Cargando…
Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors
We investigate the optimal orientation for a fixed flat plate solar collector using the clear sky model. The ground reflection component of irradiation that hits the collector’s surface is ignored due to its relatively small magnitude when compared to the direct beam and sky diffusive components. An...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39892-y |
_version_ | 1785085264645849088 |
---|---|
author | Aghamohammadi, Amir Foulaadvand, M. Ebrahim |
author_facet | Aghamohammadi, Amir Foulaadvand, M. Ebrahim |
author_sort | Aghamohammadi, Amir |
collection | PubMed |
description | We investigate the optimal orientation for a fixed flat plate solar collector using the clear sky model. The ground reflection component of irradiation that hits the collector’s surface is ignored due to its relatively small magnitude when compared to the direct beam and sky diffusive components. Analytical calculations demonstrate that regardless of the collector’s latitude, the most effective azimuthal angle, [Formula: see text] , is 0, which generally corresponds to a North–South direction. However, the optimal tilt angle, [Formula: see text] , is dependent on both the Day of Year (DoY) and the collector’s local latitude. For latitudes typical of mid-altitude climate zones, we can calculate the optimal tilt angle and the maximum energy that the collector can harvest during each DoY. We compare the maximum daily received energy—which is the sum of the direct beam and sky diffusive energies—associated with this optimal orientation to their corresponding values when the flat plate tracks the Sun. The relative increase in total energy due to Sun tracking depends critically on the DoY, with a minimum value of about [Formula: see text] in early winter and a maximum value of [Formula: see text] over a large interval. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10404281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104042812023-08-07 Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors Aghamohammadi, Amir Foulaadvand, M. Ebrahim Sci Rep Article We investigate the optimal orientation for a fixed flat plate solar collector using the clear sky model. The ground reflection component of irradiation that hits the collector’s surface is ignored due to its relatively small magnitude when compared to the direct beam and sky diffusive components. Analytical calculations demonstrate that regardless of the collector’s latitude, the most effective azimuthal angle, [Formula: see text] , is 0, which generally corresponds to a North–South direction. However, the optimal tilt angle, [Formula: see text] , is dependent on both the Day of Year (DoY) and the collector’s local latitude. For latitudes typical of mid-altitude climate zones, we can calculate the optimal tilt angle and the maximum energy that the collector can harvest during each DoY. We compare the maximum daily received energy—which is the sum of the direct beam and sky diffusive energies—associated with this optimal orientation to their corresponding values when the flat plate tracks the Sun. The relative increase in total energy due to Sun tracking depends critically on the DoY, with a minimum value of about [Formula: see text] in early winter and a maximum value of [Formula: see text] over a large interval. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10404281/ /pubmed/37543687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39892-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Aghamohammadi, Amir Foulaadvand, M. Ebrahim Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors |
title | Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors |
title_full | Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors |
title_fullStr | Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors |
title_short | Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors |
title_sort | efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39892-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aghamohammadiamir efficiencycomparisonbetweentrackingandoptimallyfixedflatsolarcollectors AT foulaadvandmebrahim efficiencycomparisonbetweentrackingandoptimallyfixedflatsolarcollectors |