Cargando…
Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients?
BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the radiological parameters of developing subsequent contralateral slips in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients at the time of initial presentation. METHODS: The study group included the review of unilateral SCFE patients treated between June...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kare Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409921 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.91038 |
_version_ | 1785085432392843264 |
---|---|
author | Akpinar, Evren Sevencan, Ahmet Nuri Ozyalvac, Osman Onder, Murat Bilal Kurk, Muhammed Alpay, Yakup Bayhan, Ilhan Avni |
author_facet | Akpinar, Evren Sevencan, Ahmet Nuri Ozyalvac, Osman Onder, Murat Bilal Kurk, Muhammed Alpay, Yakup Bayhan, Ilhan Avni |
author_sort | Akpinar, Evren |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the radiological parameters of developing subsequent contralateral slips in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients at the time of initial presentation. METHODS: The study group included the review of unilateral SCFE patients treated between June 2007 and August 2018. Age, gender, side, stability, posterior slope angle, grade of slip, modified Oxford bone age score (mOBAS), the Risser classification, and the appearance of the triradiate cartilage were evaluated retrospectively. Data were analyzed between two groups: subsequent contralateral SCFE (SCFESC) patients that developed contralateral slip during follow-up and unilateral SCFE (SCFEU) patients that did not develop contralateral slip up to skeletal maturity. Descriptive statistics were used to compare risk factors between groups. RESULTS: This study included 48 patients and 6 patients (12.5%) developed a SCFESC. Only mOBAS was significantly different between groups. The mOBAS scores in SCFESC were 18 in 2 patients (33.3%), 19 in 4 patients (66.7%). The mOBAS scores in SCFEU were 18 in 1 patient (2.4%), 19 in 24 patients (57.1%), and >20 in 17 patients (40.5%). In the SCFESC group, all patients had a Risser score of 0 and all had open triradiate cartilage. CONCLUSION: Patients with unilateral SCFE are at risk for SCFESC, and the mOBAS is the best predictor of risk assessment. We agree that mOBAS score of 16,17 or 18 patients’ contralateral hips can be prophylactically pinned. We also suggest pinning or close screening of mOBAS 19 patients that some carry relatively high risk of subsequent contralateral slip. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10405030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Kare Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104050302023-08-08 Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients? Akpinar, Evren Sevencan, Ahmet Nuri Ozyalvac, Osman Onder, Murat Bilal Kurk, Muhammed Alpay, Yakup Bayhan, Ilhan Avni Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the radiological parameters of developing subsequent contralateral slips in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) patients at the time of initial presentation. METHODS: The study group included the review of unilateral SCFE patients treated between June 2007 and August 2018. Age, gender, side, stability, posterior slope angle, grade of slip, modified Oxford bone age score (mOBAS), the Risser classification, and the appearance of the triradiate cartilage were evaluated retrospectively. Data were analyzed between two groups: subsequent contralateral SCFE (SCFESC) patients that developed contralateral slip during follow-up and unilateral SCFE (SCFEU) patients that did not develop contralateral slip up to skeletal maturity. Descriptive statistics were used to compare risk factors between groups. RESULTS: This study included 48 patients and 6 patients (12.5%) developed a SCFESC. Only mOBAS was significantly different between groups. The mOBAS scores in SCFESC were 18 in 2 patients (33.3%), 19 in 4 patients (66.7%). The mOBAS scores in SCFEU were 18 in 1 patient (2.4%), 19 in 24 patients (57.1%), and >20 in 17 patients (40.5%). In the SCFESC group, all patients had a Risser score of 0 and all had open triradiate cartilage. CONCLUSION: Patients with unilateral SCFE are at risk for SCFESC, and the mOBAS is the best predictor of risk assessment. We agree that mOBAS score of 16,17 or 18 patients’ contralateral hips can be prophylactically pinned. We also suggest pinning or close screening of mOBAS 19 patients that some carry relatively high risk of subsequent contralateral slip. Kare Publishing 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10405030/ /pubmed/37409921 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.91038 Text en Copyright © 2023 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Akpinar, Evren Sevencan, Ahmet Nuri Ozyalvac, Osman Onder, Murat Bilal Kurk, Muhammed Alpay, Yakup Bayhan, Ilhan Avni Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients? |
title | Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients? |
title_full | Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients? |
title_fullStr | Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients? |
title_short | Which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral SCFE patients? |
title_sort | which factor is more reliable considering prophylactic pinning of contralateral hip of unilateral scfe patients? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37409921 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.91038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akpinarevren whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients AT sevencanahmet whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients AT nuriozyalvacosman whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients AT ondermurat whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients AT bilalkurkmuhammed whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients AT alpayyakup whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients AT bayhanilhanavni whichfactorismorereliableconsideringprophylacticpinningofcontralateralhipofunilateralscfepatients |