Cargando…

Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis

PURPOSE: Quality control (QC) is performed routinely through professional guidelines. However, the recommended QC frequency may not be optimal among different institutional settings. Here we propose a novel method for determining the optimal QC frequency using risk matrix (RM) analysis. METHODS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Min, Yan, Hui, Li, Minghui, Tian, Yuan, Zhang, Ke, Men, Kuo, Dai, Jianrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13984
_version_ 1785084896073482240
author Ma, Min
Yan, Hui
Li, Minghui
Tian, Yuan
Zhang, Ke
Men, Kuo
Dai, Jianrong
author_facet Ma, Min
Yan, Hui
Li, Minghui
Tian, Yuan
Zhang, Ke
Men, Kuo
Dai, Jianrong
author_sort Ma, Min
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Quality control (QC) is performed routinely through professional guidelines. However, the recommended QC frequency may not be optimal among different institutional settings. Here we propose a novel method for determining the optimal QC frequency using risk matrix (RM) analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A newly installed Magnetic Resonance linac (MR‐linac) was chosen as the testing platform and six routine QC items were investigated. Failures of these QC items can adversely affect treatment outcome for the patient. Accordingly, each QC item with its assigned frequency forms a unique failure mode (FM). Using FM‐effect analysis (FMEA), the severity (S), occurrence (O), and detection (D) of each FM was obtained. Next, S and D based on RM was used to determine the appropriate QC frequency. Finally, the performance of new frequency for each QC item was evaluated using the metric E = O/D. RESULTS: One new QC frequency was the same as the old frequency, two new QC frequencies were less than the old ones, and three new QC frequencies were higher than the old ones. For six QC items, E values at the new frequencies were not less than their values at the old frequencies. This indicates that the risk of machine failure is reduced at the new QC frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The application of RM analysis provides a useful tool for determining the optimal frequencies for routine linac QC. This study demonstrated that linac QC can be performed in a way that maintains high performance of the treatment machine in a radiotherapy clinic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10402679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104026792023-08-05 Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis Ma, Min Yan, Hui Li, Minghui Tian, Yuan Zhang, Ke Men, Kuo Dai, Jianrong J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Quality control (QC) is performed routinely through professional guidelines. However, the recommended QC frequency may not be optimal among different institutional settings. Here we propose a novel method for determining the optimal QC frequency using risk matrix (RM) analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A newly installed Magnetic Resonance linac (MR‐linac) was chosen as the testing platform and six routine QC items were investigated. Failures of these QC items can adversely affect treatment outcome for the patient. Accordingly, each QC item with its assigned frequency forms a unique failure mode (FM). Using FM‐effect analysis (FMEA), the severity (S), occurrence (O), and detection (D) of each FM was obtained. Next, S and D based on RM was used to determine the appropriate QC frequency. Finally, the performance of new frequency for each QC item was evaluated using the metric E = O/D. RESULTS: One new QC frequency was the same as the old frequency, two new QC frequencies were less than the old ones, and three new QC frequencies were higher than the old ones. For six QC items, E values at the new frequencies were not less than their values at the old frequencies. This indicates that the risk of machine failure is reduced at the new QC frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The application of RM analysis provides a useful tool for determining the optimal frequencies for routine linac QC. This study demonstrated that linac QC can be performed in a way that maintains high performance of the treatment machine in a radiotherapy clinic. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10402679/ /pubmed/37095706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13984 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Ma, Min
Yan, Hui
Li, Minghui
Tian, Yuan
Zhang, Ke
Men, Kuo
Dai, Jianrong
Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis
title Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis
title_full Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis
title_fullStr Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis
title_full_unstemmed Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis
title_short Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis
title_sort determining the quality control frequency of an mr‐linac using risk matrix (rm) analysis
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13984
work_keys_str_mv AT mamin determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis
AT yanhui determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis
AT liminghui determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis
AT tianyuan determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis
AT zhangke determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis
AT menkuo determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis
AT daijianrong determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis