Cargando…
CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY
BACKGROUND: As regulators put more attention on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in oncology clinical trials, it is vital to understand patient preferences and motivation for completing PROs. We investigated preferences and motivations for symptom reporting and how this may differ between participan...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402328/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad070.030 |
_version_ | 1785084850916556800 |
---|---|
author | Khakwani, Saima Dumais, Kelly |
author_facet | Khakwani, Saima Dumais, Kelly |
author_sort | Khakwani, Saima |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As regulators put more attention on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in oncology clinical trials, it is vital to understand patient preferences and motivation for completing PROs. We investigated preferences and motivations for symptom reporting and how this may differ between participants with cancer and with other chronic non-oncology diseases. METHODS: Participants completed an online survey focusing on preferences for using devices to report symptoms and what motivates them to complete PROs. Statistical analyses included a descriptive analysis of responses and Chi-Squared tests to examine differences between subgroups (oncology vs. participants with arthritis, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). RESULTS: Participants with cancer (N = 16) preferred using their own smartphone (31%) over going to a website (19%) or using a study-dedicated device (6%) to report symptoms, with 44% being happy with any option (44%). 88% of participants reported that receiving regular information to help manage their symptoms would motivate them the most to complete their PROs on a regular basis. Receiving a small financial compensation (81%) and knowing that their data was being reviewed by a healthcare professional (75%) were also strong motivators to complete PROs. The least preferred motivator was compensation in the form of charity donations (25%). Preference for reporting symptoms differed between subgroups (p=0.04), such that participants with cancer showed a higher preference for using their own smartphone compared to the non-oncology subgroup (N=30). The non-oncology subgroup was more likely to report notifications and alarms (p=0.04) as strategies that would encourage them to complete PROs. CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis suggests the importance of considering a range of symptom reporting strategies and the potential for tailoring strategies to fit patient preferences. The preference to use personal smartphones to report symptoms in participants with cancer suggests that a Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) strategy may be particularly suited for oncology clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10402328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104023282023-08-05 CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY Khakwani, Saima Dumais, Kelly Neurooncol Adv Final Category: Clinical Research Methods BACKGROUND: As regulators put more attention on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in oncology clinical trials, it is vital to understand patient preferences and motivation for completing PROs. We investigated preferences and motivations for symptom reporting and how this may differ between participants with cancer and with other chronic non-oncology diseases. METHODS: Participants completed an online survey focusing on preferences for using devices to report symptoms and what motivates them to complete PROs. Statistical analyses included a descriptive analysis of responses and Chi-Squared tests to examine differences between subgroups (oncology vs. participants with arthritis, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). RESULTS: Participants with cancer (N = 16) preferred using their own smartphone (31%) over going to a website (19%) or using a study-dedicated device (6%) to report symptoms, with 44% being happy with any option (44%). 88% of participants reported that receiving regular information to help manage their symptoms would motivate them the most to complete their PROs on a regular basis. Receiving a small financial compensation (81%) and knowing that their data was being reviewed by a healthcare professional (75%) were also strong motivators to complete PROs. The least preferred motivator was compensation in the form of charity donations (25%). Preference for reporting symptoms differed between subgroups (p=0.04), such that participants with cancer showed a higher preference for using their own smartphone compared to the non-oncology subgroup (N=30). The non-oncology subgroup was more likely to report notifications and alarms (p=0.04) as strategies that would encourage them to complete PROs. CONCLUSION: This exploratory analysis suggests the importance of considering a range of symptom reporting strategies and the potential for tailoring strategies to fit patient preferences. The preference to use personal smartphones to report symptoms in participants with cancer suggests that a Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) strategy may be particularly suited for oncology clinical trials. Oxford University Press 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10402328/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad070.030 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Final Category: Clinical Research Methods Khakwani, Saima Dumais, Kelly CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY |
title | CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY |
title_full | CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY |
title_fullStr | CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY |
title_full_unstemmed | CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY |
title_short | CLRM-08 TAILORING CLINICAL TRIALS TO INCREASE PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: IMPACT ON PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN ONCOLOGY |
title_sort | clrm-08 tailoring clinical trials to increase patient engagement: impact on patient-reported outcomes in oncology |
topic | Final Category: Clinical Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402328/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad070.030 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khakwanisaima clrm08tailoringclinicaltrialstoincreasepatientengagementimpactonpatientreportedoutcomesinoncology AT dumaiskelly clrm08tailoringclinicaltrialstoincreasepatientengagementimpactonpatientreportedoutcomesinoncology |