Cargando…
Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters
BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), have been widely used as intravascular devices in critically ill patients. However, they might evoke complications, such as catheter colonization that has been considered as predisposing factor for centr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01285-1 |
_version_ | 1785085539150462976 |
---|---|
author | Pitiriga, Vassiliki Bakalis, John Theodoridou, Kalliopi Dimitroulia, Evangelia Saroglou, George Tsakris, Athanasios |
author_facet | Pitiriga, Vassiliki Bakalis, John Theodoridou, Kalliopi Dimitroulia, Evangelia Saroglou, George Tsakris, Athanasios |
author_sort | Pitiriga, Vassiliki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), have been widely used as intravascular devices in critically ill patients. However, they might evoke complications, such as catheter colonization that has been considered as predisposing factor for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Although numerous studies have compared the risk of bloodstream infections between PICCs and CVCs, comparative studies on their colonization rates are limited. OBJECTIVES: The episodes of catheter colonization in critically ill patients with CVCs or PICCs were retrospectively analysed during a two-year period in a Greek tertiary care hospital and colonization rates, microbial profiles and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were compared. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data of consecutive hospitalized critically-ill patients who underwent PICC and CVC placement between May 2017–May 2019 were analysed. All catheters were examined by the semiquantitative culture technique for bacterial pathogens, either as a routine process after catheter removal or after suspicion of infection. Species identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns were determined by the Vitek2 automated system. RESULTS: During the survey period a total of 122/1187 (10.28%) catheter colonization cases were identified among CVCs and 19/639 (2.97%) cases among PICCs (p = 0.001). The colonization rate was 12.48/1000 catheter-days for the CVC group and 1.71/1000 catheter-days for the PICC group (p < 0.001). The colonization rate per 1000 catheter-days due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) was 3.85 in all study cases, 7.26 (71/122) in the CVC group and 0.63 (7/19) in the PICC group (p < 0.001). Within the CVC group, the most common microorganism isolated was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 38, 31.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 20, 16.4%). In the PICC group, the predominant microorganism isolated was Candida spp. (n = 5, 23.8%) followed by MDR K. pneumoniae and MDR A. baumannii in equal numbers (n = 3, 14.2%). CONCLUSION: PICC lines were associated with significantly lower colonization rates comparing to the CVC ones. In addition, patterns of microbial colonization revealed a trend over the predominance of MDR gram-negatives in CVCs suggesting that PICCs might be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient intravascular access. Prevention programs directed by local microbial ecology may diminish catheter colonization rates and CLABSIs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10405474 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104054742023-08-08 Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters Pitiriga, Vassiliki Bakalis, John Theodoridou, Kalliopi Dimitroulia, Evangelia Saroglou, George Tsakris, Athanasios Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), have been widely used as intravascular devices in critically ill patients. However, they might evoke complications, such as catheter colonization that has been considered as predisposing factor for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Although numerous studies have compared the risk of bloodstream infections between PICCs and CVCs, comparative studies on their colonization rates are limited. OBJECTIVES: The episodes of catheter colonization in critically ill patients with CVCs or PICCs were retrospectively analysed during a two-year period in a Greek tertiary care hospital and colonization rates, microbial profiles and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were compared. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data of consecutive hospitalized critically-ill patients who underwent PICC and CVC placement between May 2017–May 2019 were analysed. All catheters were examined by the semiquantitative culture technique for bacterial pathogens, either as a routine process after catheter removal or after suspicion of infection. Species identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns were determined by the Vitek2 automated system. RESULTS: During the survey period a total of 122/1187 (10.28%) catheter colonization cases were identified among CVCs and 19/639 (2.97%) cases among PICCs (p = 0.001). The colonization rate was 12.48/1000 catheter-days for the CVC group and 1.71/1000 catheter-days for the PICC group (p < 0.001). The colonization rate per 1000 catheter-days due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) was 3.85 in all study cases, 7.26 (71/122) in the CVC group and 0.63 (7/19) in the PICC group (p < 0.001). Within the CVC group, the most common microorganism isolated was MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 38, 31.1%) followed by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 20, 16.4%). In the PICC group, the predominant microorganism isolated was Candida spp. (n = 5, 23.8%) followed by MDR K. pneumoniae and MDR A. baumannii in equal numbers (n = 3, 14.2%). CONCLUSION: PICC lines were associated with significantly lower colonization rates comparing to the CVC ones. In addition, patterns of microbial colonization revealed a trend over the predominance of MDR gram-negatives in CVCs suggesting that PICCs might be a safer alternative for prolonged inpatient intravascular access. Prevention programs directed by local microbial ecology may diminish catheter colonization rates and CLABSIs. BioMed Central 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10405474/ /pubmed/37550791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01285-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pitiriga, Vassiliki Bakalis, John Theodoridou, Kalliopi Dimitroulia, Evangelia Saroglou, George Tsakris, Athanasios Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters |
title | Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters |
title_full | Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters |
title_fullStr | Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters |
title_short | Comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters |
title_sort | comparison of microbial colonization rates between central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37550791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01285-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pitirigavassiliki comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters AT bakalisjohn comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters AT theodoridoukalliopi comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters AT dimitrouliaevangelia comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters AT saroglougeorge comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters AT tsakrisathanasios comparisonofmicrobialcolonizationratesbetweencentralvenouscathetersandperipherallyinsertedcentralcatheters |