Cargando…

Technology and Tool Development for BACPAC: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Accelerated Lumbar Spine MRI with Deep-Learning Based Image Reconstruction at 3T

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether combining fast acquisitions with deep-learning reconstruction can provide diagnostically useful images and quantitative assessment comparable to standard-of-care acquisitions for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Eighteen patients were imaged wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Misung, Bahroos, Emma, Hess, Madeline E, Chin, Cynthia T, Gao, Kenneth T, Shin, David D, Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E, Link, Thomas M, Pedoia, Valentina, Majumdar, Sharmila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36943371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnad035
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether combining fast acquisitions with deep-learning reconstruction can provide diagnostically useful images and quantitative assessment comparable to standard-of-care acquisitions for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Eighteen patients were imaged with both standard protocol and fast protocol using reduced signal averages, each protocol including sagittal fat-suppressed T(2)-weighted, sagittal T(1)-weighted, and axial T(2)-weighted 2D fast spin-echo sequences. Fast-acquisition data was additionally reconstructed using vendor-supplied deep-learning reconstruction with three different noise reduction factors. For qualitative analysis, standard images as well as fast images with and without deep-learning reconstruction were graded by three radiologists on five different categories. For quantitative analysis, convolutional neural networks were applied to sagittal T(1)-weighted images to segment intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies, and disc heights and vertebral body volumes were derived. RESULTS: Based on noninferiority testing on qualitative scores, fast images without deep-learning reconstruction were inferior to standard images for most categories. However, deep-learning reconstruction improved the average scores, and noninferiority was observed over 24 out of 45 comparisons (all with sagittal T(2)-weighted images while 4/5 comparisons with sagittal T(1)-weighted and axial T(2)-weighted images). Interobserver variability increased with 50 and 75% noise reduction factors. Deep-learning reconstructed fast images with 50% and 75% noise reduction factors had comparable disc heights and vertebral body volumes to standard images (r(2) [Formula: see text] 0.86 for disc heights and r(2) [Formula: see text] 0.98 for vertebral body volumes). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that deep-learning-reconstructed fast-acquisition images have the potential to provide noninferior image quality and comparable quantitative assessment to standard clinical images.