Cargando…
Spermatogenesis after gonadotoxic childhood treatment: follow-up of 12 patients
STUDY QUESTION: What is the long-term impact of presumed gonadotoxic treatment during childhood on the patient’s testicular function at adulthood? SUMMARY ANSWER: Although most patients showed low testicular volumes and some degree of reproductive hormone disruption 12.3 (2.3–21.0) years after gonad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoad029 |
Sumario: | STUDY QUESTION: What is the long-term impact of presumed gonadotoxic treatment during childhood on the patient’s testicular function at adulthood? SUMMARY ANSWER: Although most patients showed low testicular volumes and some degree of reproductive hormone disruption 12.3 (2.3–21.0) years after gonadotoxic childhood therapy, active spermatogenesis was demonstrated in the semen sample of 8 out of the 12 patients. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In recent decades, experimental testicular tissue banking programmes have been set up to safeguard the future fertility of young boys requiring chemo- and/or radiotherapy with significant gonadotoxicity. Although the risk of azoospermia following such therapies is estimated to be high, only limited long-term data are available on the reproductive potential at adulthood. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This single-centre prospective cohort study was conducted between September 2020 and February 2023 and involved 12 adult patients. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This study was carried out in a tertiary care centre and included 12 young adults (18.1–28.3 years old) who had been offered testicular tissue banking prior to gonadotoxic treatment during childhood. All patients had a consultation and physical examination with a fertility specialist, a scrotal ultrasound to measure the testicular volumes and evaluate the testicular parenchyma, a blood test for assessment of reproductive hormones, and a semen analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Testicular tissue was banked prior to the gonadotoxic treatment for 10 out of the 12 included patients. Testicular volumes were low for 9 patients, and 10 patients showed some degree of reproductive hormone disruption. Remarkably, ongoing spermatogenesis was demonstrated in 8 patients at a median 12.3 (range 2.3–21.0) years post-treatment. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study had a limited sample size, making additional research with a larger study population necessary to verify these preliminary findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: These findings highlight the need for multicentric research with a larger study population to establish universal inclusion criteria for immature testicular tissue banking. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was conducted with financial support from the Research Programme of the Research Foundation-Flanders (G010918N), Kom Op Tegen Kanker, and Scientific Fund Willy Gepts (WFWG19-03). The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04202094; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04202094?id=NCT04202094&draw=2&rank=1 This study was registered on 6 December 2019, and the first patient was enrolled on 8 September 2020. |
---|