Cargando…

COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021

Vaccine hesitancy is an ongoing barrier to achieve sufficient COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Although there are many studies globally of vaccine hesitancy based on large survey samples, there are fewer in-depth qualitative studies that explore vaccine hesitancy and acceptance as a spectrum of decisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eichelberger, Laura, Hansen, Amanda, Cochran, Patricia, Hahn, Micah, Fried, Ruby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37535846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2023.2242582
_version_ 1785084930295857152
author Eichelberger, Laura
Hansen, Amanda
Cochran, Patricia
Hahn, Micah
Fried, Ruby
author_facet Eichelberger, Laura
Hansen, Amanda
Cochran, Patricia
Hahn, Micah
Fried, Ruby
author_sort Eichelberger, Laura
collection PubMed
description Vaccine hesitancy is an ongoing barrier to achieve sufficient COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Although there are many studies globally of vaccine hesitancy based on large survey samples, there are fewer in-depth qualitative studies that explore vaccine hesitancy and acceptance as a spectrum of decision-making. In this paper, we begin to describe vaccination decision-making among 58 adults living in remote Alaska based on three waves of online surveys and follow-up semi-structured interviews conducted between November 2020 and November 2021. The survey question of intention was not a predictor of adoption for about one third of the interviewees who were unvaccinated when they took the survey (n=12, 35%). Over half of all interviewees (n=37, 64%) had vaccine-related concerns, including 25 vaccinated individuals (representing 57% of vaccinated interviewees). Most interviewees reported that they learned about COVID-19 vaccines through interpersonal interactions (n=30, 52%) and/or a variety of media sources (n=29, 50%). The major facilitators of acceptance were trust in the information source (n=20, 48% of the 42 who responded), and learning from the experiences of family, friends, and the broader community (n=12, 29%). Further, trust and having a sense of agency appears to be important to interviewee decision-making, regardless of vaccination status and intention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10402834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104028342023-08-05 COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021 Eichelberger, Laura Hansen, Amanda Cochran, Patricia Hahn, Micah Fried, Ruby Int J Circumpolar Health Original Research Article Vaccine hesitancy is an ongoing barrier to achieve sufficient COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Although there are many studies globally of vaccine hesitancy based on large survey samples, there are fewer in-depth qualitative studies that explore vaccine hesitancy and acceptance as a spectrum of decision-making. In this paper, we begin to describe vaccination decision-making among 58 adults living in remote Alaska based on three waves of online surveys and follow-up semi-structured interviews conducted between November 2020 and November 2021. The survey question of intention was not a predictor of adoption for about one third of the interviewees who were unvaccinated when they took the survey (n=12, 35%). Over half of all interviewees (n=37, 64%) had vaccine-related concerns, including 25 vaccinated individuals (representing 57% of vaccinated interviewees). Most interviewees reported that they learned about COVID-19 vaccines through interpersonal interactions (n=30, 52%) and/or a variety of media sources (n=29, 50%). The major facilitators of acceptance were trust in the information source (n=20, 48% of the 42 who responded), and learning from the experiences of family, friends, and the broader community (n=12, 29%). Further, trust and having a sense of agency appears to be important to interviewee decision-making, regardless of vaccination status and intention. Taylor & Francis 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10402834/ /pubmed/37535846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2023.2242582 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Eichelberger, Laura
Hansen, Amanda
Cochran, Patricia
Hahn, Micah
Fried, Ruby
COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021
title COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021
title_full COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021
title_fullStr COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021
title_short COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021
title_sort covid-19 vaccine decision-making in remote alaska between november 2020 and november 2021
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37535846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2023.2242582
work_keys_str_mv AT eichelbergerlaura covid19vaccinedecisionmakinginremotealaskabetweennovember2020andnovember2021
AT hansenamanda covid19vaccinedecisionmakinginremotealaskabetweennovember2020andnovember2021
AT cochranpatricia covid19vaccinedecisionmakinginremotealaskabetweennovember2020andnovember2021
AT hahnmicah covid19vaccinedecisionmakinginremotealaskabetweennovember2020andnovember2021
AT friedruby covid19vaccinedecisionmakinginremotealaskabetweennovember2020andnovember2021