Cargando…
COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021
Vaccine hesitancy is an ongoing barrier to achieve sufficient COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Although there are many studies globally of vaccine hesitancy based on large survey samples, there are fewer in-depth qualitative studies that explore vaccine hesitancy and acceptance as a spectrum of decisi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37535846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2023.2242582 |
_version_ | 1785084930295857152 |
---|---|
author | Eichelberger, Laura Hansen, Amanda Cochran, Patricia Hahn, Micah Fried, Ruby |
author_facet | Eichelberger, Laura Hansen, Amanda Cochran, Patricia Hahn, Micah Fried, Ruby |
author_sort | Eichelberger, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vaccine hesitancy is an ongoing barrier to achieve sufficient COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Although there are many studies globally of vaccine hesitancy based on large survey samples, there are fewer in-depth qualitative studies that explore vaccine hesitancy and acceptance as a spectrum of decision-making. In this paper, we begin to describe vaccination decision-making among 58 adults living in remote Alaska based on three waves of online surveys and follow-up semi-structured interviews conducted between November 2020 and November 2021. The survey question of intention was not a predictor of adoption for about one third of the interviewees who were unvaccinated when they took the survey (n=12, 35%). Over half of all interviewees (n=37, 64%) had vaccine-related concerns, including 25 vaccinated individuals (representing 57% of vaccinated interviewees). Most interviewees reported that they learned about COVID-19 vaccines through interpersonal interactions (n=30, 52%) and/or a variety of media sources (n=29, 50%). The major facilitators of acceptance were trust in the information source (n=20, 48% of the 42 who responded), and learning from the experiences of family, friends, and the broader community (n=12, 29%). Further, trust and having a sense of agency appears to be important to interviewee decision-making, regardless of vaccination status and intention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10402834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104028342023-08-05 COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021 Eichelberger, Laura Hansen, Amanda Cochran, Patricia Hahn, Micah Fried, Ruby Int J Circumpolar Health Original Research Article Vaccine hesitancy is an ongoing barrier to achieve sufficient COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Although there are many studies globally of vaccine hesitancy based on large survey samples, there are fewer in-depth qualitative studies that explore vaccine hesitancy and acceptance as a spectrum of decision-making. In this paper, we begin to describe vaccination decision-making among 58 adults living in remote Alaska based on three waves of online surveys and follow-up semi-structured interviews conducted between November 2020 and November 2021. The survey question of intention was not a predictor of adoption for about one third of the interviewees who were unvaccinated when they took the survey (n=12, 35%). Over half of all interviewees (n=37, 64%) had vaccine-related concerns, including 25 vaccinated individuals (representing 57% of vaccinated interviewees). Most interviewees reported that they learned about COVID-19 vaccines through interpersonal interactions (n=30, 52%) and/or a variety of media sources (n=29, 50%). The major facilitators of acceptance were trust in the information source (n=20, 48% of the 42 who responded), and learning from the experiences of family, friends, and the broader community (n=12, 29%). Further, trust and having a sense of agency appears to be important to interviewee decision-making, regardless of vaccination status and intention. Taylor & Francis 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10402834/ /pubmed/37535846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2023.2242582 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Eichelberger, Laura Hansen, Amanda Cochran, Patricia Hahn, Micah Fried, Ruby COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021 |
title | COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021 |
title_full | COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021 |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021 |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021 |
title_short | COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in remote Alaska between November 2020 and November 2021 |
title_sort | covid-19 vaccine decision-making in remote alaska between november 2020 and november 2021 |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37535846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2023.2242582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eichelbergerlaura covid19vaccinedecisionmakinginremotealaskabetweennovember2020andnovember2021 AT hansenamanda covid19vaccinedecisionmakinginremotealaskabetweennovember2020andnovember2021 AT cochranpatricia covid19vaccinedecisionmakinginremotealaskabetweennovember2020andnovember2021 AT hahnmicah covid19vaccinedecisionmakinginremotealaskabetweennovember2020andnovember2021 AT friedruby covid19vaccinedecisionmakinginremotealaskabetweennovember2020andnovember2021 |