Cargando…

LMAP-04 CHOOSING WISELY BETWEEN RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES: THE MOLECULAR GRADED PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT (MOLGPA) FOR ELDERLY GLIOBLASTOMA (EGBM-MOLGPA)

This study aimed develop a prognostic model integrating genomic characteristics in patients with elderly glioblastoma (eGBM), and compare the efficacy between conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) vs. hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT). Patients aged ≥65 years who underwent radiotherapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hye In, Kim, Jina, Kim, In Ah, Lee, Joo Ho, Cho, Jaeho, Yoon, Hong In, Wee, Chan Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402437/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad070.035
_version_ 1785084878104035328
author Lee, Hye In
Kim, Jina
Kim, In Ah
Lee, Joo Ho
Cho, Jaeho
Yoon, Hong In
Wee, Chan Woo
author_facet Lee, Hye In
Kim, Jina
Kim, In Ah
Lee, Joo Ho
Cho, Jaeho
Yoon, Hong In
Wee, Chan Woo
author_sort Lee, Hye In
collection PubMed
description This study aimed develop a prognostic model integrating genomic characteristics in patients with elderly glioblastoma (eGBM), and compare the efficacy between conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) vs. hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT). Patients aged ≥65 years who underwent radiotherapy for IDH-wildtype eGBM between 2006 and 2021 were included. Patients planned for a ≥6-week or ≤4-week radiotherapy were regarded as being treated with CFRT (334 patients; median, 60 Gy in 30 fractions) or HFRT (239 patients; median, 45 Gy in 15 fractions), respectively. We developed the molecular graded prognostic assessment score for eGBM (eGBM-molGPA) and assigned 0.0, 0.5, and 1.0 points in proportion to the corresponding hazard ratio (HR) of each prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). Temozolomide-based chemoradiation was applied for 86% of patients. With a median follow-up of 17.4 months, the median OS was 18.7 months for CFRT plus temozolomide group, 15.1 months for HFRT plus temozolomide group, and 10.4 months for RT alone group. The eGBM-molGPAwas established based on prognostic factors from multivariate analysis (performance, extent of resection, temozolomide, methylation of the MGMT promoter, subventricular zone involvement, temporalis muscle thickness, and the mutation status of TERT promoter and TP53 gene) and patients were allocated to three risk groups (high risk, total score 3.0–4.5; intermediate risk, 1.5–2.5; low risk, 0.0–1.0). Patients treated with CFRT plus temozolomide had significantly improved OS compared to those treated with HFRT plus temozolomide or radiotherapy alone in the low and intermediate risk groups (p<0.001). However, in the high-risk group, there was no significant difference in OS between treatment options. CFRT plus temozolomide can be a more effective strategy for selected eGBM patients compared to HFRT. For high-risk patients, a protracted treatment schedule might not be beneficial. The novel eGBM-molGPA can be used as a clinical tool for choosing wisely among radiotherapy options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10402437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104024372023-08-05 LMAP-04 CHOOSING WISELY BETWEEN RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES: THE MOLECULAR GRADED PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT (MOLGPA) FOR ELDERLY GLIOBLASTOMA (EGBM-MOLGPA) Lee, Hye In Kim, Jina Kim, In Ah Lee, Joo Ho Cho, Jaeho Yoon, Hong In Wee, Chan Woo Neurooncol Adv Final Category: Local and Multimodality Approaches This study aimed develop a prognostic model integrating genomic characteristics in patients with elderly glioblastoma (eGBM), and compare the efficacy between conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) vs. hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT). Patients aged ≥65 years who underwent radiotherapy for IDH-wildtype eGBM between 2006 and 2021 were included. Patients planned for a ≥6-week or ≤4-week radiotherapy were regarded as being treated with CFRT (334 patients; median, 60 Gy in 30 fractions) or HFRT (239 patients; median, 45 Gy in 15 fractions), respectively. We developed the molecular graded prognostic assessment score for eGBM (eGBM-molGPA) and assigned 0.0, 0.5, and 1.0 points in proportion to the corresponding hazard ratio (HR) of each prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). Temozolomide-based chemoradiation was applied for 86% of patients. With a median follow-up of 17.4 months, the median OS was 18.7 months for CFRT plus temozolomide group, 15.1 months for HFRT plus temozolomide group, and 10.4 months for RT alone group. The eGBM-molGPAwas established based on prognostic factors from multivariate analysis (performance, extent of resection, temozolomide, methylation of the MGMT promoter, subventricular zone involvement, temporalis muscle thickness, and the mutation status of TERT promoter and TP53 gene) and patients were allocated to three risk groups (high risk, total score 3.0–4.5; intermediate risk, 1.5–2.5; low risk, 0.0–1.0). Patients treated with CFRT plus temozolomide had significantly improved OS compared to those treated with HFRT plus temozolomide or radiotherapy alone in the low and intermediate risk groups (p<0.001). However, in the high-risk group, there was no significant difference in OS between treatment options. CFRT plus temozolomide can be a more effective strategy for selected eGBM patients compared to HFRT. For high-risk patients, a protracted treatment schedule might not be beneficial. The novel eGBM-molGPA can be used as a clinical tool for choosing wisely among radiotherapy options. Oxford University Press 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10402437/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad070.035 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Final Category: Local and Multimodality Approaches
Lee, Hye In
Kim, Jina
Kim, In Ah
Lee, Joo Ho
Cho, Jaeho
Yoon, Hong In
Wee, Chan Woo
LMAP-04 CHOOSING WISELY BETWEEN RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES: THE MOLECULAR GRADED PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT (MOLGPA) FOR ELDERLY GLIOBLASTOMA (EGBM-MOLGPA)
title LMAP-04 CHOOSING WISELY BETWEEN RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES: THE MOLECULAR GRADED PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT (MOLGPA) FOR ELDERLY GLIOBLASTOMA (EGBM-MOLGPA)
title_full LMAP-04 CHOOSING WISELY BETWEEN RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES: THE MOLECULAR GRADED PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT (MOLGPA) FOR ELDERLY GLIOBLASTOMA (EGBM-MOLGPA)
title_fullStr LMAP-04 CHOOSING WISELY BETWEEN RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES: THE MOLECULAR GRADED PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT (MOLGPA) FOR ELDERLY GLIOBLASTOMA (EGBM-MOLGPA)
title_full_unstemmed LMAP-04 CHOOSING WISELY BETWEEN RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES: THE MOLECULAR GRADED PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT (MOLGPA) FOR ELDERLY GLIOBLASTOMA (EGBM-MOLGPA)
title_short LMAP-04 CHOOSING WISELY BETWEEN RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-FRACTIONATION SCHEDULES: THE MOLECULAR GRADED PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT (MOLGPA) FOR ELDERLY GLIOBLASTOMA (EGBM-MOLGPA)
title_sort lmap-04 choosing wisely between radiotherapy dose-fractionation schedules: the molecular graded prognostic assessment (molgpa) for elderly glioblastoma (egbm-molgpa)
topic Final Category: Local and Multimodality Approaches
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402437/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad070.035
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyein lmap04choosingwiselybetweenradiotherapydosefractionationschedulesthemoleculargradedprognosticassessmentmolgpaforelderlyglioblastomaegbmmolgpa
AT kimjina lmap04choosingwiselybetweenradiotherapydosefractionationschedulesthemoleculargradedprognosticassessmentmolgpaforelderlyglioblastomaegbmmolgpa
AT kiminah lmap04choosingwiselybetweenradiotherapydosefractionationschedulesthemoleculargradedprognosticassessmentmolgpaforelderlyglioblastomaegbmmolgpa
AT leejooho lmap04choosingwiselybetweenradiotherapydosefractionationschedulesthemoleculargradedprognosticassessmentmolgpaforelderlyglioblastomaegbmmolgpa
AT chojaeho lmap04choosingwiselybetweenradiotherapydosefractionationschedulesthemoleculargradedprognosticassessmentmolgpaforelderlyglioblastomaegbmmolgpa
AT yoonhongin lmap04choosingwiselybetweenradiotherapydosefractionationschedulesthemoleculargradedprognosticassessmentmolgpaforelderlyglioblastomaegbmmolgpa
AT weechanwoo lmap04choosingwiselybetweenradiotherapydosefractionationschedulesthemoleculargradedprognosticassessmentmolgpaforelderlyglioblastomaegbmmolgpa