Cargando…

Different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making

Efficient decision-making requires accounting for sources of uncertainty (noise, or variability). Many studies have shown how the nervous system is able to account for perceptual uncertainty (noise, variability) that arises from limitations in its own abilities to encode perceptual stimuli. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aston, Stacey, Nardini, Marko, Beierholm, Ulrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37545308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0349
_version_ 1785085407450365952
author Aston, Stacey
Nardini, Marko
Beierholm, Ulrik
author_facet Aston, Stacey
Nardini, Marko
Beierholm, Ulrik
author_sort Aston, Stacey
collection PubMed
description Efficient decision-making requires accounting for sources of uncertainty (noise, or variability). Many studies have shown how the nervous system is able to account for perceptual uncertainty (noise, variability) that arises from limitations in its own abilities to encode perceptual stimuli. However, many other sources of uncertainty exist, reflecting for example variability in the behaviour of other agents or physical processes. Here we review previous studies on decision making under uncertainty as a function of the different types of uncertainty that the nervous system encounters, showing that noise that is intrinsic to the perceptual system can often be accounted for near-optimally (i.e. not statistically different from optimally), whereas accounting for other types of uncertainty can be much more challenging. As an example, we present a study in which participants made decisions about multisensory stimuli with both intrinsic (perceptual) and extrinsic (environmental) uncertainty and show that the nervous system accounts for these differently when making decisions: they account for internal uncertainty but under-account for external. Human perceptual systems may be well equipped to account for intrinsic (perceptual) uncertainty because, in principle, they have access to this. Accounting for external uncertainty is more challenging because this uncertainty must be learned. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Decision and control processes in multisensory perception’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10404920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104049202023-08-08 Different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making Aston, Stacey Nardini, Marko Beierholm, Ulrik Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Efficient decision-making requires accounting for sources of uncertainty (noise, or variability). Many studies have shown how the nervous system is able to account for perceptual uncertainty (noise, variability) that arises from limitations in its own abilities to encode perceptual stimuli. However, many other sources of uncertainty exist, reflecting for example variability in the behaviour of other agents or physical processes. Here we review previous studies on decision making under uncertainty as a function of the different types of uncertainty that the nervous system encounters, showing that noise that is intrinsic to the perceptual system can often be accounted for near-optimally (i.e. not statistically different from optimally), whereas accounting for other types of uncertainty can be much more challenging. As an example, we present a study in which participants made decisions about multisensory stimuli with both intrinsic (perceptual) and extrinsic (environmental) uncertainty and show that the nervous system accounts for these differently when making decisions: they account for internal uncertainty but under-account for external. Human perceptual systems may be well equipped to account for intrinsic (perceptual) uncertainty because, in principle, they have access to this. Accounting for external uncertainty is more challenging because this uncertainty must be learned. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Decision and control processes in multisensory perception’. The Royal Society 2023-09-25 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10404920/ /pubmed/37545308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0349 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Aston, Stacey
Nardini, Marko
Beierholm, Ulrik
Different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making
title Different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making
title_full Different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making
title_fullStr Different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making
title_full_unstemmed Different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making
title_short Different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making
title_sort different types of uncertainty in multisensory perceptual decision making
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37545308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0349
work_keys_str_mv AT astonstacey differenttypesofuncertaintyinmultisensoryperceptualdecisionmaking
AT nardinimarko differenttypesofuncertaintyinmultisensoryperceptualdecisionmaking
AT beierholmulrik differenttypesofuncertaintyinmultisensoryperceptualdecisionmaking