Cargando…

The Functions of Safety in Psychotherapy: An Integrative Theoretical Perspective Across Therapeutic Schools

OBJECTIVE: There is a certain consensus in the psychotherapeutic literature that safety plays a central role in human development and psychotherapy and that lack of safety undermines mental health. However, the role of safety in psychotherapy has not yet been thoroughly examined. In this article, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Podolan, Martin, Gelo, Omar C. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554697
http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230304
_version_ 1785085583419244544
author Podolan, Martin
Gelo, Omar C. G.
author_facet Podolan, Martin
Gelo, Omar C. G.
author_sort Podolan, Martin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There is a certain consensus in the psychotherapeutic literature that safety plays a central role in human development and psychotherapy and that lack of safety undermines mental health. However, the role of safety in psychotherapy has not yet been thoroughly examined. In this article, we identify and integrate the diferent functions of safety in psychotherapy on a theoretical basis. METHOD: We made a panoramic overview of the concept of safety across some of the main psychotherapeutic schools that represent major paradigms in contemporary psychotherapy (psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, humanistic). We then analyzed, compared, and synthetized the findings to identify the common functions that safety plays both in ontogenesis and in clinical practice across different therapeutic orientations. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that safety is indeed rightly prioritized across psychotherapy schools because of its developmental value in promoting change and adaptation both in ontogenesis and clinical settings. The findings suggest that the main functions of safety are to secure survival, facilitate restoration, promote exploration, sustain risk-taking, and enable integration, with these functions being complementary and dependent on the context. However, safety seems to be in a dialectical and paradoxical relationship to psychotherapy and human development. Adequate ontogenetic development and treatment progress do not appear to require continuous maintenance of maximum possible safety. Rather, they seem to require enough safety, adequately and timely modulated according to developmental needs and treatment phases. CONCLUSIONS: Although safety provides the necessary basis that enables restoration, fuels exploration, and facilitates treatment progress, safety’s misdosage (e.g., lack, excess), misconstruction (e.g., misattunement, misinterpretation), or misuse (exploitation, idealization) may hinder the healthy development of attachment, identity, autonomy, self/co-regulation as well as the ability to tolerate and cope with dangers, risks, insecurities, or frustrations. Future research is suggested to further explore the role of safety in psychotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10405669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104056692023-08-08 The Functions of Safety in Psychotherapy: An Integrative Theoretical Perspective Across Therapeutic Schools Podolan, Martin Gelo, Omar C. G. Clin Neuropsychiatry Perspective Paper OBJECTIVE: There is a certain consensus in the psychotherapeutic literature that safety plays a central role in human development and psychotherapy and that lack of safety undermines mental health. However, the role of safety in psychotherapy has not yet been thoroughly examined. In this article, we identify and integrate the diferent functions of safety in psychotherapy on a theoretical basis. METHOD: We made a panoramic overview of the concept of safety across some of the main psychotherapeutic schools that represent major paradigms in contemporary psychotherapy (psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, humanistic). We then analyzed, compared, and synthetized the findings to identify the common functions that safety plays both in ontogenesis and in clinical practice across different therapeutic orientations. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that safety is indeed rightly prioritized across psychotherapy schools because of its developmental value in promoting change and adaptation both in ontogenesis and clinical settings. The findings suggest that the main functions of safety are to secure survival, facilitate restoration, promote exploration, sustain risk-taking, and enable integration, with these functions being complementary and dependent on the context. However, safety seems to be in a dialectical and paradoxical relationship to psychotherapy and human development. Adequate ontogenetic development and treatment progress do not appear to require continuous maintenance of maximum possible safety. Rather, they seem to require enough safety, adequately and timely modulated according to developmental needs and treatment phases. CONCLUSIONS: Although safety provides the necessary basis that enables restoration, fuels exploration, and facilitates treatment progress, safety’s misdosage (e.g., lack, excess), misconstruction (e.g., misattunement, misinterpretation), or misuse (exploitation, idealization) may hinder the healthy development of attachment, identity, autonomy, self/co-regulation as well as the ability to tolerate and cope with dangers, risks, insecurities, or frustrations. Future research is suggested to further explore the role of safety in psychotherapy. Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10405669/ /pubmed/37554697 http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230304 Text en © 2023 Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l. This is an open access article. Distribution and reproduction are permitted in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Perspective Paper
Podolan, Martin
Gelo, Omar C. G.
The Functions of Safety in Psychotherapy: An Integrative Theoretical Perspective Across Therapeutic Schools
title The Functions of Safety in Psychotherapy: An Integrative Theoretical Perspective Across Therapeutic Schools
title_full The Functions of Safety in Psychotherapy: An Integrative Theoretical Perspective Across Therapeutic Schools
title_fullStr The Functions of Safety in Psychotherapy: An Integrative Theoretical Perspective Across Therapeutic Schools
title_full_unstemmed The Functions of Safety in Psychotherapy: An Integrative Theoretical Perspective Across Therapeutic Schools
title_short The Functions of Safety in Psychotherapy: An Integrative Theoretical Perspective Across Therapeutic Schools
title_sort functions of safety in psychotherapy: an integrative theoretical perspective across therapeutic schools
topic Perspective Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554697
http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230304
work_keys_str_mv AT podolanmartin thefunctionsofsafetyinpsychotherapyanintegrativetheoreticalperspectiveacrosstherapeuticschools
AT geloomarcg thefunctionsofsafetyinpsychotherapyanintegrativetheoreticalperspectiveacrosstherapeuticschools
AT podolanmartin functionsofsafetyinpsychotherapyanintegrativetheoreticalperspectiveacrosstherapeuticschools
AT geloomarcg functionsofsafetyinpsychotherapyanintegrativetheoreticalperspectiveacrosstherapeuticschools