Cargando…

Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition

Feedback networks in the brain regulate downstream auditory function as peripheral as the cochlea. However, the upstream neural consequences of this peripheral regulation are less understood. For instance, the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) in the brainstem causes putative attenuation of respons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boothalingam, Sriram, Peterson, Abigayle, Powell, Lindsey, Easwar, Vijayalakshmi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37542191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39850-8
_version_ 1785085095942553600
author Boothalingam, Sriram
Peterson, Abigayle
Powell, Lindsey
Easwar, Vijayalakshmi
author_facet Boothalingam, Sriram
Peterson, Abigayle
Powell, Lindsey
Easwar, Vijayalakshmi
author_sort Boothalingam, Sriram
collection PubMed
description Feedback networks in the brain regulate downstream auditory function as peripheral as the cochlea. However, the upstream neural consequences of this peripheral regulation are less understood. For instance, the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) in the brainstem causes putative attenuation of responses generated in the cochlea and cortex, but those generated in the brainstem are perplexingly unaffected. Based on known neural circuitry, we hypothesized that the inhibition of peripheral input is compensated for by positive feedback in the brainstem over time. We predicted that the inhibition could be captured at the brainstem with shorter (1.5 s) than previously employed long duration (240 s) stimuli where this inhibition is likely compensated for. Results from 16 normal-hearing human listeners support our hypothesis in that when the MOCR is activated, there is a robust reduction of responses generated at the periphery, brainstem, and cortex for short-duration stimuli. Such inhibition at the brainstem, however, diminishes for long-duration stimuli suggesting some compensatory mechanisms at play. Our findings provide a novel non-invasive window into potential gain compensation mechanisms in the brainstem that may have implications for auditory disorders such as tinnitus. Our methodology will be useful in the evaluation of efferent function in individuals with hearing loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10403563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104035632023-08-06 Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition Boothalingam, Sriram Peterson, Abigayle Powell, Lindsey Easwar, Vijayalakshmi Sci Rep Article Feedback networks in the brain regulate downstream auditory function as peripheral as the cochlea. However, the upstream neural consequences of this peripheral regulation are less understood. For instance, the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) in the brainstem causes putative attenuation of responses generated in the cochlea and cortex, but those generated in the brainstem are perplexingly unaffected. Based on known neural circuitry, we hypothesized that the inhibition of peripheral input is compensated for by positive feedback in the brainstem over time. We predicted that the inhibition could be captured at the brainstem with shorter (1.5 s) than previously employed long duration (240 s) stimuli where this inhibition is likely compensated for. Results from 16 normal-hearing human listeners support our hypothesis in that when the MOCR is activated, there is a robust reduction of responses generated at the periphery, brainstem, and cortex for short-duration stimuli. Such inhibition at the brainstem, however, diminishes for long-duration stimuli suggesting some compensatory mechanisms at play. Our findings provide a novel non-invasive window into potential gain compensation mechanisms in the brainstem that may have implications for auditory disorders such as tinnitus. Our methodology will be useful in the evaluation of efferent function in individuals with hearing loss. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10403563/ /pubmed/37542191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39850-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Boothalingam, Sriram
Peterson, Abigayle
Powell, Lindsey
Easwar, Vijayalakshmi
Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition
title Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition
title_full Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition
title_fullStr Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition
title_short Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition
title_sort auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37542191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39850-8
work_keys_str_mv AT boothalingamsriram auditorybrainstemmechanismslikelycompensateforselfimposedperipheralinhibition
AT petersonabigayle auditorybrainstemmechanismslikelycompensateforselfimposedperipheralinhibition
AT powelllindsey auditorybrainstemmechanismslikelycompensateforselfimposedperipheralinhibition
AT easwarvijayalakshmi auditorybrainstemmechanismslikelycompensateforselfimposedperipheralinhibition