Cargando…

Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation

BACKGROUND: Genome editing has been considered as powerful tool in agricultural fields. However, genome editing progress in cattle has not been fast as in other mammal species, for some disadvantages including long gestational periods, single pregnancy, and high raising cost. Furthermore, technicall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gim, Gyeong-Min, Eom, Kyeong-Hyeon, Kwon, Dong-Hyeok, Jung, Dae-Jin, Kim, Dae-Hyun, Yi, Jun-Koo, Ha, Jae-Jung, Lee, Ji-Hyun, Lee, Seong-Beom, Son, Woo-Jae, Yum, Soo-Young, Lee, Won-Wu, Jang, Goo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8
_version_ 1785085283094495232
author Gim, Gyeong-Min
Eom, Kyeong-Hyeon
Kwon, Dong-Hyeok
Jung, Dae-Jin
Kim, Dae-Hyun
Yi, Jun-Koo
Ha, Jae-Jung
Lee, Ji-Hyun
Lee, Seong-Beom
Son, Woo-Jae
Yum, Soo-Young
Lee, Won-Wu
Jang, Goo
author_facet Gim, Gyeong-Min
Eom, Kyeong-Hyeon
Kwon, Dong-Hyeok
Jung, Dae-Jin
Kim, Dae-Hyun
Yi, Jun-Koo
Ha, Jae-Jung
Lee, Ji-Hyun
Lee, Seong-Beom
Son, Woo-Jae
Yum, Soo-Young
Lee, Won-Wu
Jang, Goo
author_sort Gim, Gyeong-Min
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genome editing has been considered as powerful tool in agricultural fields. However, genome editing progress in cattle has not been fast as in other mammal species, for some disadvantages including long gestational periods, single pregnancy, and high raising cost. Furthermore, technically demanding methods such as microinjection and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) are needed for gene editing in cattle. In this point of view, electroporation in embryos has been risen as an alternative. RESULTS: First, editing efficiency of our electroporation methods were tested for embryos. Presence of mutation on embryo was confirmed by T7E1 assay. With first combination, mutation rates for MSTN and PRNP were 57.6% ± 13.7% and 54.6% ± 13.5%, respectively. In case of MSTN/BLG, mutation rates were 83.9% ± 23.6% for MSTN, 84.5% ± 18.0% for BLG. Afterwards, the double-KO embryos were transferred to surrogates and mutation rate was identified in resultant calves by targeted deep sequencing. Thirteen recipients were transferred for MSTN/PRNP, 4 calves were delivered, and one calf underwent an induction for double KO. Ten surrogates were given double-KO embryos for MSTN/BLG, and four of the six calves that were born had mutations in both genes. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrated that production of genome edited cattle via electroporation of RNP could be effectively applied. Finally, MSTN and PRNP from beef cattle and MSTN and BLG from dairy cattle have been born and they will be valuable resources for future precision breeding. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10404370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104043702023-08-07 Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation Gim, Gyeong-Min Eom, Kyeong-Hyeon Kwon, Dong-Hyeok Jung, Dae-Jin Kim, Dae-Hyun Yi, Jun-Koo Ha, Jae-Jung Lee, Ji-Hyun Lee, Seong-Beom Son, Woo-Jae Yum, Soo-Young Lee, Won-Wu Jang, Goo J Anim Sci Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: Genome editing has been considered as powerful tool in agricultural fields. However, genome editing progress in cattle has not been fast as in other mammal species, for some disadvantages including long gestational periods, single pregnancy, and high raising cost. Furthermore, technically demanding methods such as microinjection and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) are needed for gene editing in cattle. In this point of view, electroporation in embryos has been risen as an alternative. RESULTS: First, editing efficiency of our electroporation methods were tested for embryos. Presence of mutation on embryo was confirmed by T7E1 assay. With first combination, mutation rates for MSTN and PRNP were 57.6% ± 13.7% and 54.6% ± 13.5%, respectively. In case of MSTN/BLG, mutation rates were 83.9% ± 23.6% for MSTN, 84.5% ± 18.0% for BLG. Afterwards, the double-KO embryos were transferred to surrogates and mutation rate was identified in resultant calves by targeted deep sequencing. Thirteen recipients were transferred for MSTN/PRNP, 4 calves were delivered, and one calf underwent an induction for double KO. Ten surrogates were given double-KO embryos for MSTN/BLG, and four of the six calves that were born had mutations in both genes. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrated that production of genome edited cattle via electroporation of RNP could be effectively applied. Finally, MSTN and PRNP from beef cattle and MSTN and BLG from dairy cattle have been born and they will be valuable resources for future precision breeding. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8. BioMed Central 2023-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10404370/ /pubmed/37543609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gim, Gyeong-Min
Eom, Kyeong-Hyeon
Kwon, Dong-Hyeok
Jung, Dae-Jin
Kim, Dae-Hyun
Yi, Jun-Koo
Ha, Jae-Jung
Lee, Ji-Hyun
Lee, Seong-Beom
Son, Woo-Jae
Yum, Soo-Young
Lee, Won-Wu
Jang, Goo
Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation
title Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation
title_full Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation
title_fullStr Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation
title_full_unstemmed Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation
title_short Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation
title_sort generation of double knockout cattle via crispr-cas9 ribonucleoprotein (rnp) electroporation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37543609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gimgyeongmin generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT eomkyeonghyeon generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT kwondonghyeok generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT jungdaejin generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT kimdaehyun generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT yijunkoo generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT hajaejung generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT leejihyun generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT leeseongbeom generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT sonwoojae generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT yumsooyoung generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT leewonwu generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation
AT janggoo generationofdoubleknockoutcattleviacrisprcas9ribonucleoproteinrnpelectroporation