Cargando…
Development of the national Dutch PEWS: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of PEWS in the Netherlands
BACKGROUND: For the early recognition of deteriorating patients several Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) systems have been developed with the assumption that early detection can prevent further deterioration. Although PEWS are widely being used in hospitals in the Netherlands, there is no nation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04219-3 |
_version_ | 1785085530267975680 |
---|---|
author | Fuijkschot, Joris Stevens, Jikke Teheux, Lara de Loos, Erica Rippen, Hester Meurs, Maaike de Groot, Janke |
author_facet | Fuijkschot, Joris Stevens, Jikke Teheux, Lara de Loos, Erica Rippen, Hester Meurs, Maaike de Groot, Janke |
author_sort | Fuijkschot, Joris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For the early recognition of deteriorating patients several Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) systems have been developed with the assumption that early detection can prevent further deterioration. Although PEWS are widely being used in hospitals in the Netherlands, there is no national consensus on which score to use and how to embed the score into a PEWS system. This resulted in a substantial heterogeneity of PEWS systems, of which many are unvalidated or self-designed. The primary objective of this study was to develop a pragmatic consensus-based PEWS system that can be utilized in all Dutch hospitals (University Medical Centers, teaching hospitals, and general hospitals). METHODS: This study is an iterative mixed-methods study. The methods from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative were used and consisted of two Delphi rounds, two inventories set out to all Dutch hospitals and a focus group session with parents. The study was guided by five expert meetings with different stakeholders and a final consensus meeting that resulted in a core PEWS set. RESULTS: The first Delphi round was completed by 292 healthcare professionals, consisting of pediatric nurses and physicians. In the second Delphi round 217 healthcare professionals participated. Eventually, the core PEWS set was been developed comprising of the parameters work of breathing, respiratory rate, oxygen therapy, heart rate and capillary refill time, and AVPU (Alert, Verbal, Pain, and Unresponsive). In addition, risk stratification was added to the core set with standardized risk factors consisting of [1] worried signs from healthcare professionals and parents and [2] high-risk treatment, with the option to add applicable local defined risk factors. Lastly, the three categories of risk stratification were defined (standard, medium, and high risk) in combination with standardized actions of the professionals for each category. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a way to end a country’s struggle with PEWS heterogeneity by co-designing a national Dutch PEWS system. Currently, the power of the system is being investigated in a large multi-center study in the Netherlands. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-023-04219-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10405440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104054402023-08-08 Development of the national Dutch PEWS: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of PEWS in the Netherlands Fuijkschot, Joris Stevens, Jikke Teheux, Lara de Loos, Erica Rippen, Hester Meurs, Maaike de Groot, Janke BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: For the early recognition of deteriorating patients several Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) systems have been developed with the assumption that early detection can prevent further deterioration. Although PEWS are widely being used in hospitals in the Netherlands, there is no national consensus on which score to use and how to embed the score into a PEWS system. This resulted in a substantial heterogeneity of PEWS systems, of which many are unvalidated or self-designed. The primary objective of this study was to develop a pragmatic consensus-based PEWS system that can be utilized in all Dutch hospitals (University Medical Centers, teaching hospitals, and general hospitals). METHODS: This study is an iterative mixed-methods study. The methods from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative were used and consisted of two Delphi rounds, two inventories set out to all Dutch hospitals and a focus group session with parents. The study was guided by five expert meetings with different stakeholders and a final consensus meeting that resulted in a core PEWS set. RESULTS: The first Delphi round was completed by 292 healthcare professionals, consisting of pediatric nurses and physicians. In the second Delphi round 217 healthcare professionals participated. Eventually, the core PEWS set was been developed comprising of the parameters work of breathing, respiratory rate, oxygen therapy, heart rate and capillary refill time, and AVPU (Alert, Verbal, Pain, and Unresponsive). In addition, risk stratification was added to the core set with standardized risk factors consisting of [1] worried signs from healthcare professionals and parents and [2] high-risk treatment, with the option to add applicable local defined risk factors. Lastly, the three categories of risk stratification were defined (standard, medium, and high risk) in combination with standardized actions of the professionals for each category. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a way to end a country’s struggle with PEWS heterogeneity by co-designing a national Dutch PEWS system. Currently, the power of the system is being investigated in a large multi-center study in the Netherlands. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-023-04219-3. BioMed Central 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10405440/ /pubmed/37550704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04219-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Fuijkschot, Joris Stevens, Jikke Teheux, Lara de Loos, Erica Rippen, Hester Meurs, Maaike de Groot, Janke Development of the national Dutch PEWS: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of PEWS in the Netherlands |
title | Development of the national Dutch PEWS: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of PEWS in the Netherlands |
title_full | Development of the national Dutch PEWS: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of PEWS in the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Development of the national Dutch PEWS: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of PEWS in the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the national Dutch PEWS: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of PEWS in the Netherlands |
title_short | Development of the national Dutch PEWS: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of PEWS in the Netherlands |
title_sort | development of the national dutch pews: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of pews in the netherlands |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04219-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuijkschotjoris developmentofthenationaldutchpewsthechallengeagainstheterogeneityandimplementationdifficultiesofpewsinthenetherlands AT stevensjikke developmentofthenationaldutchpewsthechallengeagainstheterogeneityandimplementationdifficultiesofpewsinthenetherlands AT teheuxlara developmentofthenationaldutchpewsthechallengeagainstheterogeneityandimplementationdifficultiesofpewsinthenetherlands AT delooserica developmentofthenationaldutchpewsthechallengeagainstheterogeneityandimplementationdifficultiesofpewsinthenetherlands AT rippenhester developmentofthenationaldutchpewsthechallengeagainstheterogeneityandimplementationdifficultiesofpewsinthenetherlands AT meursmaaike developmentofthenationaldutchpewsthechallengeagainstheterogeneityandimplementationdifficultiesofpewsinthenetherlands AT degrootjanke developmentofthenationaldutchpewsthechallengeagainstheterogeneityandimplementationdifficultiesofpewsinthenetherlands |