Cargando…

Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), have been widely used as intravascular devices in critically ill patients. However, they might evoke complications, such as catheter colonization that has been considered as predisposing factor for centr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pitiriga, Vassiliki, Bakalis, John, Theodoridou, Kalliopi, Dimitroulia, Evangelia, Saroglou, George, Tsakris, Athanasios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01285-1
_version_ 1785085539150462976
author Pitiriga, Vassiliki
Bakalis, John
Theodoridou, Kalliopi
Dimitroulia, Evangelia
Saroglou, George
Tsakris, Athanasios
author_facet Pitiriga, Vassiliki
Bakalis, John
Theodoridou, Kalliopi
Dimitroulia, Evangelia
Saroglou, George
Tsakris, Athanasios
author_sort Pitiriga, Vassiliki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), have been widely used as intravascular devices in critically ill patients. However, they might evoke complications, such as catheter colonization that has been considered as predisposing factor for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Although numerous studies have compared the risk of bloodstream infections between PICCs and CVCs, comparative studies on their colonization rates are limited. OBJECTIVES: The episodes of catheter colonization in critically ill patients with CVCs or PICCs were retrospectively analysed during a two-year period in a Greek tertiary care hospital and colonization rates, microbial profiles and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were compared. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data of consecutive hospitalized critically-ill patients who underwent PICC and CVC placement between May 2017–May 2019 were analysed. All catheters were examined by the semiquantitative culture technique for bacterial pathogens, either as a routine process after catheter removal or after suspicion of infection. Species identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns were determined by the Vitek2 automated system. RESULTS: During the survey period a total of 122/1187 (10.28%) catheter colonization cases were identified among CVCs and 19/639 (2.97%) cases among PICCs (p = 0.001). The colonization rate was 12.48/1000 catheter-days for the CVC group and 1.71/1000 catheter-days for the PICC group (p < 0.001). The colonization rate per 1000 catheter-days due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) was 3.85 in all study cases, 7.26 (71/122) in the CVC group and 0.63 (7/19) in the PICC group (p < 0.001). Within the CVC group, the most common microorganism isolated was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 38, 31.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 20, 16.4%). In the PICC group, the predominant microorganism isolated was Candida spp. (n = 5, 23.8%) followed by MDR K. pneumoniae and MDR A. baumannii in equal numbers (n = 3, 14.2%). CONCLUSION: PICC lines were associated with significantly lower colonization rates comparing to the CVC ones. In addition, patterns of microbial colonization revealed a trend over the predominance of MDR gram-negatives in CVCs suggesting that PICCs might be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient intravascular access. Prevention programs directed by local microbial ecology may diminish catheter colonization rates and CLABSIs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10405474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104054742023-08-08 Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters Pitiriga, Vassiliki Bakalis, John Theodoridou, Kalliopi Dimitroulia, Evangelia Saroglou, George Tsakris, Athanasios Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), have been widely used as intravascular devices in critically ill patients. However, they might evoke complications, such as catheter colonization that has been considered as predisposing factor for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Although numerous studies have compared the risk of bloodstream infections between PICCs and CVCs, comparative studies on their colonization rates are limited. OBJECTIVES: The episodes of catheter colonization in critically ill patients with CVCs or PICCs were retrospectively analysed during a two-year period in a Greek tertiary care hospital and colonization rates, microbial profiles and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were compared. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data of consecutive hospitalized critically-ill patients who underwent PICC and CVC placement between May 2017–May 2019 were analysed. All catheters were examined by the semiquantitative culture technique for bacterial pathogens, either as a routine process after catheter removal or after suspicion of infection. Species identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns were determined by the Vitek2 automated system. RESULTS: During the survey period a total of 122/1187 (10.28%) catheter colonization cases were identified among CVCs and 19/639 (2.97%) cases among PICCs (p = 0.001). The colonization rate was 12.48/1000 catheter-days for the CVC group and 1.71/1000 catheter-days for the PICC group (p < 0.001). The colonization rate per 1000 catheter-days due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) was 3.85 in all study cases, 7.26 (71/122) in the CVC group and 0.63 (7/19) in the PICC group (p < 0.001). Within the CVC group, the most common microorganism isolated was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 38, 31.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 20, 16.4%). In the PICC group, the predominant microorganism isolated was Candida spp. (n = 5, 23.8%) followed by MDR K. pneumoniae and MDR A. baumannii in equal numbers (n = 3, 14.2%). CONCLUSION: PICC lines were associated with significantly lower colonization rates comparing to the CVC ones. In addition, patterns of microbial colonization revealed a trend over the predominance of MDR gram-negatives in CVCs suggesting that PICCs might be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient intravascular access. Prevention programs directed by local microbial ecology may diminish catheter colonization rates and CLABSIs. BioMed Central 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10405474/ /pubmed/37550791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01285-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pitiriga, Vassiliki
Bakalis, John
Theodoridou, Kalliopi
Dimitroulia, Evangelia
Saroglou, George
Tsakris, Athanasios
Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters
title Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters
title_full Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters
title_fullStr Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters
title_short Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters
title_sort comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01285-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pitirigavassiliki comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters
AT bakalisjohn comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters
AT theodoridoukalliopi comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters
AT dimitrouliaevangelia comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters
AT saroglougeorge comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters
AT tsakrisathanasios comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters