Cargando…

Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors

We investigate the optimal orientation for a fixed flat plate solar collector using the clear sky model. The ground reflection component of irradiation that hits the collector’s surface is ignored due to its relatively small magnitude when compared to the direct beam and sky diffusive components. An...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aghamohammadi, Amir, Foulaadvand, M. Ebrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39892-y
_version_ 1785085264645849088
author Aghamohammadi, Amir
Foulaadvand, M. Ebrahim
author_facet Aghamohammadi, Amir
Foulaadvand, M. Ebrahim
author_sort Aghamohammadi, Amir
collection PubMed
description We investigate the optimal orientation for a fixed flat plate solar collector using the clear sky model. The ground reflection component of irradiation that hits the collector’s surface is ignored due to its relatively small magnitude when compared to the direct beam and sky diffusive components. Analytical calculations demonstrate that regardless of the collector’s latitude, the most effective azimuthal angle, [Formula: see text] , is 0, which generally corresponds to a North–South direction. However, the optimal tilt angle, [Formula: see text] , is dependent on both the Day of  Year (DoY) and the collector’s local latitude. For latitudes typical of mid-altitude climate zones, we can calculate the optimal tilt angle and the maximum energy that the collector can harvest during each DoY. We compare the maximum daily received energy—which is the sum of the direct beam and sky diffusive energies—associated with this optimal orientation to their corresponding values when the flat plate tracks the Sun. The relative increase in total energy due to Sun tracking depends critically on the DoY, with a minimum value of about [Formula: see text] in early winter and a maximum value of [Formula: see text] over a large interval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10404281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104042812023-08-07 Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors Aghamohammadi, Amir Foulaadvand, M. Ebrahim Sci Rep Article We investigate the optimal orientation for a fixed flat plate solar collector using the clear sky model. The ground reflection component of irradiation that hits the collector’s surface is ignored due to its relatively small magnitude when compared to the direct beam and sky diffusive components. Analytical calculations demonstrate that regardless of the collector’s latitude, the most effective azimuthal angle, [Formula: see text] , is 0, which generally corresponds to a North–South direction. However, the optimal tilt angle, [Formula: see text] , is dependent on both the Day of  Year (DoY) and the collector’s local latitude. For latitudes typical of mid-altitude climate zones, we can calculate the optimal tilt angle and the maximum energy that the collector can harvest during each DoY. We compare the maximum daily received energy—which is the sum of the direct beam and sky diffusive energies—associated with this optimal orientation to their corresponding values when the flat plate tracks the Sun. The relative increase in total energy due to Sun tracking depends critically on the DoY, with a minimum value of about [Formula: see text] in early winter and a maximum value of [Formula: see text] over a large interval. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10404281/ /pubmed/37543687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39892-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Aghamohammadi, Amir
Foulaadvand, M. Ebrahim
Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors
title Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors
title_full Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors
title_fullStr Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors
title_short Efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors
title_sort efficiency comparison between tracking and optimally fixed flat solar collectors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39892-y
work_keys_str_mv AT aghamohammadiamir efficiencycomparisonbetweentrackingandoptimallyfixedflatsolarcollectors
AT foulaadvandmebrahim efficiencycomparisonbetweentrackingandoptimallyfixedflatsolarcollectors