Cargando…

CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY

BACKGROUND: As regulators put more attention on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in oncology clinical trials, it is vital to understand patient preferences and motivation for completing PROs. We investigated preferences and motivations for symptom reporting and how this may differ between participan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khakwani, Saima, Dumais, Kelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402328/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad070.030
_version_ 1785084850916556800
author Khakwani, Saima
Dumais, Kelly
author_facet Khakwani, Saima
Dumais, Kelly
author_sort Khakwani, Saima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As regulators put more attention on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in oncology clinical trials, it is vital to understand patient preferences and motivation for completing PROs. We investigated preferences and motivations for symptom reporting and how this may differ between participants with cancer and with other chronic non-oncology diseases. METHODS: Participants completed an online survey focusing on preferences for using devices to report symptoms and what motivates them to complete PROs. Statistical analyses included a descriptive analysis of responses and Chi-Squared tests to examine differences between subgroups (oncology vs. participants with arthritis, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). RESULTS: Participants with cancer (N = 16) preferred using their own smartphone (31%) over going to a website (19%) or using a study-dedicated device (6%) to report symptoms, with 44% being happy with any option (44%). 88% of participants reported that receiving regular information to help manage their symptoms would motivate them the most to complete their PROs on a regular basis. Receiving a small financial compensation (81%) and knowing that their data was being reviewed by a healthcare professional (75%) were also strong motivators to complete PROs. The least preferred motivator was compensation in the form of charity donations (25%). Preference for reporting symptoms differed between subgroups (p=0.04), such that participants with cancer showed a higher preference for using their own smartphone compared to the non-oncology subgroup (N=30). The non-oncology subgroup was more likely to report notifications and alarms (p=0.04) as strategies that would encourage them to complete PROs. CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis suggests the importance of considering a range of symptom reporting strategies and the potential for tailoring strategies to fit patient preferences. The preference to use personal smartphones to report symptoms in participants with cancer suggests that a Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) strategy may be particularly suited for oncology clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10402328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104023282023-08-05 CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY Khakwani, Saima Dumais, Kelly Neurooncol Adv Final Category: Clinical Research Methods BACKGROUND: As regulators put more attention on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in oncology clinical trials, it is vital to understand patient preferences and motivation for completing PROs. We investigated preferences and motivations for symptom reporting and how this may differ between participants with cancer and with other chronic non-oncology diseases. METHODS: Participants completed an online survey focusing on preferences for using devices to report symptoms and what motivates them to complete PROs. Statistical analyses included a descriptive analysis of responses and Chi-Squared tests to examine differences between subgroups (oncology vs. participants with arthritis, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). RESULTS: Participants with cancer (N = 16) preferred using their own smartphone (31%) over going to a website (19%) or using a study-dedicated device (6%) to report symptoms, with 44% being happy with any option (44%). 88% of participants reported that receiving regular information to help manage their symptoms would motivate them the most to complete their PROs on a regular basis. Receiving a small financial compensation (81%) and knowing that their data was being reviewed by a healthcare professional (75%) were also strong motivators to complete PROs. The least preferred motivator was compensation in the form of charity donations (25%). Preference for reporting symptoms differed between subgroups (p=0.04), such that participants with cancer showed a higher preference for using their own smartphone compared to the non-oncology subgroup (N=30). The non-oncology subgroup was more likely to report notifications and alarms (p=0.04) as strategies that would encourage them to complete PROs. CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis suggests the importance of considering a range of symptom reporting strategies and the potential for tailoring strategies to fit patient preferences. The preference to use personal smartphones to report symptoms in participants with cancer suggests that a Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) strategy may be particularly suited for oncology clinical trials. Oxford University Press 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10402328/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad070.030 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Final Category: Clinical Research Methods
Khakwani, Saima
Dumais, Kelly
CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY
title CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY
title_full CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY
title_fullStr CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY
title_full_unstemmed CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY
title_short CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY
title_sort clrm-08 tailoring clinical trials to increase patient engagement: impact on patient-reported outcomes in oncology
topic Final Category: Clinical Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402328/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad070.030
work_keys_str_mv AT khakwanisaima clrm08tailoringclinicaltrialstoincreasepatientengagementimpactonpatientreportedoutcomesinoncology
AT dumaiskelly clrm08tailoringclinicaltrialstoincreasepatientengagementimpactonpatientreportedoutcomesinoncology