Cargando…

Comparison of open and closed burn wound dressing applications with tissue culture sampling

BACKGROUND: Secondary infections are the leading cause of death in burn patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of open and closed burn dressings on the development of secondary infections. METHODS: Tissue cultures were obtained from the burn sites of 56 patients between the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuncal, Salih, Altıner, Saygın, Ergüder, Ender, Büyükkasap, Ahmet Çağrı, Kuşabbi, Rifat, Ünal, Yılmaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409922
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.78662
_version_ 1785085432133844992
author Tuncal, Salih
Altıner, Saygın
Ergüder, Ender
Büyükkasap, Ahmet Çağrı
Kuşabbi, Rifat
Ünal, Yılmaz
author_facet Tuncal, Salih
Altıner, Saygın
Ergüder, Ender
Büyükkasap, Ahmet Çağrı
Kuşabbi, Rifat
Ünal, Yılmaz
author_sort Tuncal, Salih
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Secondary infections are the leading cause of death in burn patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of open and closed burn dressings on the development of secondary infections. METHODS: Tissue cultures were obtained from the burn sites of 56 patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who were admitted to our burn unit between December 2022 and January 2023, on days 3 and 7. The impact of the demographic features of the patients, the characteristics of the burn wound, the dressing type, and the first intervention strategies given to the burn wound on the development of wound infection were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the open- and closed-dressing groups in terms of cultural positivity (P>0.05). A statistically significant difference (P=0.019) was found between the groups in terms of culture positivity among those whose wounds were cleansed with warm water as the initial intervention after a burn and those whose wounds were not. CONCLUSION: Even though the main impacts of the patient’s variables on the development of a wound infection are recognized, it has been found that the appropriate and successful first intervention in a burn wound is also quite important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10405029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104050292023-08-08 Comparison of open and closed burn wound dressing applications with tissue culture sampling Tuncal, Salih Altıner, Saygın Ergüder, Ender Büyükkasap, Ahmet Çağrı Kuşabbi, Rifat Ünal, Yılmaz Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: Secondary infections are the leading cause of death in burn patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of open and closed burn dressings on the development of secondary infections. METHODS: Tissue cultures were obtained from the burn sites of 56 patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who were admitted to our burn unit between December 2022 and January 2023, on days 3 and 7. The impact of the demographic features of the patients, the characteristics of the burn wound, the dressing type, and the first intervention strategies given to the burn wound on the development of wound infection were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the open- and closed-dressing groups in terms of cultural positivity (P>0.05). A statistically significant difference (P=0.019) was found between the groups in terms of culture positivity among those whose wounds were cleansed with warm water as the initial intervention after a burn and those whose wounds were not. CONCLUSION: Even though the main impacts of the patient’s variables on the development of a wound infection are recognized, it has been found that the appropriate and successful first intervention in a burn wound is also quite important. Kare Publishing 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10405029/ /pubmed/37409922 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.78662 Text en Copyright © 2023 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Tuncal, Salih
Altıner, Saygın
Ergüder, Ender
Büyükkasap, Ahmet Çağrı
Kuşabbi, Rifat
Ünal, Yılmaz
Comparison of open and closed burn wound dressing applications with tissue culture sampling
title Comparison of open and closed burn wound dressing applications with tissue culture sampling
title_full Comparison of open and closed burn wound dressing applications with tissue culture sampling
title_fullStr Comparison of open and closed burn wound dressing applications with tissue culture sampling
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of open and closed burn wound dressing applications with tissue culture sampling
title_short Comparison of open and closed burn wound dressing applications with tissue culture sampling
title_sort comparison of open and closed burn wound dressing applications with tissue culture sampling
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409922
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.78662
work_keys_str_mv AT tuncalsalih comparisonofopenandclosedburnwounddressingapplicationswithtissueculturesampling
AT altınersaygın comparisonofopenandclosedburnwounddressingapplicationswithtissueculturesampling
AT erguderender comparisonofopenandclosedburnwounddressingapplicationswithtissueculturesampling
AT buyukkasapahmetcagrı comparisonofopenandclosedburnwounddressingapplicationswithtissueculturesampling
AT kusabbirifat comparisonofopenandclosedburnwounddressingapplicationswithtissueculturesampling
AT unalyılmaz comparisonofopenandclosedburnwounddressingapplicationswithtissueculturesampling