Cargando…

Performance of neuroretinal rim thickness measurement by Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes

Neuroretinal rim (NRR) measurement can aid the diagnosis of glaucoma. A few studies reported that Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT) had NRR segmentation errors. The current study investigated segmentation success of NRR in myopic eyes using the Cirrus built-in software and to determine the n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lam, Andrew K. C., Lai, H. C., Sung, Y. K., Lam, W. H., Tiu, C. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39701-6
_version_ 1785085250589687808
author Lam, Andrew K. C.
Lai, H. C.
Sung, Y. K.
Lam, W. H.
Tiu, C. M.
author_facet Lam, Andrew K. C.
Lai, H. C.
Sung, Y. K.
Lam, W. H.
Tiu, C. M.
author_sort Lam, Andrew K. C.
collection PubMed
description Neuroretinal rim (NRR) measurement can aid the diagnosis of glaucoma. A few studies reported that Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT) had NRR segmentation errors. The current study investigated segmentation success of NRR in myopic eyes using the Cirrus built-in software and to determine the number of acquisitions required to identify NRR thinning. Right eye of 87 healthy adult myopes had an optic disc scanned using Cirrus HD-OCT for five successive acquisitions. A masked examiner evaluated 36 radial line images of each scan to screen for segmentation errors using the built-in software at the Bruch’s membrane opening (BMO) and/or internal limiting membrane (ILM). Participants with three accurate NRR acquisitions had their average NRR thickness determined. This result was compared with average of the two acquisitions and the first acquisition. Among 435 OCT scans of the optic disc (87 eyes × 5 acquisitions), 129 (29.7%) scans had segmentation errors that occurred mainly at the ILM. The inferior-temporal and superior meridians had slightly more segmentation errors than other meridians, independent of axial length, amount of myopia, or presence of peripapillary atrophy. Sixty-five eyes (74.7%) had at least three accurate NRR measurements. The three acquisitions had high reliability in NRR thickness in the four quadrants (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.990, coefficient of variation < 3.9%). NRR difference between the first acquisition and the average of three acquisitions was small (mean difference 2 ± 13 μm, 95% limits of agreement within ± 30 μm) among the four quadrants. Segmentation errors in NRR measurements appeared regardless of axial length, amount of myopia, or presence of peripapillary atrophy. Cirrus segmentation lines should be manually inspected when measuring NRR thickness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10404224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104042242023-08-07 Performance of neuroretinal rim thickness measurement by Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes Lam, Andrew K. C. Lai, H. C. Sung, Y. K. Lam, W. H. Tiu, C. M. Sci Rep Article Neuroretinal rim (NRR) measurement can aid the diagnosis of glaucoma. A few studies reported that Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT) had NRR segmentation errors. The current study investigated segmentation success of NRR in myopic eyes using the Cirrus built-in software and to determine the number of acquisitions required to identify NRR thinning. Right eye of 87 healthy adult myopes had an optic disc scanned using Cirrus HD-OCT for five successive acquisitions. A masked examiner evaluated 36 radial line images of each scan to screen for segmentation errors using the built-in software at the Bruch’s membrane opening (BMO) and/or internal limiting membrane (ILM). Participants with three accurate NRR acquisitions had their average NRR thickness determined. This result was compared with average of the two acquisitions and the first acquisition. Among 435 OCT scans of the optic disc (87 eyes × 5 acquisitions), 129 (29.7%) scans had segmentation errors that occurred mainly at the ILM. The inferior-temporal and superior meridians had slightly more segmentation errors than other meridians, independent of axial length, amount of myopia, or presence of peripapillary atrophy. Sixty-five eyes (74.7%) had at least three accurate NRR measurements. The three acquisitions had high reliability in NRR thickness in the four quadrants (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.990, coefficient of variation < 3.9%). NRR difference between the first acquisition and the average of three acquisitions was small (mean difference 2 ± 13 μm, 95% limits of agreement within ± 30 μm) among the four quadrants. Segmentation errors in NRR measurements appeared regardless of axial length, amount of myopia, or presence of peripapillary atrophy. Cirrus segmentation lines should be manually inspected when measuring NRR thickness. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10404224/ /pubmed/37543611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39701-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Lam, Andrew K. C.
Lai, H. C.
Sung, Y. K.
Lam, W. H.
Tiu, C. M.
Performance of neuroretinal rim thickness measurement by Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes
title Performance of neuroretinal rim thickness measurement by Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes
title_full Performance of neuroretinal rim thickness measurement by Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes
title_fullStr Performance of neuroretinal rim thickness measurement by Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes
title_full_unstemmed Performance of neuroretinal rim thickness measurement by Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes
title_short Performance of neuroretinal rim thickness measurement by Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes
title_sort performance of neuroretinal rim thickness measurement by cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography in myopic eyes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39701-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lamandrewkc performanceofneuroretinalrimthicknessmeasurementbycirrushighdefinitionopticalcoherencetomographyinmyopiceyes
AT laihc performanceofneuroretinalrimthicknessmeasurementbycirrushighdefinitionopticalcoherencetomographyinmyopiceyes
AT sungyk performanceofneuroretinalrimthicknessmeasurementbycirrushighdefinitionopticalcoherencetomographyinmyopiceyes
AT lamwh performanceofneuroretinalrimthicknessmeasurementbycirrushighdefinitionopticalcoherencetomographyinmyopiceyes
AT tiucm performanceofneuroretinalrimthicknessmeasurementbycirrushighdefinitionopticalcoherencetomographyinmyopiceyes