Cargando…

Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees

Cannabis is one of the world’s oldest cultivated plants and the most commonly used recreational drug worldwide. The plant relevant for medicinal use is Cannabis sativa that has two pharmacologically active ingredients – delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol that is psychoactive and cannabidiol that does not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nayak, Prakash, Pantvaidya, Gouri, Ranganathan, Priya, Jiwnani, Sabita, Joshi, Shalaka, Gogtay, Nithya Jaideep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554245
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_159_22
_version_ 1785085553897635840
author Nayak, Prakash
Pantvaidya, Gouri
Ranganathan, Priya
Jiwnani, Sabita
Joshi, Shalaka
Gogtay, Nithya Jaideep
author_facet Nayak, Prakash
Pantvaidya, Gouri
Ranganathan, Priya
Jiwnani, Sabita
Joshi, Shalaka
Gogtay, Nithya Jaideep
author_sort Nayak, Prakash
collection PubMed
description Cannabis is one of the world’s oldest cultivated plants and the most commonly used recreational drug worldwide. The plant relevant for medicinal use is Cannabis sativa that has two pharmacologically active ingredients – delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol that is psychoactive and cannabidiol that does not have psychotropic activity. The policy tapestry of Cannabis has undergone a significant change in the past few decades worldwide. Different countries have diverse policies, ranging from classifying use of Cannabis as illicit, to legalization of its use, both for medicinal and recreational purposes. Cannabis products are approved for use, for instance, in multiple sclerosis and Dravet syndrome (US Food Drug and Administration). Against this backdrop, we find that the knowledge foundations for use of Cannabis in clinical trials in India are still evolving. Conducting ethical research within a clinical trials framework is essential to understand dosing, formulation, shelf life, drug–drug interaction, tolerability, and safety before establishing its utility for various indications. In the absence of guidelines or a regulatory framework for conduct of these studies, the various Institutional Ethics Committees (IECs), which are responsible for reviewing projects related to Cannabis, face unique challenges with respect to the basic requirements. The principal investigators (PIs) are equally strained to find local guidance, recommendations, and literature in support of their application to the respective IEC, thus leading to an impasse and delay in initiating the proposed clinical studies with Cannabis. The present article addresses considerations, questions, and issues that affect the conduct of these clinical studies and recommends mandatory documents and some suggested guidelines for use by both PIs and IECs to take studies with Cannabis forward until such time that an interdisciplinary regulatory framework is firmed up by regulatory authority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10405537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104055372023-08-08 Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees Nayak, Prakash Pantvaidya, Gouri Ranganathan, Priya Jiwnani, Sabita Joshi, Shalaka Gogtay, Nithya Jaideep Perspect Clin Res Ethics Education Cannabis is one of the world’s oldest cultivated plants and the most commonly used recreational drug worldwide. The plant relevant for medicinal use is Cannabis sativa that has two pharmacologically active ingredients – delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol that is psychoactive and cannabidiol that does not have psychotropic activity. The policy tapestry of Cannabis has undergone a significant change in the past few decades worldwide. Different countries have diverse policies, ranging from classifying use of Cannabis as illicit, to legalization of its use, both for medicinal and recreational purposes. Cannabis products are approved for use, for instance, in multiple sclerosis and Dravet syndrome (US Food Drug and Administration). Against this backdrop, we find that the knowledge foundations for use of Cannabis in clinical trials in India are still evolving. Conducting ethical research within a clinical trials framework is essential to understand dosing, formulation, shelf life, drug–drug interaction, tolerability, and safety before establishing its utility for various indications. In the absence of guidelines or a regulatory framework for conduct of these studies, the various Institutional Ethics Committees (IECs), which are responsible for reviewing projects related to Cannabis, face unique challenges with respect to the basic requirements. The principal investigators (PIs) are equally strained to find local guidance, recommendations, and literature in support of their application to the respective IEC, thus leading to an impasse and delay in initiating the proposed clinical studies with Cannabis. The present article addresses considerations, questions, and issues that affect the conduct of these clinical studies and recommends mandatory documents and some suggested guidelines for use by both PIs and IECs to take studies with Cannabis forward until such time that an interdisciplinary regulatory framework is firmed up by regulatory authority. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10405537/ /pubmed/37554245 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_159_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Perspectives in Clinical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Ethics Education
Nayak, Prakash
Pantvaidya, Gouri
Ranganathan, Priya
Jiwnani, Sabita
Joshi, Shalaka
Gogtay, Nithya Jaideep
Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees
title Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees
title_full Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees
title_fullStr Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees
title_full_unstemmed Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees
title_short Clinical studies with Cannabis in India – A need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees
title_sort clinical studies with cannabis in india – a need for guidelines for the investigators and ethics committees
topic Ethics Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554245
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_159_22
work_keys_str_mv AT nayakprakash clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees
AT pantvaidyagouri clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees
AT ranganathanpriya clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees
AT jiwnanisabita clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees
AT joshishalaka clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees
AT gogtaynithyajaideep clinicalstudieswithcannabisinindiaaneedforguidelinesfortheinvestigatorsandethicscommittees