Cargando…

Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the radiological parameters of developing subsequent contralateral slips in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients at the time of initial presentation. METHODS: The study group included the review of unilateral SCFE patients treated between June...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akpinar, Evren, Sevencan, Ahmet, Nuri Ozyalvac, Osman, Onder, Murat, Bilal Kurk, Muhammed, Alpay, Yakup, Bayhan, Ilhan Avni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409921
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.91038
_version_ 1785085432392843264
author Akpinar, Evren
Sevencan, Ahmet
Nuri Ozyalvac, Osman
Onder, Murat
Bilal Kurk, Muhammed
Alpay, Yakup
Bayhan, Ilhan Avni
author_facet Akpinar, Evren
Sevencan, Ahmet
Nuri Ozyalvac, Osman
Onder, Murat
Bilal Kurk, Muhammed
Alpay, Yakup
Bayhan, Ilhan Avni
author_sort Akpinar, Evren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the radiological parameters of developing subsequent contralateral slips in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients at the time of initial presentation. METHODS: The study group included the review of unilateral SCFE patients treated between June 2007 and August 2018. Age, gender, side, stability, posterior slope angle, grade of slip, modified Oxford bone age score (mOBAS), the Risser classification, and the appearance of the triradiate cartilage were evaluated retrospectively. Data were analyzed between two groups: subsequent contralateral SCFE (SCFESC) patients that developed contralateral slip during follow-up and unilateral SCFE (SCFEU) patients that did not develop contralateral slip up to skeletal maturity. Descriptive statistics were used to compare risk factors between groups. RESULTS: This study included 48 patients and 6 patients (12.5%) developed a SCFESC. Only mOBAS was significantly different between groups. The mOBAS scores in SCFESC were 18 in 2 patients (33.3%), 19 in 4 patients (66.7%). The mOBAS scores in SCFEU were 18 in 1 patient (2.4%), 19 in 24 patients (57.1%), and >20 in 17 patients (40.5%). In the SCFESC group, all patients had a Risser score of 0 and all had open triradiate cartilage. CONCLUSION: Patients with unilateral SCFE are at risk for SCFESC, and the mOBAS is the best predictor of risk assessment. We agree that mOBAS score of 16,17 or 18 patients’ contralateral hips can be prophylactically pinned. We also suggest pinning or close screening of mOBAS 19 patients that some carry relatively high risk of subsequent contralateral slip.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10405030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104050302023-08-08 Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients? Akpinar, Evren Sevencan, Ahmet Nuri Ozyalvac, Osman Onder, Murat Bilal Kurk, Muhammed Alpay, Yakup Bayhan, Ilhan Avni Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the radiological parameters of developing subsequent contralateral slips in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients at the time of initial presentation. METHODS: The study group included the review of unilateral SCFE patients treated between June 2007 and August 2018. Age, gender, side, stability, posterior slope angle, grade of slip, modified Oxford bone age score (mOBAS), the Risser classification, and the appearance of the triradiate cartilage were evaluated retrospectively. Data were analyzed between two groups: subsequent contralateral SCFE (SCFESC) patients that developed contralateral slip during follow-up and unilateral SCFE (SCFEU) patients that did not develop contralateral slip up to skeletal maturity. Descriptive statistics were used to compare risk factors between groups. RESULTS: This study included 48 patients and 6 patients (12.5%) developed a SCFESC. Only mOBAS was significantly different between groups. The mOBAS scores in SCFESC were 18 in 2 patients (33.3%), 19 in 4 patients (66.7%). The mOBAS scores in SCFEU were 18 in 1 patient (2.4%), 19 in 24 patients (57.1%), and >20 in 17 patients (40.5%). In the SCFESC group, all patients had a Risser score of 0 and all had open triradiate cartilage. CONCLUSION: Patients with unilateral SCFE are at risk for SCFESC, and the mOBAS is the best predictor of risk assessment. We agree that mOBAS score of 16,17 or 18 patients’ contralateral hips can be prophylactically pinned. We also suggest pinning or close screening of mOBAS 19 patients that some carry relatively high risk of subsequent contralateral slip. Kare Publishing 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10405030/ /pubmed/37409921 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.91038 Text en Copyright © 2023 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Akpinar, Evren
Sevencan, Ahmet
Nuri Ozyalvac, Osman
Onder, Murat
Bilal Kurk, Muhammed
Alpay, Yakup
Bayhan, Ilhan Avni
Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?
title Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?
title_full Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?
title_fullStr Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?
title_full_unstemmed Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?
title_short Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?
title_sort which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral scfe patients?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409921
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.91038
work_keys_str_mv AT akpinarevren whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients
AT sevencanahmet whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients
AT nuriozyalvacosman whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients
AT ondermurat whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients
AT bilalkurkmuhammed whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients
AT alpayyakup whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients
AT bayhanilhanavni whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients