HISET: Hybrid interpretable strategies with ensemble techniques for respiratory sound classification

The human respiratory systems can be affected by several diseases and it is associated with distinctive sounds. For advanced biomedical signal processing, one of the most complex issues is automated respiratory sound classification. In this research, five Hybrid Interpretable Strategies with Ensemble Techniques (HISET) which are quite interesting and robust are proposed for the purpose of respiratory sounds classification. The first approach is termed as an Ensemble GSSR technique which utilizes [Formula: see text] Granger Analysis and the proposed Supportive Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (SEEMD) technique and then Support Vector Machine based Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) is used for feature selection and followed by classification with Machine Learning (ML) classifiers. The second approach proposed is the implementation of a novel Realm Revamping Sparse Representation Classification (RR-SRC) technique and third approach proposed is a Distance Metric dependent Variational Mode Decomposition (DM-VMD) with Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) classification process. The fourth approach proposed is with the usage of Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) with a Scaling Factor based Pliable Differential Evolution (SFPDE) algorithm termed as HHO-SFPDE and it is classified with ML classifiers. The fifth or the final approach proposed analyzes the application of dimensionality reduction techniques with the proposed Gray Wolf Optimization based Support Vector Classification (GWO-SVC) and another parallel approach utilizes a similar kind of analysis with the Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA) based Sparse Autoencoder. The results are examined for ICBHI dataset and the best results are shown for the 2-class classification when the analysis is carried out with Manhattan distance-based VMD-ELM reporting an accuracy of 95.39%, and for 3-class classification Euclidean distance-based VMD-ELM reported an accuracy of 90.61% and for 4-class classification, Manhattan distance-based VMD-ELM reported an accuracy of 89.27%.