Cargando…
A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines
BACKGROUND: Research on human participants requires formal approval from a competent ethics committee. During the recruitment of the research participants, obtaining informed consent is a prerequisite. The online survey method is used by many researchers as it can collect the data from a diverse pop...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554239 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_175_22 |
_version_ | 1785085552636198912 |
---|---|
author | Mondal, Himel Mondal, Shaikat Soni, Sachin |
author_facet | Mondal, Himel Mondal, Shaikat Soni, Sachin |
author_sort | Mondal, Himel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research on human participants requires formal approval from a competent ethics committee. During the recruitment of the research participants, obtaining informed consent is a prerequisite. The online survey method is used by many researchers as it can collect the data from a diverse population in a short time. AIM: This study aimed to observe the characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines (set by the Indian Council of Medical Research [ICMR]) of informed consent coupled with online surveys. METHODS: We collected the informed consent text from online survey links obtained from a network of colleagues who got a request to participate in a survey. Data were collected from July 2020 to June 2022. The text was anonymized for further analysis. The word count, sentences, and Flesch reading ease score were calculated. The adherence to ICMR guidelines where checked by two authors individually and a consensus was reached to prepare the final result. RESULTS: A total of 44 online surveys in English were audited and among them, 10 did not have informed consent. The informed consent in 34 surveys had a median of 6 sentences and 84 words. The median reading ease score was 45.7 (college level). The majority of the consent states the purpose of the research (91.18%), the voluntary nature of the participation (85.29%), and mentioned that it is research (64.71%). However, the rest of the components are ignored by the majority of the survey consent form. CONCLUSION: Informed consent form with online surveys lacks adherence to the components suggested by ICMR. Hence, the forms should be made carefully by the researchers so that the vigor of informed consent is maintained in the online surveys. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10405532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104055322023-08-08 A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines Mondal, Himel Mondal, Shaikat Soni, Sachin Perspect Clin Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Research on human participants requires formal approval from a competent ethics committee. During the recruitment of the research participants, obtaining informed consent is a prerequisite. The online survey method is used by many researchers as it can collect the data from a diverse population in a short time. AIM: This study aimed to observe the characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines (set by the Indian Council of Medical Research [ICMR]) of informed consent coupled with online surveys. METHODS: We collected the informed consent text from online survey links obtained from a network of colleagues who got a request to participate in a survey. Data were collected from July 2020 to June 2022. The text was anonymized for further analysis. The word count, sentences, and Flesch reading ease score were calculated. The adherence to ICMR guidelines where checked by two authors individually and a consensus was reached to prepare the final result. RESULTS: A total of 44 online surveys in English were audited and among them, 10 did not have informed consent. The informed consent in 34 surveys had a median of 6 sentences and 84 words. The median reading ease score was 45.7 (college level). The majority of the consent states the purpose of the research (91.18%), the voluntary nature of the participation (85.29%), and mentioned that it is research (64.71%). However, the rest of the components are ignored by the majority of the survey consent form. CONCLUSION: Informed consent form with online surveys lacks adherence to the components suggested by ICMR. Hence, the forms should be made carefully by the researchers so that the vigor of informed consent is maintained in the online surveys. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10405532/ /pubmed/37554239 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_175_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Perspectives in Clinical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mondal, Himel Mondal, Shaikat Soni, Sachin A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title | A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title_full | A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title_fullStr | A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title_short | A cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: Characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
title_sort | cross-sectional audit of informed consent of online survey: characteristics and adherence to prevalent guidelines |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554239 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_175_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mondalhimel acrosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines AT mondalshaikat acrosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines AT sonisachin acrosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines AT mondalhimel crosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines AT mondalshaikat crosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines AT sonisachin crosssectionalauditofinformedconsentofonlinesurveycharacteristicsandadherencetoprevalentguidelines |