Cargando…
The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department
BACKGROUND: Shock index (SI) is the ratio of heart rate (HR) to systolic blood pressure (SBP); modified SI (MSI) is the ratio of HR to mean arterial pressure; age SI (ASI) is age multiplied by SI; reverse SI (rSI) is the ratio of SBP to HR; and rSIG is rSI multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kare Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409920 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.29677 |
_version_ | 1785085431136649216 |
---|---|
author | İçer, Mustafa Gündüz, Ercan Akkoç, Mehmet Fatih Polat, Dicle Özkan, Halime Bayrak, Tuğçe Göger, Şilan |
author_facet | İçer, Mustafa Gündüz, Ercan Akkoç, Mehmet Fatih Polat, Dicle Özkan, Halime Bayrak, Tuğçe Göger, Şilan |
author_sort | İçer, Mustafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Shock index (SI) is the ratio of heart rate (HR) to systolic blood pressure (SBP); modified SI (MSI) is the ratio of HR to mean arterial pressure; age SI (ASI) is age multiplied by SI; reverse SI (rSI) is the ratio of SBP to HR; and rSIG is rSI multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG). Studies have proven that shock indices are good tools in predicting mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the shock indices SI, MSI, ASI, rSI, and rSIG in predicting mortality in burn patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. The vital signs of the patients were recorded and their shock indices were calculated at the time of emergency department admission. The effectiveness of the shock indices SI, MSI, ASI, rSI, and rSIG in predicting mortality was compared in the burn patients included in the study RESULTS: A total of 913 patients were enrolled. rSIG and MSI were the shock indices with the highest area under the curve (AUC) values in predicting mortality in the burn patients. The AUC values of rSIG and MSI were 0.829 (95% CI: 0.739–0.919, P<0.001) and 0.740 (95% CI: 0.643–0.838, P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Vital signs are easily recorded and shock indices are easily calculated at the time of admission of burn patients to the emergency department; they also effectively predict mortality. rSIG and MSI are the best mortality predictors among the shock indices examined in this study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10405026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Kare Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104050262023-08-08 The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department İçer, Mustafa Gündüz, Ercan Akkoç, Mehmet Fatih Polat, Dicle Özkan, Halime Bayrak, Tuğçe Göger, Şilan Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: Shock index (SI) is the ratio of heart rate (HR) to systolic blood pressure (SBP); modified SI (MSI) is the ratio of HR to mean arterial pressure; age SI (ASI) is age multiplied by SI; reverse SI (rSI) is the ratio of SBP to HR; and rSIG is rSI multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale Score (rSIG). Studies have proven that shock indices are good tools in predicting mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of the shock indices SI, MSI, ASI, rSI, and rSIG in predicting mortality in burn patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. The vital signs of the patients were recorded and their shock indices were calculated at the time of emergency department admission. The effectiveness of the shock indices SI, MSI, ASI, rSI, and rSIG in predicting mortality was compared in the burn patients included in the study RESULTS: A total of 913 patients were enrolled. rSIG and MSI were the shock indices with the highest area under the curve (AUC) values in predicting mortality in the burn patients. The AUC values of rSIG and MSI were 0.829 (95% CI: 0.739–0.919, P<0.001) and 0.740 (95% CI: 0.643–0.838, P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Vital signs are easily recorded and shock indices are easily calculated at the time of admission of burn patients to the emergency department; they also effectively predict mortality. rSIG and MSI are the best mortality predictors among the shock indices examined in this study. Kare Publishing 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10405026/ /pubmed/37409920 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.29677 Text en Copyright © 2023 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Article İçer, Mustafa Gündüz, Ercan Akkoç, Mehmet Fatih Polat, Dicle Özkan, Halime Bayrak, Tuğçe Göger, Şilan The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department |
title | The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department |
title_full | The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department |
title_short | The effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department |
title_sort | effectiveness of shock indices on prognosis in burn patients admitted to the emergency department |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409920 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.29677 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT icermustafa theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT gunduzercan theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT akkocmehmetfatih theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT polatdicle theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT ozkanhalime theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT bayraktugce theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT gogersilan theeffectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT icermustafa effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT gunduzercan effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT akkocmehmetfatih effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT polatdicle effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT ozkanhalime effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT bayraktugce effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment AT gogersilan effectivenessofshockindicesonprognosisinburnpatientsadmittedtotheemergencydepartment |