Cargando…
Objective cognitive functioning in patients with stress-related disorders: a cross-sectional study using remote digital cognitive testing
BACKGROUND: Patients with stress-related mental disorders often report cognitive impairment, but studies investigating objective cognitive impairment in patients with stress-related disorders have produced inconsistent findings. AIM: The primary aim of this study was to investigate objective cogniti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05048-5 |
_version_ | 1785085536174604288 |
---|---|
author | Franke Föyen, Ludwig Sennerstam, Victoria Kontio, Evelina Lekander, Mats Hedman-Lagerlöf, Erik Lindsäter, Elin |
author_facet | Franke Föyen, Ludwig Sennerstam, Victoria Kontio, Evelina Lekander, Mats Hedman-Lagerlöf, Erik Lindsäter, Elin |
author_sort | Franke Föyen, Ludwig |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with stress-related mental disorders often report cognitive impairment, but studies investigating objective cognitive impairment in patients with stress-related disorders have produced inconsistent findings. AIM: The primary aim of this study was to investigate objective cognitive functioning in patients diagnosed with the stress-related disorders adjustment disorder or exhaustion disorder, compared to a healthy normative group. Secondary aims were to conduct subgroup analyses of cognitive functioning between the diagnostic groups and explore associations between self-reported symptoms and cognitive functioning. METHODS: Cognitive test results on a digitally self-administered cognitive test battery from 266 patients (adjustment disorder, n = 131; exhaustion disorder, n = 135) were cross-sectionally compared with results from a healthy normative group (N = 184 to 692) using one-tailed t-tests. ANOVAs were conducted for subgroup analyses, and regression analyses for associations between self-reported symptoms and cognitive functioning. Effect sizes were calculated. RESULTS: Patients performed significantly worse than the normative group on all measures with small to moderate effect sizes ranging from d = -.13 to -.57. Those diagnosed with exhaustion disorder performed worse than norms on more measures than did patients with adjustment disorder, but no significant differences between diagnostic groups were found on any measure. Self-reported memory impairment was weakly associated with one of two memory measures. No clear associations between self-reported burnout symptoms and objective cognitive functioning were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the literature indicative of small to moderate objective cognitive impairments in patients diagnosed with stress-related mental disorders. Further exploration into mechanisms of cognitive functioning in different populations is needed for development of theoretical models that may explain the weak correlation between self-reported symptoms and objective measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04797273. Trial registration date 15 March 2021. This study was also pre-registered on Open Science Framework (osf.io) with https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TQXZV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-05048-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10405463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104054632023-08-08 Objective cognitive functioning in patients with stress-related disorders: a cross-sectional study using remote digital cognitive testing Franke Föyen, Ludwig Sennerstam, Victoria Kontio, Evelina Lekander, Mats Hedman-Lagerlöf, Erik Lindsäter, Elin BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Patients with stress-related mental disorders often report cognitive impairment, but studies investigating objective cognitive impairment in patients with stress-related disorders have produced inconsistent findings. AIM: The primary aim of this study was to investigate objective cognitive functioning in patients diagnosed with the stress-related disorders adjustment disorder or exhaustion disorder, compared to a healthy normative group. Secondary aims were to conduct subgroup analyses of cognitive functioning between the diagnostic groups and explore associations between self-reported symptoms and cognitive functioning. METHODS: Cognitive test results on a digitally self-administered cognitive test battery from 266 patients (adjustment disorder, n = 131; exhaustion disorder, n = 135) were cross-sectionally compared with results from a healthy normative group (N = 184 to 692) using one-tailed t-tests. ANOVAs were conducted for subgroup analyses, and regression analyses for associations between self-reported symptoms and cognitive functioning. Effect sizes were calculated. RESULTS: Patients performed significantly worse than the normative group on all measures with small to moderate effect sizes ranging from d = -.13 to -.57. Those diagnosed with exhaustion disorder performed worse than norms on more measures than did patients with adjustment disorder, but no significant differences between diagnostic groups were found on any measure. Self-reported memory impairment was weakly associated with one of two memory measures. No clear associations between self-reported burnout symptoms and objective cognitive functioning were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the literature indicative of small to moderate objective cognitive impairments in patients diagnosed with stress-related mental disorders. Further exploration into mechanisms of cognitive functioning in different populations is needed for development of theoretical models that may explain the weak correlation between self-reported symptoms and objective measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04797273. Trial registration date 15 March 2021. This study was also pre-registered on Open Science Framework (osf.io) with https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TQXZV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-05048-5. BioMed Central 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10405463/ /pubmed/37550693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05048-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Franke Föyen, Ludwig Sennerstam, Victoria Kontio, Evelina Lekander, Mats Hedman-Lagerlöf, Erik Lindsäter, Elin Objective cognitive functioning in patients with stress-related disorders: a cross-sectional study using remote digital cognitive testing |
title | Objective cognitive functioning in patients with stress-related disorders: a cross-sectional study using remote digital cognitive testing |
title_full | Objective cognitive functioning in patients with stress-related disorders: a cross-sectional study using remote digital cognitive testing |
title_fullStr | Objective cognitive functioning in patients with stress-related disorders: a cross-sectional study using remote digital cognitive testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective cognitive functioning in patients with stress-related disorders: a cross-sectional study using remote digital cognitive testing |
title_short | Objective cognitive functioning in patients with stress-related disorders: a cross-sectional study using remote digital cognitive testing |
title_sort | objective cognitive functioning in patients with stress-related disorders: a cross-sectional study using remote digital cognitive testing |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05048-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT frankefoyenludwig objectivecognitivefunctioninginpatientswithstressrelateddisordersacrosssectionalstudyusingremotedigitalcognitivetesting AT sennerstamvictoria objectivecognitivefunctioninginpatientswithstressrelateddisordersacrosssectionalstudyusingremotedigitalcognitivetesting AT kontioevelina objectivecognitivefunctioninginpatientswithstressrelateddisordersacrosssectionalstudyusingremotedigitalcognitivetesting AT lekandermats objectivecognitivefunctioninginpatientswithstressrelateddisordersacrosssectionalstudyusingremotedigitalcognitivetesting AT hedmanlagerloferik objectivecognitivefunctioninginpatientswithstressrelateddisordersacrosssectionalstudyusingremotedigitalcognitivetesting AT lindsaterelin objectivecognitivefunctioninginpatientswithstressrelateddisordersacrosssectionalstudyusingremotedigitalcognitivetesting |