Cargando…

Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA): a review of examining the chemical exposome

ABSTRACT: Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA) are powerful techniques that rely on high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and computational tools to detect and identify unknown or suspected chemicals in the exposome. Fully understanding the chemical exposome requires c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manz, Katherine E., Feerick, Anna, Braun, Joseph M., Feng, Yong-Lai, Hall, Amber, Koelmel, Jeremy, Manzano, Carlos, Newton, Seth R., Pennell, Kurt D., Place, Benjamin J., Godri Pollitt, Krystal J., Prasse, Carsten, Young, Joshua A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37380877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00574-6
_version_ 1785085051006877696
author Manz, Katherine E.
Feerick, Anna
Braun, Joseph M.
Feng, Yong-Lai
Hall, Amber
Koelmel, Jeremy
Manzano, Carlos
Newton, Seth R.
Pennell, Kurt D.
Place, Benjamin J.
Godri Pollitt, Krystal J.
Prasse, Carsten
Young, Joshua A.
author_facet Manz, Katherine E.
Feerick, Anna
Braun, Joseph M.
Feng, Yong-Lai
Hall, Amber
Koelmel, Jeremy
Manzano, Carlos
Newton, Seth R.
Pennell, Kurt D.
Place, Benjamin J.
Godri Pollitt, Krystal J.
Prasse, Carsten
Young, Joshua A.
author_sort Manz, Katherine E.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA) are powerful techniques that rely on high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and computational tools to detect and identify unknown or suspected chemicals in the exposome. Fully understanding the chemical exposome requires characterization of both environmental media and human specimens. As such, we conducted a review to examine the use of different NTA and SSA methods in various exposure media and human samples, including the results and chemicals detected. The literature review was conducted by searching literature databases, such as PubMed and Web of Science, for keywords, such as “non-targeted analysis”, “suspect screening analysis” and the exposure media. Sources of human exposure to environmental chemicals discussed in this review include water, air, soil/sediment, dust, and food and consumer products. The use of NTA for exposure discovery in human biospecimen is also reviewed. The chemical space that has been captured using NTA varies by media analyzed and analytical platform. In each media the chemicals that were frequently detected using NTA were: per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and pharmaceuticals in water, pesticides and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil and sediment, volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in air, flame retardants in dust, plasticizers in consumer products, and plasticizers, pesticides, and halogenated compounds in human samples. Some studies reviewed herein used both liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC) HRMS to increase the detected chemical space (16%); however, the majority (51%) only used LC-HRMS and fewer used GC-HRMS (32%). Finally, we identify knowledge and technology gaps that must be overcome to fully assess potential chemical exposures using NTA. Understanding the chemical space is essential to identifying and prioritizing gaps in our understanding of exposure sources and prior exposures. IMPACT STATEMENT: This review examines the results and chemicals detected by analyzing exposure media and human samples using high-resolution mass spectrometry based non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA). [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10403360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104033602023-08-06 Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA): a review of examining the chemical exposome Manz, Katherine E. Feerick, Anna Braun, Joseph M. Feng, Yong-Lai Hall, Amber Koelmel, Jeremy Manzano, Carlos Newton, Seth R. Pennell, Kurt D. Place, Benjamin J. Godri Pollitt, Krystal J. Prasse, Carsten Young, Joshua A. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Review Article ABSTRACT: Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA) are powerful techniques that rely on high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and computational tools to detect and identify unknown or suspected chemicals in the exposome. Fully understanding the chemical exposome requires characterization of both environmental media and human specimens. As such, we conducted a review to examine the use of different NTA and SSA methods in various exposure media and human samples, including the results and chemicals detected. The literature review was conducted by searching literature databases, such as PubMed and Web of Science, for keywords, such as “non-targeted analysis”, “suspect screening analysis” and the exposure media. Sources of human exposure to environmental chemicals discussed in this review include water, air, soil/sediment, dust, and food and consumer products. The use of NTA for exposure discovery in human biospecimen is also reviewed. The chemical space that has been captured using NTA varies by media analyzed and analytical platform. In each media the chemicals that were frequently detected using NTA were: per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and pharmaceuticals in water, pesticides and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil and sediment, volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in air, flame retardants in dust, plasticizers in consumer products, and plasticizers, pesticides, and halogenated compounds in human samples. Some studies reviewed herein used both liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC) HRMS to increase the detected chemical space (16%); however, the majority (51%) only used LC-HRMS and fewer used GC-HRMS (32%). Finally, we identify knowledge and technology gaps that must be overcome to fully assess potential chemical exposures using NTA. Understanding the chemical space is essential to identifying and prioritizing gaps in our understanding of exposure sources and prior exposures. IMPACT STATEMENT: This review examines the results and chemicals detected by analyzing exposure media and human samples using high-resolution mass spectrometry based non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA). [Image: see text] Nature Publishing Group US 2023-06-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10403360/ /pubmed/37380877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00574-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Manz, Katherine E.
Feerick, Anna
Braun, Joseph M.
Feng, Yong-Lai
Hall, Amber
Koelmel, Jeremy
Manzano, Carlos
Newton, Seth R.
Pennell, Kurt D.
Place, Benjamin J.
Godri Pollitt, Krystal J.
Prasse, Carsten
Young, Joshua A.
Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA): a review of examining the chemical exposome
title Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA): a review of examining the chemical exposome
title_full Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA): a review of examining the chemical exposome
title_fullStr Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA): a review of examining the chemical exposome
title_full_unstemmed Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA): a review of examining the chemical exposome
title_short Non-targeted analysis (NTA) and suspect screening analysis (SSA): a review of examining the chemical exposome
title_sort non-targeted analysis (nta) and suspect screening analysis (ssa): a review of examining the chemical exposome
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37380877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-023-00574-6
work_keys_str_mv AT manzkatherinee nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT feerickanna nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT braunjosephm nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT fengyonglai nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT hallamber nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT koelmeljeremy nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT manzanocarlos nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT newtonsethr nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT pennellkurtd nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT placebenjaminj nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT godripollittkrystalj nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT prassecarsten nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome
AT youngjoshuaa nontargetedanalysisntaandsuspectscreeninganalysisssaareviewofexaminingthechemicalexposome