Cargando…
Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool
The involvement of pediatric imaging professionals in quality improvement (QI) in our department was low, with few available informatics tools to report issues or suggest improvement opportunities in a timely and efficient manner. We aimed to increase QI engagement in radiology by creating a real-ti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37551257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000673 |
_version_ | 1785084952810881024 |
---|---|
author | Ruess, Lynne Thompson, Benjamin P. Mesi, Erin L. Chmil, Margarita Zumberge, Nicholas A. Jorgenson, Kari Krishnamurthy, Rajesh |
author_facet | Ruess, Lynne Thompson, Benjamin P. Mesi, Erin L. Chmil, Margarita Zumberge, Nicholas A. Jorgenson, Kari Krishnamurthy, Rajesh |
author_sort | Ruess, Lynne |
collection | PubMed |
description | The involvement of pediatric imaging professionals in quality improvement (QI) in our department was low, with few available informatics tools to report issues or suggest improvement opportunities in a timely and efficient manner. We aimed to increase QI engagement in radiology by creating a real-time, encounter-specific reporting tool embedded into the clinical imaging workflow. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team outlined requirements for a new electronic quality-reporting tool, including point-of-care access during imaging workflow and simultaneous automatic capture of encounter-specific clinical information from the hospital information system. Information system experts created a user-friendly interface for categories based on stages of imaging workflow (Planning, Acquisition, Processing, Interpretation, Communication, and Data Collection). Team members trained all department staff. Quality coordinators sorted entries and monitored personnel engagement for two 36-week periods: immediately after launch and 3 years later. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze proposed and completed QI projects during these periods. RESULTS: There were 1,498 entries during the first 36 weeks. Ninety-three percent of radiologists and 56% of technologists participated. Three years later, there were 1,251 entries in 36 weeks. Data collection entries for established QI projects increased from 380 (25%) to 487(39%). The engagement continued among radiologists but decreased among technologists over time. Submissions for QI projects increased from baseline. The project completion rate increased. CONCLUSION: We created a QI reporting tool embedded into the clinical imaging workflow, which improved the participation of our imaging professionals and increased the number of completed QI projects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10402949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104029492023-08-07 Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool Ruess, Lynne Thompson, Benjamin P. Mesi, Erin L. Chmil, Margarita Zumberge, Nicholas A. Jorgenson, Kari Krishnamurthy, Rajesh Pediatr Qual Saf Individual QI projects from single institutions The involvement of pediatric imaging professionals in quality improvement (QI) in our department was low, with few available informatics tools to report issues or suggest improvement opportunities in a timely and efficient manner. We aimed to increase QI engagement in radiology by creating a real-time, encounter-specific reporting tool embedded into the clinical imaging workflow. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team outlined requirements for a new electronic quality-reporting tool, including point-of-care access during imaging workflow and simultaneous automatic capture of encounter-specific clinical information from the hospital information system. Information system experts created a user-friendly interface for categories based on stages of imaging workflow (Planning, Acquisition, Processing, Interpretation, Communication, and Data Collection). Team members trained all department staff. Quality coordinators sorted entries and monitored personnel engagement for two 36-week periods: immediately after launch and 3 years later. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze proposed and completed QI projects during these periods. RESULTS: There were 1,498 entries during the first 36 weeks. Ninety-three percent of radiologists and 56% of technologists participated. Three years later, there were 1,251 entries in 36 weeks. Data collection entries for established QI projects increased from 380 (25%) to 487(39%). The engagement continued among radiologists but decreased among technologists over time. Submissions for QI projects increased from baseline. The project completion rate increased. CONCLUSION: We created a QI reporting tool embedded into the clinical imaging workflow, which improved the participation of our imaging professionals and increased the number of completed QI projects. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10402949/ /pubmed/37551257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000673 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Individual QI projects from single institutions Ruess, Lynne Thompson, Benjamin P. Mesi, Erin L. Chmil, Margarita Zumberge, Nicholas A. Jorgenson, Kari Krishnamurthy, Rajesh Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool |
title | Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool |
title_full | Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool |
title_fullStr | Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool |
title_short | Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool |
title_sort | increasing engagement of imaging professionals in quality improvement using an encounter-specific quality-reporting tool |
topic | Individual QI projects from single institutions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37551257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000673 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruesslynne increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool AT thompsonbenjaminp increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool AT mesierinl increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool AT chmilmargarita increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool AT zumbergenicholasa increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool AT jorgensonkari increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool AT krishnamurthyrajesh increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool |