Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: Biosimilar drugs have broadened the treatment options in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Real-world data comparing clinical outcomes of originator follitropin alfa (Gonal-f(®)) with its biosimilars are required to enrich the body of evidence for clinical decision-making on choice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Nayana Hitesh, Patel, Niket H., Patel, Molina Niket, Bhadarka, Harsha K., Vyas, Kairavi Sunilkumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547084
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_37_23
_version_ 1785085204605435904
author Patel, Nayana Hitesh
Patel, Niket H.
Patel, Molina Niket
Bhadarka, Harsha K.
Vyas, Kairavi Sunilkumar
author_facet Patel, Nayana Hitesh
Patel, Niket H.
Patel, Molina Niket
Bhadarka, Harsha K.
Vyas, Kairavi Sunilkumar
author_sort Patel, Nayana Hitesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biosimilar drugs have broadened the treatment options in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Real-world data comparing clinical outcomes of originator follitropin alfa (Gonal-f(®)) with its biosimilars are required to enrich the body of evidence for clinical decision-making on choice of drug. AIMS: To compare the ART outcomes in patients receiving originator follitropin (Gonal-f(®)) and its biosimilars in clinical setting. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Medical records of 364 infertile women who underwent ART between 2016 and 2020 at Akanksha Hospital and Research Institute, Gujrat, India, were retrospectively analysed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were divided into two cohorts based on treatment (Gonal-f(®) cohort; N = 174 and biosimilar cohort; N = 190), each cohort further subdivided into group A (age <35 years) and group B (age ≥35 years). Fresh or frozen embryo transfer was performed as per the standard procedures of the clinic. Pregnancy rates and live birth rate (LBR) were the primary main outcome measures in this study. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive statistics and Chi-square test were used for analysis. RESULTS: The number of oocytes retrieved from Gonal-f(®) and biosimilar cohorts were comparable (13.3 vs. 14.4). Compared to biosimilars, Gonal-f(®) treatment resulted in higher yield of cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryos, and the proportion of women with good quality embryos was higher in the Gonal-f(®) cohort than the biosimilar cohort (83.3% vs. 69.5%). Patients receiving Gonal-f(®) reported higher pregnancy rates (59.2% vs. 39.7%) and LBR (43% vs. 17.7%) compared to those receiving biosimilars. CONCLUSIONS: Gonal-f(®) (originator follitropin) treatment could result in higher pregnancy rates and LBR in comparison to biosimilars in real-world setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10404022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104040222023-08-06 Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study Patel, Nayana Hitesh Patel, Niket H. Patel, Molina Niket Bhadarka, Harsha K. Vyas, Kairavi Sunilkumar J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Biosimilar drugs have broadened the treatment options in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Real-world data comparing clinical outcomes of originator follitropin alfa (Gonal-f(®)) with its biosimilars are required to enrich the body of evidence for clinical decision-making on choice of drug. AIMS: To compare the ART outcomes in patients receiving originator follitropin (Gonal-f(®)) and its biosimilars in clinical setting. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Medical records of 364 infertile women who underwent ART between 2016 and 2020 at Akanksha Hospital and Research Institute, Gujrat, India, were retrospectively analysed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were divided into two cohorts based on treatment (Gonal-f(®) cohort; N = 174 and biosimilar cohort; N = 190), each cohort further subdivided into group A (age <35 years) and group B (age ≥35 years). Fresh or frozen embryo transfer was performed as per the standard procedures of the clinic. Pregnancy rates and live birth rate (LBR) were the primary main outcome measures in this study. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive statistics and Chi-square test were used for analysis. RESULTS: The number of oocytes retrieved from Gonal-f(®) and biosimilar cohorts were comparable (13.3 vs. 14.4). Compared to biosimilars, Gonal-f(®) treatment resulted in higher yield of cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryos, and the proportion of women with good quality embryos was higher in the Gonal-f(®) cohort than the biosimilar cohort (83.3% vs. 69.5%). Patients receiving Gonal-f(®) reported higher pregnancy rates (59.2% vs. 39.7%) and LBR (43% vs. 17.7%) compared to those receiving biosimilars. CONCLUSIONS: Gonal-f(®) (originator follitropin) treatment could result in higher pregnancy rates and LBR in comparison to biosimilars in real-world setting. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10404022/ /pubmed/37547084 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_37_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patel, Nayana Hitesh
Patel, Niket H.
Patel, Molina Niket
Bhadarka, Harsha K.
Vyas, Kairavi Sunilkumar
Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study
title Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study
title_full Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study
title_short Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Originator Follitropin Alfa and Follitropin Alfa Biosimilars in Real-world Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Study
title_sort clinical outcomes in patients receiving originator follitropin alfa and follitropin alfa biosimilars in real-world clinical practice: a retrospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547084
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_37_23
work_keys_str_mv AT patelnayanahitesh clinicaloutcomesinpatientsreceivingoriginatorfollitropinalfaandfollitropinalfabiosimilarsinrealworldclinicalpracticearetrospectivestudy
AT patelniketh clinicaloutcomesinpatientsreceivingoriginatorfollitropinalfaandfollitropinalfabiosimilarsinrealworldclinicalpracticearetrospectivestudy
AT patelmolinaniket clinicaloutcomesinpatientsreceivingoriginatorfollitropinalfaandfollitropinalfabiosimilarsinrealworldclinicalpracticearetrospectivestudy
AT bhadarkaharshak clinicaloutcomesinpatientsreceivingoriginatorfollitropinalfaandfollitropinalfabiosimilarsinrealworldclinicalpracticearetrospectivestudy
AT vyaskairavisunilkumar clinicaloutcomesinpatientsreceivingoriginatorfollitropinalfaandfollitropinalfabiosimilarsinrealworldclinicalpracticearetrospectivestudy