Cargando…

Detection of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and assessing diagnostic performance of colposcopy among women with oncogenic HPV

BACKGROUND: HPV screening tests may improve cervical cancer risk stratification and better guide decisions about follow-up with colposcopy/biopsy. This study aimed to estimate the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) among women with oncogenic HPV types and evaluate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaoxiao, Xiang, Fenfen, Zhao, Yunzhi, Li, Qian, Gu, Qing, Zhang, Xinpei, Chen, Zixi, Zhang, Mengzhe, Wang, Jun, Liu, Rongrong, Kang, Xiangdong, Wu, Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37542333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02538-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: HPV screening tests may improve cervical cancer risk stratification and better guide decisions about follow-up with colposcopy/biopsy. This study aimed to estimate the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) among women with oncogenic HPV types and evaluate the performance of colposcopy in the diagnosis of histologic CIN2 + at Putuo Hospital, Shanghai, China. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted from February 2020 to December 2022 among women who were referred to colposcopy. Women with high-risk (HR) HPV-positive, cytology testing and colposcopy-directed biopsy were included. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that high-grade colposcopic impression ((OR, 17.61%, 95%CI: 11.54–26.85%) was associated with the highest risk for detecting CIN2+, followed by HSIL + cytology (OR, 6.90%, 95%CI: 3.56–13.37%) and HPV16/18 positive (OR, 2.91%, 95%CI: 2.12–3.99%). Overall, CIN2 + was detected in 14.6% of 2007 women. HPV16/18 had higher CIN2 + risks than other HR-HPV genotypes (30.1% vs. 10.2%, P<0.001). Among women with low-grade cytology, 24.1% had CIN2+, and the risks for HPV16/18 (58.2%) were higher than for other HR-HPV(16.8%). For those with high-grade cytology, there was no significant difference between HPV groups ( 75.0% vs. 72.9%, P > 0.05). The diagnostic performance of colposcopy in diagnosis of CIN2 + by senior and junior colposcopists was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that referral to colposcopy is recommended in managing women with HR-HPV positive, and colposcopic impressions provide key clues for identification CIN2+.