Cargando…

Long-term follow-up in patients with coeliac disease in the pandemic-era: a view from Sheffield the NHS England national centre for adult coeliac disease

AIM: To explore patients’ follow-up preferences. BACKGROUND: Optimal follow-up strategies for patients with coeliac disease remain a subject of debate. Research suggests patients’ prefer review by dietitians with a doctor available as required. METHODS: Patients with coeliac disease under review at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trott, Nick, Raju, Suneil A, Rej, Anupam, Hoffman, Olivia, Holland, William, Bebb, James R, Seamark, Leah, Williams, Marianne, Batlle, Cristian Costas, Jeanes, Yvonne M, Elli, Luca, Sanders, David S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554757
http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ghfbb.v16i2.2637
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To explore patients’ follow-up preferences. BACKGROUND: Optimal follow-up strategies for patients with coeliac disease remain a subject of debate. Research suggests patients’ prefer review by dietitians with a doctor available as required. METHODS: Patients with coeliac disease under review at our centre, completed a questionnaire assessing their views on what makes follow-up useful based on specific criteria. Bloods tests, symptoms review, dietary assessment, opportunity to ask questions and reassurance. Patients’ preferences between follow-up with a hospital doctor, a hospital dietitian, a hospital dietitian with a doctor available, a general practitioner, no follow-up or access when needed were also evaluated. RESULTS: 138 adult patients completed the questionnaire, 80% of patients reported following a strict gluten free diet (mean diagnosis was 7.2 years). Overall, 60% found their follow-up to be ‘very useful’ valuing their review of blood tests and symptoms (71%) reassurance (60%) and opportunity to ask questions (58%). Follow-up by a dietitian with a doctor available was the most preferred option of review (p<0.001) except when compared to hospital doctor (p=0.75). Novel modalities of follow-up such as telephone and video reviews were regarded as of equal value to face-to-face appointments (65% and 62% respectively). Digital applications were significantly less preferable (38%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Follow-up by a dietitian with a doctor available as needed was the most preferred follow-up method. However, in this study follow-up by a dietitian with doctor available and hospital doctor alone was statistically equivalent. Many patients consider telephone and video follow-up of equal value to face-to-face reviews.