-discharge and destination after support. Secondary outcomes included complications post-ECpella support. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included (AMI-CS, n = 20, and ADHF-CS, n = 24). Patients with AMI-CS and ADHF-CS had similar survival 90 days post-discharge (p = .267) with similar destinations after ECpella support (p = .220). Limb ischemia and acute kidney injury occurred more frequently in patients presenting with AMI-CS (p=.013; p = .030). Patients with initial Impella support were more likely to survive ECpella support and be bridged to transplant (p=.033) and less likely to have a cerebrovascular accident (p=.016). Sub-analysis of ADHF-CS patients into acute-on-chronic decompensated heart failure and de novo heart failure demonstrated no difference in survival or destination. CONCLUSION: ECpella can be used to successfully manage patients with CS. There is no difference in survival or destination for AMI-CS and ADHF-CS in patients with ECpella support. Patients with initial Impella support are more likely to survive ECpella support and bridge to transplant. Future multicenter studies are required to fully analyze the differences between AMI-CS and ADHF-CS with ECpella support. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10402237/ /pubmed/37546750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293127 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Modi, Shan P.
Hong, Yeahwa
Sicke, McKenzie M.
Hess, Nicholas R.
Klass, Wyatt J.
Ziegler, Luke A.
Rivosecchi, Ryan M.
Hickey, Gavin W.
Kaczorowski, David J.
Ramanan, Raj
Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock
title Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock
title_full Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock
title_fullStr Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock
title_full_unstemmed Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock
title_short Concomitant Use of VA-ECMO and Impella Support for Cardiogenic Shock
title_sort concomitant use of va-ecmo and impella support for cardiogenic shock
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.24.23293127
work_keys_str_mv AT modishanp concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock
AT hongyeahwa concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock
AT sickemckenziem concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock
AT hessnicholasr concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock
AT klasswyattj concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock
AT zieglerlukea concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock
AT rivosecchiryanm concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock
AT hickeygavinw concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock
AT kaczorowskidavidj concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock
AT ramananraj concomitantuseofvaecmoandimpellasupportforcardiogenicshock