Content validity of the Post-Stroke Guidance and Follow-up Booklet

OBJECTIVES: to provide sources of content validity evidence for the Post-Stroke Guidance and Follow-up Booklet. METHODS: a quantitative-qualitative approach, using two Delphi method and content analysis rounds. The Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health was sent to 53 independent judges...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasconcelos, Bruna Fonseca, Vilhena, Douglas de Araújo, Vasconcelos, Luísa Fonseca, Corrêa, Paula Mariana Munno Guimarães, da Costa, Magnania Cristiane Pereira, Santos, Juliana Nunes, Machado, Thaís Peixoto Gaiad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem 2023
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37556694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0532
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: to provide sources of content validity evidence for the Post-Stroke Guidance and Follow-up Booklet. METHODS: a quantitative-qualitative approach, using two Delphi method and content analysis rounds. The Educational Content Validation Instrument in Health was sent to 53 independent judges. A Content Validity Index above 0.90 was considered. RESULTS: of the 14 nurses who participated, 64.3% have experience with stroke care, 35.7% with primary care and 64.3% with educational material production. In content analysis, judges’ suggestions were stratified into four categories: material conformation, objectivity, accuracy and perception. Spelling changes were made to the images, addition of functionality scale, adequacy of technical terms and language. The Content Validity Index in the second round showed a concordance of 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: the booklet presented satisfactory content validity sources of evidence.

Ejemplares similares