Cargando…

Technology and Tool Development for BACPAC: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Accelerated Lumbar Spine MRI with Deep-Learning Based Image Reconstruction at 3T

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether combining fast acquisitions with deep-learning reconstruction can provide diagnostically useful images and quantitative assessment comparable to standard-of-care acquisitions for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Eighteen patients were imaged wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Misung, Bahroos, Emma, Hess, Madeline E, Chin, Cynthia T, Gao, Kenneth T, Shin, David D, Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E, Link, Thomas M, Pedoia, Valentina, Majumdar, Sharmila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36943371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnad035
_version_ 1785085034973102080
author Han, Misung
Bahroos, Emma
Hess, Madeline E
Chin, Cynthia T
Gao, Kenneth T
Shin, David D
Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E
Link, Thomas M
Pedoia, Valentina
Majumdar, Sharmila
author_facet Han, Misung
Bahroos, Emma
Hess, Madeline E
Chin, Cynthia T
Gao, Kenneth T
Shin, David D
Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E
Link, Thomas M
Pedoia, Valentina
Majumdar, Sharmila
author_sort Han, Misung
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether combining fast acquisitions with deep-learning reconstruction can provide diagnostically useful images and quantitative assessment comparable to standard-of-care acquisitions for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Eighteen patients were imaged with both standard protocol and fast protocol using reduced signal averages, each protocol including sagittal fat-suppressed T(2)-weighted, sagittal T(1)-weighted, and axial T(2)-weighted 2D fast spin-echo sequences. Fast-acquisition data was additionally reconstructed using vendor-supplied deep-learning reconstruction with three different noise reduction factors. For qualitative analysis, standard images as well as fast images with and without deep-learning reconstruction were graded by three radiologists on five different categories. For quantitative analysis, convolutional neural networks were applied to sagittal T(1)-weighted images to segment intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies, and disc heights and vertebral body volumes were derived. RESULTS: Based on noninferiority testing on qualitative scores, fast images without deep-learning reconstruction were inferior to standard images for most categories. However, deep-learning reconstruction improved the average scores, and noninferiority was observed over 24 out of 45 comparisons (all with sagittal T(2)-weighted images while 4/5 comparisons with sagittal T(1)-weighted and axial T(2)-weighted images). Interobserver variability increased with 50 and 75% noise reduction factors. Deep-learning reconstructed fast images with 50% and 75% noise reduction factors had comparable disc heights and vertebral body volumes to standard images (r(2) [Formula: see text] 0.86 for disc heights and r(2) [Formula: see text] 0.98 for vertebral body volumes). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that deep-learning-reconstructed fast-acquisition images have the potential to provide noninferior image quality and comparable quantitative assessment to standard clinical images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10403300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104033002023-08-05 Technology and Tool Development for BACPAC: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Accelerated Lumbar Spine MRI with Deep-Learning Based Image Reconstruction at 3T Han, Misung Bahroos, Emma Hess, Madeline E Chin, Cynthia T Gao, Kenneth T Shin, David D Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E Link, Thomas M Pedoia, Valentina Majumdar, Sharmila Pain Med Original Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether combining fast acquisitions with deep-learning reconstruction can provide diagnostically useful images and quantitative assessment comparable to standard-of-care acquisitions for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Eighteen patients were imaged with both standard protocol and fast protocol using reduced signal averages, each protocol including sagittal fat-suppressed T(2)-weighted, sagittal T(1)-weighted, and axial T(2)-weighted 2D fast spin-echo sequences. Fast-acquisition data was additionally reconstructed using vendor-supplied deep-learning reconstruction with three different noise reduction factors. For qualitative analysis, standard images as well as fast images with and without deep-learning reconstruction were graded by three radiologists on five different categories. For quantitative analysis, convolutional neural networks were applied to sagittal T(1)-weighted images to segment intervertebral discs and vertebral bodies, and disc heights and vertebral body volumes were derived. RESULTS: Based on noninferiority testing on qualitative scores, fast images without deep-learning reconstruction were inferior to standard images for most categories. However, deep-learning reconstruction improved the average scores, and noninferiority was observed over 24 out of 45 comparisons (all with sagittal T(2)-weighted images while 4/5 comparisons with sagittal T(1)-weighted and axial T(2)-weighted images). Interobserver variability increased with 50 and 75% noise reduction factors. Deep-learning reconstructed fast images with 50% and 75% noise reduction factors had comparable disc heights and vertebral body volumes to standard images (r(2) [Formula: see text] 0.86 for disc heights and r(2) [Formula: see text] 0.98 for vertebral body volumes). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that deep-learning-reconstructed fast-acquisition images have the potential to provide noninferior image quality and comparable quantitative assessment to standard clinical images. Oxford University Press 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10403300/ /pubmed/36943371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnad035 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Han, Misung
Bahroos, Emma
Hess, Madeline E
Chin, Cynthia T
Gao, Kenneth T
Shin, David D
Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E
Link, Thomas M
Pedoia, Valentina
Majumdar, Sharmila
Technology and Tool Development for BACPAC: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Accelerated Lumbar Spine MRI with Deep-Learning Based Image Reconstruction at 3T
title Technology and Tool Development for BACPAC: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Accelerated Lumbar Spine MRI with Deep-Learning Based Image Reconstruction at 3T
title_full Technology and Tool Development for BACPAC: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Accelerated Lumbar Spine MRI with Deep-Learning Based Image Reconstruction at 3T
title_fullStr Technology and Tool Development for BACPAC: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Accelerated Lumbar Spine MRI with Deep-Learning Based Image Reconstruction at 3T
title_full_unstemmed Technology and Tool Development for BACPAC: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Accelerated Lumbar Spine MRI with Deep-Learning Based Image Reconstruction at 3T
title_short Technology and Tool Development for BACPAC: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Accelerated Lumbar Spine MRI with Deep-Learning Based Image Reconstruction at 3T
title_sort technology and tool development for bacpac: qualitative and quantitative analysis of accelerated lumbar spine mri with deep-learning based image reconstruction at 3t
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36943371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnad035
work_keys_str_mv AT hanmisung technologyandtooldevelopmentforbacpacqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofacceleratedlumbarspinemriwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionat3t
AT bahroosemma technologyandtooldevelopmentforbacpacqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofacceleratedlumbarspinemriwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionat3t
AT hessmadelinee technologyandtooldevelopmentforbacpacqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofacceleratedlumbarspinemriwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionat3t
AT chincynthiat technologyandtooldevelopmentforbacpacqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofacceleratedlumbarspinemriwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionat3t
AT gaokennetht technologyandtooldevelopmentforbacpacqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofacceleratedlumbarspinemriwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionat3t
AT shindavidd technologyandtooldevelopmentforbacpacqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofacceleratedlumbarspinemriwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionat3t
AT villanuevameyerjaviere technologyandtooldevelopmentforbacpacqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofacceleratedlumbarspinemriwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionat3t
AT linkthomasm technologyandtooldevelopmentforbacpacqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofacceleratedlumbarspinemriwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionat3t
AT pedoiavalentina technologyandtooldevelopmentforbacpacqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofacceleratedlumbarspinemriwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionat3t
AT majumdarsharmila technologyandtooldevelopmentforbacpacqualitativeandquantitativeanalysisofacceleratedlumbarspinemriwithdeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionat3t