Cargando…
Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women
BACKGROUND: Breast density is strongly associated with breast cancer risk. Fully automated quantitative density assessment methods have recently been developed that could facilitate large-scale studies, although data on associations with long-term breast cancer risk are limited. We examined LIBRA as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37544983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01685-6 |
_version_ | 1785085512806039552 |
---|---|
author | Habel, Laurel A. Alexeeff, Stacey E. Achacoso, Ninah Arasu, Vignesh A. Gastounioti, Aimilia Gerstley, Lawrence Klein, Robert J. Liang, Rhea Y. Lipson, Jafi A. Mankowski, Walter Margolies, Laurie R. Rothstein, Joseph H. Rubin, Daniel L. Shen, Li Sistig, Adriana Song, Xiaoyu Villaseñor, Marvella A. Westley, Mark Whittemore, Alice S. Yaffe, Martin J. Wang, Pei Kontos, Despina Sieh, Weiva |
author_facet | Habel, Laurel A. Alexeeff, Stacey E. Achacoso, Ninah Arasu, Vignesh A. Gastounioti, Aimilia Gerstley, Lawrence Klein, Robert J. Liang, Rhea Y. Lipson, Jafi A. Mankowski, Walter Margolies, Laurie R. Rothstein, Joseph H. Rubin, Daniel L. Shen, Li Sistig, Adriana Song, Xiaoyu Villaseñor, Marvella A. Westley, Mark Whittemore, Alice S. Yaffe, Martin J. Wang, Pei Kontos, Despina Sieh, Weiva |
author_sort | Habel, Laurel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Breast density is strongly associated with breast cancer risk. Fully automated quantitative density assessment methods have recently been developed that could facilitate large-scale studies, although data on associations with long-term breast cancer risk are limited. We examined LIBRA assessments and breast cancer risk and compared results to prior assessments using Cumulus, an established computer-assisted method requiring manual thresholding. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study among 21,150 non-Hispanic white female participants of the Research Program in Genes, Environment and Health of Kaiser Permanente Northern California who were 40–74 years at enrollment, followed for up to 10 years, and had archived processed screening mammograms acquired on Hologic or General Electric full-field digital mammography (FFDM) machines and prior Cumulus density assessments available for analysis. Dense area (DA), non-dense area (NDA), and percent density (PD) were assessed using LIBRA software. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for breast cancer associated with DA, NDA and PD modeled continuously in standard deviation (SD) increments, adjusting for age, mammogram year, body mass index, parity, first-degree family history of breast cancer, and menopausal hormone use. We also examined differences by machine type and breast view. RESULTS: The adjusted HRs for breast cancer associated with each SD increment of DA, NDA and PD were 1.36 (95% confidence interval, 1.18–1.57), 0.85 (0.77–0.93) and 1.44 (1.26–1.66) for LIBRA and 1.44 (1.33–1.55), 0.81 (0.74–0.89) and 1.54 (1.34–1.77) for Cumulus, respectively. LIBRA results were generally similar by machine type and breast view, although associations were strongest for Hologic machines and mediolateral oblique views. Results were also similar during the first 2 years, 2–5 years and 5–10 years after the baseline mammogram. CONCLUSION: Associations with breast cancer risk were generally similar for LIBRA and Cumulus density measures and were sustained for up to 10 years. These findings support the suitability of fully automated LIBRA assessments on processed FFDM images for large-scale research on breast density and cancer risk. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-023-01685-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10405373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104053732023-08-08 Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women Habel, Laurel A. Alexeeff, Stacey E. Achacoso, Ninah Arasu, Vignesh A. Gastounioti, Aimilia Gerstley, Lawrence Klein, Robert J. Liang, Rhea Y. Lipson, Jafi A. Mankowski, Walter Margolies, Laurie R. Rothstein, Joseph H. Rubin, Daniel L. Shen, Li Sistig, Adriana Song, Xiaoyu Villaseñor, Marvella A. Westley, Mark Whittemore, Alice S. Yaffe, Martin J. Wang, Pei Kontos, Despina Sieh, Weiva Breast Cancer Res Research BACKGROUND: Breast density is strongly associated with breast cancer risk. Fully automated quantitative density assessment methods have recently been developed that could facilitate large-scale studies, although data on associations with long-term breast cancer risk are limited. We examined LIBRA assessments and breast cancer risk and compared results to prior assessments using Cumulus, an established computer-assisted method requiring manual thresholding. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study among 21,150 non-Hispanic white female participants of the Research Program in Genes, Environment and Health of Kaiser Permanente Northern California who were 40–74 years at enrollment, followed for up to 10 years, and had archived processed screening mammograms acquired on Hologic or General Electric full-field digital mammography (FFDM) machines and prior Cumulus density assessments available for analysis. Dense area (DA), non-dense area (NDA), and percent density (PD) were assessed using LIBRA software. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for breast cancer associated with DA, NDA and PD modeled continuously in standard deviation (SD) increments, adjusting for age, mammogram year, body mass index, parity, first-degree family history of breast cancer, and menopausal hormone use. We also examined differences by machine type and breast view. RESULTS: The adjusted HRs for breast cancer associated with each SD increment of DA, NDA and PD were 1.36 (95% confidence interval, 1.18–1.57), 0.85 (0.77–0.93) and 1.44 (1.26–1.66) for LIBRA and 1.44 (1.33–1.55), 0.81 (0.74–0.89) and 1.54 (1.34–1.77) for Cumulus, respectively. LIBRA results were generally similar by machine type and breast view, although associations were strongest for Hologic machines and mediolateral oblique views. Results were also similar during the first 2 years, 2–5 years and 5–10 years after the baseline mammogram. CONCLUSION: Associations with breast cancer risk were generally similar for LIBRA and Cumulus density measures and were sustained for up to 10 years. These findings support the suitability of fully automated LIBRA assessments on processed FFDM images for large-scale research on breast density and cancer risk. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-023-01685-6. BioMed Central 2023-08-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10405373/ /pubmed/37544983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01685-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Habel, Laurel A. Alexeeff, Stacey E. Achacoso, Ninah Arasu, Vignesh A. Gastounioti, Aimilia Gerstley, Lawrence Klein, Robert J. Liang, Rhea Y. Lipson, Jafi A. Mankowski, Walter Margolies, Laurie R. Rothstein, Joseph H. Rubin, Daniel L. Shen, Li Sistig, Adriana Song, Xiaoyu Villaseñor, Marvella A. Westley, Mark Whittemore, Alice S. Yaffe, Martin J. Wang, Pei Kontos, Despina Sieh, Weiva Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women |
title | Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women |
title_full | Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women |
title_fullStr | Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women |
title_full_unstemmed | Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women |
title_short | Examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using LIBRA and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-Hispanic white women |
title_sort | examination of fully automated mammographic density measures using libra and breast cancer risk in a cohort of 21,000 non-hispanic white women |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37544983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01685-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT habellaurela examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT alexeeffstaceye examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT achacosoninah examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT arasuvignesha examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT gastouniotiaimilia examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT gerstleylawrence examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT kleinrobertj examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT liangrheay examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT lipsonjafia examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT mankowskiwalter examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT margolieslaurier examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT rothsteinjosephh examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT rubindaniell examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT shenli examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT sistigadriana examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT songxiaoyu examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT villasenormarvellaa examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT westleymark examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT whittemorealices examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT yaffemartinj examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT wangpei examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT kontosdespina examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen AT siehweiva examinationoffullyautomatedmammographicdensitymeasuresusinglibraandbreastcancerriskinacohortof21000nonhispanicwhitewomen |