Cargando…

A real-world comparison of the clinical and economic utility of OVA1 and CA125 in assessing ovarian tumor malignancy risk

AIMS: This largest-of-its-kind study evaluated the clinical utility of CA125 and OVA1, commonly used as ovarian tumor markers for assessing the risk of malignancy. The research focused on the ability and utility of these tests to reliably predict patients at low risk for ovarian cancer. Clinical uti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reilly, Gerard P, Gregory, David A, Scotti, Dennis J, Lederman, Samuel, Neiman, Wade A, Sussman, Steven, M Bean, Lisa, Ekono, Mercedes M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Becaris Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37212790
http://dx.doi.org/10.57264/cer-2023-0025
_version_ 1785084944832266240
author Reilly, Gerard P
Gregory, David A
Scotti, Dennis J
Lederman, Samuel
Neiman, Wade A
Sussman, Steven
M Bean, Lisa
Ekono, Mercedes M
author_facet Reilly, Gerard P
Gregory, David A
Scotti, Dennis J
Lederman, Samuel
Neiman, Wade A
Sussman, Steven
M Bean, Lisa
Ekono, Mercedes M
author_sort Reilly, Gerard P
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This largest-of-its-kind study evaluated the clinical utility of CA125 and OVA1, commonly used as ovarian tumor markers for assessing the risk of malignancy. The research focused on the ability and utility of these tests to reliably predict patients at low risk for ovarian cancer. Clinical utility endpoints were 12-month maintenance of benign mass status, reduction in gynecologic oncologist referral, avoidable surgical intervention and associated cost savings. MATERIALS & METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review of data from electronic medical records and administrative claims databases. Patients receiving a CA125 or OVA1 test between October 2018 and September 2020 were identified and followed for 12 months using site-specific electronic medical records to assess tumor status and utilization outcomes. Propensity score adjustment was used to control for confounding variables. Payer allowed amounts from Merative MarketScan Research Databases were used to estimate 12-month episode-of-care costs per patient, including surgery and other interventions. RESULTS: Among 290 low-risk OVA1 patients, 99.0% remained benign for 12 months compared with 97.2% of 181 low-risk CA125 patients. The OVA1 cohort exhibited 75% lower odds of surgical intervention in the overall sample of patients (Adjusted OR: 0.251, p ≤ 0.0001), and 63% lower odds of gynecologic oncologist utilization among premenopausal women (Adjusted OR: 0.37, p = 0.0390) versus CA125. OVA1 demonstrated significant savings in surgical interventions ($2486, p ≤ 0.0001) and total episode-of-care costs ($2621, p ≤ 0.0001) versus CA125. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the utility of a reliably predictive multivariate assay for assessing ovarian cancer risk. For patients assessed at low risk of ovarian tumor malignancy, OVA1 is associated with a significant reduction in avoidable surgeries and substantial cost savings per patient. OVA1 is also associated with a significant reduction in subspecialty referrals for low-risk premenopausal patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10402905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Becaris Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104029052023-08-11 A real-world comparison of the clinical and economic utility of OVA1 and CA125 in assessing ovarian tumor malignancy risk Reilly, Gerard P Gregory, David A Scotti, Dennis J Lederman, Samuel Neiman, Wade A Sussman, Steven M Bean, Lisa Ekono, Mercedes M J Comp Eff Res Research Article AIMS: This largest-of-its-kind study evaluated the clinical utility of CA125 and OVA1, commonly used as ovarian tumor markers for assessing the risk of malignancy. The research focused on the ability and utility of these tests to reliably predict patients at low risk for ovarian cancer. Clinical utility endpoints were 12-month maintenance of benign mass status, reduction in gynecologic oncologist referral, avoidable surgical intervention and associated cost savings. MATERIALS & METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review of data from electronic medical records and administrative claims databases. Patients receiving a CA125 or OVA1 test between October 2018 and September 2020 were identified and followed for 12 months using site-specific electronic medical records to assess tumor status and utilization outcomes. Propensity score adjustment was used to control for confounding variables. Payer allowed amounts from Merative MarketScan Research Databases were used to estimate 12-month episode-of-care costs per patient, including surgery and other interventions. RESULTS: Among 290 low-risk OVA1 patients, 99.0% remained benign for 12 months compared with 97.2% of 181 low-risk CA125 patients. The OVA1 cohort exhibited 75% lower odds of surgical intervention in the overall sample of patients (Adjusted OR: 0.251, p ≤ 0.0001), and 63% lower odds of gynecologic oncologist utilization among premenopausal women (Adjusted OR: 0.37, p = 0.0390) versus CA125. OVA1 demonstrated significant savings in surgical interventions ($2486, p ≤ 0.0001) and total episode-of-care costs ($2621, p ≤ 0.0001) versus CA125. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the utility of a reliably predictive multivariate assay for assessing ovarian cancer risk. For patients assessed at low risk of ovarian tumor malignancy, OVA1 is associated with a significant reduction in avoidable surgeries and substantial cost savings per patient. OVA1 is also associated with a significant reduction in subspecialty referrals for low-risk premenopausal patients. Becaris Publishing Ltd 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10402905/ /pubmed/37212790 http://dx.doi.org/10.57264/cer-2023-0025 Text en © 2023 The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Article
Reilly, Gerard P
Gregory, David A
Scotti, Dennis J
Lederman, Samuel
Neiman, Wade A
Sussman, Steven
M Bean, Lisa
Ekono, Mercedes M
A real-world comparison of the clinical and economic utility of OVA1 and CA125 in assessing ovarian tumor malignancy risk
title A real-world comparison of the clinical and economic utility of OVA1 and CA125 in assessing ovarian tumor malignancy risk
title_full A real-world comparison of the clinical and economic utility of OVA1 and CA125 in assessing ovarian tumor malignancy risk
title_fullStr A real-world comparison of the clinical and economic utility of OVA1 and CA125 in assessing ovarian tumor malignancy risk
title_full_unstemmed A real-world comparison of the clinical and economic utility of OVA1 and CA125 in assessing ovarian tumor malignancy risk
title_short A real-world comparison of the clinical and economic utility of OVA1 and CA125 in assessing ovarian tumor malignancy risk
title_sort real-world comparison of the clinical and economic utility of ova1 and ca125 in assessing ovarian tumor malignancy risk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37212790
http://dx.doi.org/10.57264/cer-2023-0025
work_keys_str_mv AT reillygerardp arealworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT gregorydavida arealworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT scottidennisj arealworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT ledermansamuel arealworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT neimanwadea arealworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT sussmansteven arealworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT mbeanlisa arealworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT ekonomercedesm arealworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT reillygerardp realworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT gregorydavida realworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT scottidennisj realworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT ledermansamuel realworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT neimanwadea realworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT sussmansteven realworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT mbeanlisa realworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk
AT ekonomercedesm realworldcomparisonoftheclinicalandeconomicutilityofova1andca125inassessingovariantumormalignancyrisk