Cargando…
Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis
PURPOSE: Quality control (QC) is performed routinely through professional guidelines. However, the recommended QC frequency may not be optimal among different institutional settings. Here we propose a novel method for determining the optimal QC frequency using risk matrix (RM) analysis. METHODS AND...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13984 |
_version_ | 1785084896073482240 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Min Yan, Hui Li, Minghui Tian, Yuan Zhang, Ke Men, Kuo Dai, Jianrong |
author_facet | Ma, Min Yan, Hui Li, Minghui Tian, Yuan Zhang, Ke Men, Kuo Dai, Jianrong |
author_sort | Ma, Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Quality control (QC) is performed routinely through professional guidelines. However, the recommended QC frequency may not be optimal among different institutional settings. Here we propose a novel method for determining the optimal QC frequency using risk matrix (RM) analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A newly installed Magnetic Resonance linac (MR‐linac) was chosen as the testing platform and six routine QC items were investigated. Failures of these QC items can adversely affect treatment outcome for the patient. Accordingly, each QC item with its assigned frequency forms a unique failure mode (FM). Using FM‐effect analysis (FMEA), the severity (S), occurrence (O), and detection (D) of each FM was obtained. Next, S and D based on RM was used to determine the appropriate QC frequency. Finally, the performance of new frequency for each QC item was evaluated using the metric E = O/D. RESULTS: One new QC frequency was the same as the old frequency, two new QC frequencies were less than the old ones, and three new QC frequencies were higher than the old ones. For six QC items, E values at the new frequencies were not less than their values at the old frequencies. This indicates that the risk of machine failure is reduced at the new QC frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The application of RM analysis provides a useful tool for determining the optimal frequencies for routine linac QC. This study demonstrated that linac QC can be performed in a way that maintains high performance of the treatment machine in a radiotherapy clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10402679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104026792023-08-05 Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis Ma, Min Yan, Hui Li, Minghui Tian, Yuan Zhang, Ke Men, Kuo Dai, Jianrong J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Quality control (QC) is performed routinely through professional guidelines. However, the recommended QC frequency may not be optimal among different institutional settings. Here we propose a novel method for determining the optimal QC frequency using risk matrix (RM) analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A newly installed Magnetic Resonance linac (MR‐linac) was chosen as the testing platform and six routine QC items were investigated. Failures of these QC items can adversely affect treatment outcome for the patient. Accordingly, each QC item with its assigned frequency forms a unique failure mode (FM). Using FM‐effect analysis (FMEA), the severity (S), occurrence (O), and detection (D) of each FM was obtained. Next, S and D based on RM was used to determine the appropriate QC frequency. Finally, the performance of new frequency for each QC item was evaluated using the metric E = O/D. RESULTS: One new QC frequency was the same as the old frequency, two new QC frequencies were less than the old ones, and three new QC frequencies were higher than the old ones. For six QC items, E values at the new frequencies were not less than their values at the old frequencies. This indicates that the risk of machine failure is reduced at the new QC frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The application of RM analysis provides a useful tool for determining the optimal frequencies for routine linac QC. This study demonstrated that linac QC can be performed in a way that maintains high performance of the treatment machine in a radiotherapy clinic. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10402679/ /pubmed/37095706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13984 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Ma, Min Yan, Hui Li, Minghui Tian, Yuan Zhang, Ke Men, Kuo Dai, Jianrong Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis |
title | Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis |
title_full | Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis |
title_fullStr | Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis |
title_short | Determining the quality control frequency of an MR‐linac using risk matrix (RM) analysis |
title_sort | determining the quality control frequency of an mr‐linac using risk matrix (rm) analysis |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13984 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mamin determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis AT yanhui determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis AT liminghui determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis AT tianyuan determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis AT zhangke determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis AT menkuo determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis AT daijianrong determiningthequalitycontrolfrequencyofanmrlinacusingriskmatrixrmanalysis |