Cargando…

Network meta-analysis for indirect comparison of lanadelumab and berotralstat for the treatment of hereditary angioedema

AIMS: With no head-to-head studies comparing the effectiveness of lanadelumab and berotralstat for prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to indirectly compare the effectiveness of these treatments. MATERIALS & METHODS: The NMA, using the publis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watt, Maureen, Malmenäs, Mia, Romanus, Dorothy, Haeussler, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Becaris Publishing Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37218553
http://dx.doi.org/10.57264/cer-2022-0188
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: With no head-to-head studies comparing the effectiveness of lanadelumab and berotralstat for prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to indirectly compare the effectiveness of these treatments. MATERIALS & METHODS: The NMA, using the published data from Phase III trials, was performed using a frequentist weighted regression-based approach following Rücker et al. Efficacy outcomes of interest were HAE attack rate per 28 days and ≥90% reduction in monthly HAE attacks. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: In this NMA, lanadelumab 300 mg administered every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks was associated with statistically significantly higher effectiveness versus berotralstat 150 mg once daily (q.d.) or 110 mg q.d. for both efficacy outcomes assessed.