Cargando…

Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in adult patients receiving gastrectomy/colorectal resection: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture promotes the recovery of gastrointestinal function and provides analgesia after major abdominal surgery. The effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) remain unclear. AIM: To explore the potential effects of TEAS on the recovery of gastrointestinal func...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Yuan-Tao, Pan, Yuan-Yuan, Wan, Lei, Zhao, Wen-Sheng, Luo, Ying, Yan, Qi, Zhang, Yi, Zhang, Wei-Xin, Mo, Yun-Chang, Huang, Lu-Ping, Dai, Qin-Xue, Jia, Dan-Yun, Yang, Ai-Ming, An, Hai-Yan, Wu, An-Shi, Tian, Ming, Fang, Jian-Qiao, Wang, Jun-Lu, Feng, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37555116
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1474
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Acupuncture promotes the recovery of gastrointestinal function and provides analgesia after major abdominal surgery. The effects of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) remain unclear. AIM: To explore the potential effects of TEAS on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after gastrectomy and colorectal resection. METHODS: Patients scheduled for gastrectomy or colorectal resection were randomized at a 2:3:3:2 ratio to receive: (1) TEAS at maximum tolerable current for 30 min immediately prior to anesthesia induction and for the entire duration of surgery, plus two 30-min daily sessions for 3 consecutive days after surgery (perioperative TEAS group); (2) Preoperative and intraoperative TEAS only; (3) Preoperative and postoperative TEAS only; or (4) Sham stimulation. The primary outcome was the time from the end of surgery to the first bowel sound. RESULTS: In total, 441 patients were randomized; 405 patients (58.4 ± 10.2 years of age; 247 males) received the planned surgery. The time to the first bowel sounds did not differ among the four groups (P = 0.90; log-rank test). On postoperative day 1, the rest pain scores differed significantly among the four groups (P = 0.04; Kruskal–Wallis test). Post hoc comparison using the Bonferroni test showed lower pain scores in the perioperative TEAS group (1.4 ± 1.2) than in the sham stimulation group (1.7 ± 1.1; P = 0.04). Surgical complications did not differ among the four groups. CONCLUSION: TEAS provided analgesic effects in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, and it can be added to clinical practice as a means of accelerating postoperative rehabilitation of these patients.