Cargando…

Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis

Background: Fecal immunoglobulin test (FIT) has been advocated as the first line of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in several jurisdictions. Most studies have focused on CRC as the outcome of interest. Our goal was to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of different thresholds of FIT as compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaghoobi, Mohammad, Mehraban Far, Parsa, Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, Yuan, Yuhong, Armstrong, David, Thabane, Lehana, Moayyedi, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Association of Gastroerterology and Hepatology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547494
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/mejdd.2022.299
_version_ 1785085222597951488
author Yaghoobi, Mohammad
Mehraban Far, Parsa
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Yuan, Yuhong
Armstrong, David
Thabane, Lehana
Moayyedi, Paul
author_facet Yaghoobi, Mohammad
Mehraban Far, Parsa
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Yuan, Yuhong
Armstrong, David
Thabane, Lehana
Moayyedi, Paul
author_sort Yaghoobi, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description Background: Fecal immunoglobulin test (FIT) has been advocated as the first line of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in several jurisdictions. Most studies have focused on CRC as the outcome of interest. Our goal was to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of different thresholds of FIT as compared with colonoscopy for detection of advanced colonic neoplasia and potential modifiers using proper Cochrane methodology. Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was performed for studies on FIT using colonoscopy as the reference standard to detect advanced neoplasia. Cochrane methodology was used to perform a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis. Diagnostic accuracy of different cut-offs of FIT, including 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 ng/mL, were calculated separately. Meta-regression analysis was also performed to detect potential a priori modifiers, including age, location of the tumor, and time from FIT to colonoscopy. Results: Twenty-four studies were included with no evidence of publication bias. The sensitivity of FIT did not decrease with lowering the cut-off, although specificity increased in higher cut-offs. Commonly used cut-offs of 50 ng/mL, 75 ng/mL, and 100 ng/mL for FIT provided sensitivity of 39%, 36%, 27% and specificity of 92%, 94%, 96%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of FIT did not significantly differ in proximal versus distal lesions or in individuals below or over the age of 50 years. The results remained robust in a meta-regression of the location of the study, time from FIT to colonoscopy, and methodological quality. Conclusion: The sensitivity of FIT might have been overestimated in previous studies focusing on CRC, and it seems to be independent of age, location of neoplasia, or cut-offs, contrary to some previous studies. Lowering the cut-off will reduce the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) by increasing specificity but without any effect on sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10404105
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Iranian Association of Gastroerterology and Hepatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104041052023-08-06 Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis Yaghoobi, Mohammad Mehraban Far, Parsa Mbuagbaw, Lawrence Yuan, Yuhong Armstrong, David Thabane, Lehana Moayyedi, Paul Middle East J Dig Dis Original Article Background: Fecal immunoglobulin test (FIT) has been advocated as the first line of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in several jurisdictions. Most studies have focused on CRC as the outcome of interest. Our goal was to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of different thresholds of FIT as compared with colonoscopy for detection of advanced colonic neoplasia and potential modifiers using proper Cochrane methodology. Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was performed for studies on FIT using colonoscopy as the reference standard to detect advanced neoplasia. Cochrane methodology was used to perform a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis. Diagnostic accuracy of different cut-offs of FIT, including 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 ng/mL, were calculated separately. Meta-regression analysis was also performed to detect potential a priori modifiers, including age, location of the tumor, and time from FIT to colonoscopy. Results: Twenty-four studies were included with no evidence of publication bias. The sensitivity of FIT did not decrease with lowering the cut-off, although specificity increased in higher cut-offs. Commonly used cut-offs of 50 ng/mL, 75 ng/mL, and 100 ng/mL for FIT provided sensitivity of 39%, 36%, 27% and specificity of 92%, 94%, 96%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of FIT did not significantly differ in proximal versus distal lesions or in individuals below or over the age of 50 years. The results remained robust in a meta-regression of the location of the study, time from FIT to colonoscopy, and methodological quality. Conclusion: The sensitivity of FIT might have been overestimated in previous studies focusing on CRC, and it seems to be independent of age, location of neoplasia, or cut-offs, contrary to some previous studies. Lowering the cut-off will reduce the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) by increasing specificity but without any effect on sensitivity. Iranian Association of Gastroerterology and Hepatology 2022-10 2022-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10404105/ /pubmed/37547494 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/mejdd.2022.299 Text en © 2022 Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is published by Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yaghoobi, Mohammad
Mehraban Far, Parsa
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Yuan, Yuhong
Armstrong, David
Thabane, Lehana
Moayyedi, Paul
Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis
title Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis
title_full Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis
title_short Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis
title_sort potential modifiers and different cut-offs in diagnostic accuracy of fecal immunochemical test in detecting advanced colon neoplasia: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404105/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37547494
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/mejdd.2022.299
work_keys_str_mv AT yaghoobimohammad potentialmodifiersanddifferentcutoffsindiagnosticaccuracyoffecalimmunochemicaltestindetectingadvancedcolonneoplasiaadiagnostictestaccuracymetaanalysis
AT mehrabanfarparsa potentialmodifiersanddifferentcutoffsindiagnosticaccuracyoffecalimmunochemicaltestindetectingadvancedcolonneoplasiaadiagnostictestaccuracymetaanalysis
AT mbuagbawlawrence potentialmodifiersanddifferentcutoffsindiagnosticaccuracyoffecalimmunochemicaltestindetectingadvancedcolonneoplasiaadiagnostictestaccuracymetaanalysis
AT yuanyuhong potentialmodifiersanddifferentcutoffsindiagnosticaccuracyoffecalimmunochemicaltestindetectingadvancedcolonneoplasiaadiagnostictestaccuracymetaanalysis
AT armstrongdavid potentialmodifiersanddifferentcutoffsindiagnosticaccuracyoffecalimmunochemicaltestindetectingadvancedcolonneoplasiaadiagnostictestaccuracymetaanalysis
AT thabanelehana potentialmodifiersanddifferentcutoffsindiagnosticaccuracyoffecalimmunochemicaltestindetectingadvancedcolonneoplasiaadiagnostictestaccuracymetaanalysis
AT moayyedipaul potentialmodifiersanddifferentcutoffsindiagnosticaccuracyoffecalimmunochemicaltestindetectingadvancedcolonneoplasiaadiagnostictestaccuracymetaanalysis