Cargando…

Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool

The involvement of pediatric imaging professionals in quality improvement (QI) in our department was low, with few available informatics tools to report issues or suggest improvement opportunities in a timely and efficient manner. We aimed to increase QI engagement in radiology by creating a real-ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruess, Lynne, Thompson, Benjamin P., Mesi, Erin L., Chmil, Margarita, Zumberge, Nicholas A., Jorgenson, Kari, Krishnamurthy, Rajesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37551257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000673
_version_ 1785084952810881024
author Ruess, Lynne
Thompson, Benjamin P.
Mesi, Erin L.
Chmil, Margarita
Zumberge, Nicholas A.
Jorgenson, Kari
Krishnamurthy, Rajesh
author_facet Ruess, Lynne
Thompson, Benjamin P.
Mesi, Erin L.
Chmil, Margarita
Zumberge, Nicholas A.
Jorgenson, Kari
Krishnamurthy, Rajesh
author_sort Ruess, Lynne
collection PubMed
description The involvement of pediatric imaging professionals in quality improvement (QI) in our department was low, with few available informatics tools to report issues or suggest improvement opportunities in a timely and efficient manner. We aimed to increase QI engagement in radiology by creating a real-time, encounter-specific reporting tool embedded into the clinical imaging workflow. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team outlined requirements for a new electronic quality-reporting tool, including point-of-care access during imaging workflow and simultaneous automatic capture of encounter-specific clinical information from the hospital information system. Information system experts created a user-friendly interface for categories based on stages of imaging workflow (Planning, Acquisition, Processing, Interpretation, Communication, and Data Collection). Team members trained all department staff. Quality coordinators sorted entries and monitored personnel engagement for two 36-week periods: immediately after launch and 3 years later. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze proposed and completed QI projects during these periods. RESULTS: There were 1,498 entries during the first 36 weeks. Ninety-three percent of radiologists and 56% of technologists participated. Three years later, there were 1,251 entries in 36 weeks. Data collection entries for established QI projects increased from 380 (25%) to 487(39%). The engagement continued among radiologists but decreased among technologists over time. Submissions for QI projects increased from baseline. The project completion rate increased. CONCLUSION: We created a QI reporting tool embedded into the clinical imaging workflow, which improved the participation of our imaging professionals and increased the number of completed QI projects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10402949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104029492023-08-07 Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool Ruess, Lynne Thompson, Benjamin P. Mesi, Erin L. Chmil, Margarita Zumberge, Nicholas A. Jorgenson, Kari Krishnamurthy, Rajesh Pediatr Qual Saf Individual QI projects from single institutions The involvement of pediatric imaging professionals in quality improvement (QI) in our department was low, with few available informatics tools to report issues or suggest improvement opportunities in a timely and efficient manner. We aimed to increase QI engagement in radiology by creating a real-time, encounter-specific reporting tool embedded into the clinical imaging workflow. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team outlined requirements for a new electronic quality-reporting tool, including point-of-care access during imaging workflow and simultaneous automatic capture of encounter-specific clinical information from the hospital information system. Information system experts created a user-friendly interface for categories based on stages of imaging workflow (Planning, Acquisition, Processing, Interpretation, Communication, and Data Collection). Team members trained all department staff. Quality coordinators sorted entries and monitored personnel engagement for two 36-week periods: immediately after launch and 3 years later. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze proposed and completed QI projects during these periods. RESULTS: There were 1,498 entries during the first 36 weeks. Ninety-three percent of radiologists and 56% of technologists participated. Three years later, there were 1,251 entries in 36 weeks. Data collection entries for established QI projects increased from 380 (25%) to 487(39%). The engagement continued among radiologists but decreased among technologists over time. Submissions for QI projects increased from baseline. The project completion rate increased. CONCLUSION: We created a QI reporting tool embedded into the clinical imaging workflow, which improved the participation of our imaging professionals and increased the number of completed QI projects. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10402949/ /pubmed/37551257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000673 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Individual QI projects from single institutions
Ruess, Lynne
Thompson, Benjamin P.
Mesi, Erin L.
Chmil, Margarita
Zumberge, Nicholas A.
Jorgenson, Kari
Krishnamurthy, Rajesh
Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool
title Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool
title_full Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool
title_fullStr Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool
title_full_unstemmed Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool
title_short Increasing Engagement of Imaging Professionals in Quality Improvement Using an Encounter-specific Quality-reporting Tool
title_sort increasing engagement of imaging professionals in quality improvement using an encounter-specific quality-reporting tool
topic Individual QI projects from single institutions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10402949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37551257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000673
work_keys_str_mv AT ruesslynne increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool
AT thompsonbenjaminp increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool
AT mesierinl increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool
AT chmilmargarita increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool
AT zumbergenicholasa increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool
AT jorgensonkari increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool
AT krishnamurthyrajesh increasingengagementofimagingprofessionalsinqualityimprovementusinganencounterspecificqualityreportingtool