Cargando…

The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department

BACKGROUND: Shock index (SI) is the ratio of heart rate (HR) to systolic blood pressure (SBP); modified SI (MSI) is the ratio of HR to mean arterial pressure; age SI (ASI) is age multiplied by SI; reverse SI (rSI) is the ratio of SBP to HR; and rSIG is rSI multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: İçer, Mustafa, Gündüz, Ercan, Akkoç, Mehmet Fatih, Polat, Dicle, Özkan, Halime, Bayrak, Tuğçe, Göger, Şilan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409920
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.29677
_version_ 1785085431136649216
author İçer, Mustafa
Gündüz, Ercan
Akkoç, Mehmet Fatih
Polat, Dicle
Özkan, Halime
Bayrak, Tuğçe
Göger, Şilan
author_facet İçer, Mustafa
Gündüz, Ercan
Akkoç, Mehmet Fatih
Polat, Dicle
Özkan, Halime
Bayrak, Tuğçe
Göger, Şilan
author_sort İçer, Mustafa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shock index (SI) is the ratio of heart rate (HR) to systolic blood pressure (SBP); modified SI (MSI) is the ratio of HR to mean arterial pressure; age SI (ASI) is age multiplied by SI; reverse SI (rSI) is the ratio of SBP to HR; and rSIG is rSI multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG). Studies have proven that shock indices are good tools in predicting mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the shock indices SI, MSI, ASI, rSI, and rSIG in predicting mortality in burn patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. The vital signs of the patients were recorded and their shock indices were calculated at the time of emergency department admission. The effectiveness of the shock indices SI, MSI, ASI, rSI, and rSIG in predicting mortality was compared in the burn patients included in the study RESULTS: A total of 913 patients were enrolled. rSIG and MSI were the shock indices with the highest area under the curve (AUC) values in predicting mortality in the burn patients. The AUC values of rSIG and MSI were 0.829 (95% CI: 0.739–0.919, P<0.001) and 0.740 (95% CI: 0.643–0.838, P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Vital signs are easily recorded and shock indices are easily calculated at the time of admission of burn patients to the emergency department; they also effectively predict mortality. rSIG and MSI are the best mortality predictors among the shock indices examined in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10405026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104050262023-08-08 The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department İçer, Mustafa Gündüz, Ercan Akkoç, Mehmet Fatih Polat, Dicle Özkan, Halime Bayrak, Tuğçe Göger, Şilan Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: Shock index (SI) is the ratio of heart rate (HR) to systolic blood pressure (SBP); modified SI (MSI) is the ratio of HR to mean arterial pressure; age SI (ASI) is age multiplied by SI; reverse SI (rSI) is the ratio of SBP to HR; and rSIG is rSI multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG). Studies have proven that shock indices are good tools in predicting mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the shock indices SI, MSI, ASI, rSI, and rSIG in predicting mortality in burn patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. The vital signs of the patients were recorded and their shock indices were calculated at the time of emergency department admission. The effectiveness of the shock indices SI, MSI, ASI, rSI, and rSIG in predicting mortality was compared in the burn patients included in the study RESULTS: A total of 913 patients were enrolled. rSIG and MSI were the shock indices with the highest area under the curve (AUC) values in predicting mortality in the burn patients. The AUC values of rSIG and MSI were 0.829 (95% CI: 0.739–0.919, P<0.001) and 0.740 (95% CI: 0.643–0.838, P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Vital signs are easily recorded and shock indices are easily calculated at the time of admission of burn patients to the emergency department; they also effectively predict mortality. rSIG and MSI are the best mortality predictors among the shock indices examined in this study. Kare Publishing 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10405026/ /pubmed/37409920 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.29677 Text en Copyright © 2023 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
İçer, Mustafa
Gündüz, Ercan
Akkoç, Mehmet Fatih
Polat, Dicle
Özkan, Halime
Bayrak, Tuğçe
Göger, Şilan
The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department
title The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department
title_full The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department
title_fullStr The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department
title_short The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department
title_sort effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409920
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.29677
work_keys_str_mv AT icermustafa theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT gunduzercan theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT akkocmehmetfatih theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT polatdicle theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT ozkanhalime theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT bayraktugce theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT gogersilan theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT icermustafa effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT gunduzercan effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT akkocmehmetfatih effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT polatdicle effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT ozkanhalime effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT bayraktugce effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment
AT gogersilan effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment