Cargando…

Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma

In transplant-eligible patients who undergo upfront autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM), standard practice is to treat with six to eight cycles of induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT. A gap between the end of induction and the day of ASCT exist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bao, Alicia, Zhao, Qiuhong, Kudalkar, Ruchi, Rodriguez, Jose, Sharma, Nidhi, Bumma, Naresh, Devarakonda, Srinivas S., Khan, Abdullah M., Umyarova, Elvira, Rosko, Ashley E., Benson, Don, Cottini, Francesca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1216461
_version_ 1785085617462312960
author Bao, Alicia
Zhao, Qiuhong
Kudalkar, Ruchi
Rodriguez, Jose
Sharma, Nidhi
Bumma, Naresh
Devarakonda, Srinivas S.
Khan, Abdullah M.
Umyarova, Elvira
Rosko, Ashley E.
Benson, Don
Cottini, Francesca
author_facet Bao, Alicia
Zhao, Qiuhong
Kudalkar, Ruchi
Rodriguez, Jose
Sharma, Nidhi
Bumma, Naresh
Devarakonda, Srinivas S.
Khan, Abdullah M.
Umyarova, Elvira
Rosko, Ashley E.
Benson, Don
Cottini, Francesca
author_sort Bao, Alicia
collection PubMed
description In transplant-eligible patients who undergo upfront autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM), standard practice is to treat with six to eight cycles of induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT. A gap between the end of induction and the day of ASCT exists to allow stem cell mobilization and collection. Despite attempts to limit the length of this interval, we noticed that some patients experience interval progression (IP) of disease between the end of induction therapy and the day of ASCT. We analyzed 408 MM patients who underwent ASCT between 2011 and 2016. The median length of the interval between end of induction and ASCT was 38 days. We observed that 26% of patients in the entire cohort and 23.6% of patients who received induction with bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRD) experienced IP. These patients deepened their responses with ASCT, independently of induction regimen. In the entire cohort, IP was significantly associated with shorter PFS in the univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio, HR = 1.37, P = 0.022) but not in the multivariable analysis (HR = 1.14, P = 0.44). However, analyzing only patients who received VRD as induction, progression-free survival (PFS) remained inferior in both the univariable (HR = 2.02; P = 0.002) and the multivariable analyses (HR = 1.96; P = 0.01). T cells and natural killer (NK) cells are increasingly studied targets of immunomodulatory therapy, as immune dysfunction is known to occur in patients with MM. Peripheral blood from 35 MM patients were analyzed. At time of ASCT, patients with IP had significantly increased percentages of CD3(+)CD8(+)CD57(+) CD28(-) (P = 0.05) and CD3(+)CD4(+)LAG3(+) (P = 0.0022) T-cells, as well as less CD56(bright) and CD56(dim) NK cells bearing activated markers such as CD69, NKG2D, and CD226. These data suggest that IP can impact the length of response to ASCT; therefore, further studies on the management of these patients are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10405820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104058202023-08-08 Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma Bao, Alicia Zhao, Qiuhong Kudalkar, Ruchi Rodriguez, Jose Sharma, Nidhi Bumma, Naresh Devarakonda, Srinivas S. Khan, Abdullah M. Umyarova, Elvira Rosko, Ashley E. Benson, Don Cottini, Francesca Front Oncol Oncology In transplant-eligible patients who undergo upfront autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM), standard practice is to treat with six to eight cycles of induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT. A gap between the end of induction and the day of ASCT exists to allow stem cell mobilization and collection. Despite attempts to limit the length of this interval, we noticed that some patients experience interval progression (IP) of disease between the end of induction therapy and the day of ASCT. We analyzed 408 MM patients who underwent ASCT between 2011 and 2016. The median length of the interval between end of induction and ASCT was 38 days. We observed that 26% of patients in the entire cohort and 23.6% of patients who received induction with bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRD) experienced IP. These patients deepened their responses with ASCT, independently of induction regimen. In the entire cohort, IP was significantly associated with shorter PFS in the univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio, HR = 1.37, P = 0.022) but not in the multivariable analysis (HR = 1.14, P = 0.44). However, analyzing only patients who received VRD as induction, progression-free survival (PFS) remained inferior in both the univariable (HR = 2.02; P = 0.002) and the multivariable analyses (HR = 1.96; P = 0.01). T cells and natural killer (NK) cells are increasingly studied targets of immunomodulatory therapy, as immune dysfunction is known to occur in patients with MM. Peripheral blood from 35 MM patients were analyzed. At time of ASCT, patients with IP had significantly increased percentages of CD3(+)CD8(+)CD57(+) CD28(-) (P = 0.05) and CD3(+)CD4(+)LAG3(+) (P = 0.0022) T-cells, as well as less CD56(bright) and CD56(dim) NK cells bearing activated markers such as CD69, NKG2D, and CD226. These data suggest that IP can impact the length of response to ASCT; therefore, further studies on the management of these patients are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10405820/ /pubmed/37554170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1216461 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bao, Zhao, Kudalkar, Rodriguez, Sharma, Bumma, Devarakonda, Khan, Umyarova, Rosko, Benson and Cottini https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Bao, Alicia
Zhao, Qiuhong
Kudalkar, Ruchi
Rodriguez, Jose
Sharma, Nidhi
Bumma, Naresh
Devarakonda, Srinivas S.
Khan, Abdullah M.
Umyarova, Elvira
Rosko, Ashley E.
Benson, Don
Cottini, Francesca
Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma
title Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma
title_full Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma
title_fullStr Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma
title_short Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma
title_sort impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554170
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1216461
work_keys_str_mv AT baoalicia impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT zhaoqiuhong impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT kudalkarruchi impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT rodriguezjose impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT sharmanidhi impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT bummanaresh impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT devarakondasrinivass impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT khanabdullahm impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT umyarovaelvira impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT roskoashleye impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT bensondon impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma
AT cottinifrancesca impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma