Cargando…
Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees
Cannabis is one of the world’s oldest cultivated plants and the most commonly used recreational drug worldwide. The plant relevant for medicinal use is Cannabis sativa that has two pharmacologically active ingredients – delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol that is psychoactive and cannabidiol that does not...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554245 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_159_22 |
_version_ | 1785085553897635840 |
---|---|
author | Nayak, Prakash Pantvaidya, Gouri Ranganathan, Priya Jiwnani, Sabita Joshi, Shalaka Gogtay, Nithya Jaideep |
author_facet | Nayak, Prakash Pantvaidya, Gouri Ranganathan, Priya Jiwnani, Sabita Joshi, Shalaka Gogtay, Nithya Jaideep |
author_sort | Nayak, Prakash |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cannabis is one of the world’s oldest cultivated plants and the most commonly used recreational drug worldwide. The plant relevant for medicinal use is Cannabis sativa that has two pharmacologically active ingredients – delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol that is psychoactive and cannabidiol that does not have psychotropic activity. The policy tapestry of Cannabis has undergone a significant change in the past few decades worldwide. Different countries have diverse policies, ranging from classifying use of Cannabis as illicit, to legalization of its use, both for medicinal and recreational purposes. Cannabis products are approved for use, for instance, in multiple sclerosis and Dravet syndrome (US Food Drug and Administration). Against this backdrop, we find that the knowledge foundations for use of Cannabis in clinical trials in India are still evolving. Conducting ethical research within a clinical trials framework is essential to understand dosing, formulation, shelf life, drug–drug interaction, tolerability, and safety before establishing its utility for various indications. In the absence of guidelines or a regulatory framework for conduct of these studies, the various Institutional Ethics Committees (IECs), which are responsible for reviewing projects related to Cannabis, face unique challenges with respect to the basic requirements. The principal investigators (PIs) are equally strained to find local guidance, recommendations, and literature in support of their application to the respective IEC, thus leading to an impasse and delay in initiating the proposed clinical studies with Cannabis. The present article addresses considerations, questions, and issues that affect the conduct of these clinical studies and recommends mandatory documents and some suggested guidelines for use by both PIs and IECs to take studies with Cannabis forward until such time that an interdisciplinary regulatory framework is firmed up by regulatory authority. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10405537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104055372023-08-08 Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees Nayak, Prakash Pantvaidya, Gouri Ranganathan, Priya Jiwnani, Sabita Joshi, Shalaka Gogtay, Nithya Jaideep Perspect Clin Res Ethics Education Cannabis is one of the world’s oldest cultivated plants and the most commonly used recreational drug worldwide. The plant relevant for medicinal use is Cannabis sativa that has two pharmacologically active ingredients – delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol that is psychoactive and cannabidiol that does not have psychotropic activity. The policy tapestry of Cannabis has undergone a significant change in the past few decades worldwide. Different countries have diverse policies, ranging from classifying use of Cannabis as illicit, to legalization of its use, both for medicinal and recreational purposes. Cannabis products are approved for use, for instance, in multiple sclerosis and Dravet syndrome (US Food Drug and Administration). Against this backdrop, we find that the knowledge foundations for use of Cannabis in clinical trials in India are still evolving. Conducting ethical research within a clinical trials framework is essential to understand dosing, formulation, shelf life, drug–drug interaction, tolerability, and safety before establishing its utility for various indications. In the absence of guidelines or a regulatory framework for conduct of these studies, the various Institutional Ethics Committees (IECs), which are responsible for reviewing projects related to Cannabis, face unique challenges with respect to the basic requirements. The principal investigators (PIs) are equally strained to find local guidance, recommendations, and literature in support of their application to the respective IEC, thus leading to an impasse and delay in initiating the proposed clinical studies with Cannabis. The present article addresses considerations, questions, and issues that affect the conduct of these clinical studies and recommends mandatory documents and some suggested guidelines for use by both PIs and IECs to take studies with Cannabis forward until such time that an interdisciplinary regulatory framework is firmed up by regulatory authority. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10405537/ /pubmed/37554245 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_159_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Perspectives in Clinical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Ethics Education Nayak, Prakash Pantvaidya, Gouri Ranganathan, Priya Jiwnani, Sabita Joshi, Shalaka Gogtay, Nithya Jaideep Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees |
title | Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees |
title_full | Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees |
title_fullStr | Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees |
title_short | Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees |
title_sort | clinical studies with cannabis in india – a need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees |
topic | Ethics Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554245 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_159_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nayakprakash clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees AT pantvaidyagouri clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees AT ranganathanpriya clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees AT jiwnanisabita clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees AT joshishalaka clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees AT gogtaynithyajaideep clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees |