Cargando…
Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma
In transplant-eligible patients who undergo upfront autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM), standard practice is to treat with six to eight cycles of induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT. A gap between the end of induction and the day of ASCT exist...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1216461 |
_version_ | 1785085617462312960 |
---|---|
author | Bao, Alicia Zhao, Qiuhong Kudalkar, Ruchi Rodriguez, Jose Sharma, Nidhi Bumma, Naresh Devarakonda, Srinivas S. Khan, Abdullah M. Umyarova, Elvira Rosko, Ashley E. Benson, Don Cottini, Francesca |
author_facet | Bao, Alicia Zhao, Qiuhong Kudalkar, Ruchi Rodriguez, Jose Sharma, Nidhi Bumma, Naresh Devarakonda, Srinivas S. Khan, Abdullah M. Umyarova, Elvira Rosko, Ashley E. Benson, Don Cottini, Francesca |
author_sort | Bao, Alicia |
collection | PubMed |
description | In transplant-eligible patients who undergo upfront autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM), standard practice is to treat with six to eight cycles of induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT. A gap between the end of induction and the day of ASCT exists to allow stem cell mobilization and collection. Despite attempts to limit the length of this interval, we noticed that some patients experience interval progression (IP) of disease between the end of induction therapy and the day of ASCT. We analyzed 408 MM patients who underwent ASCT between 2011 and 2016. The median length of the interval between end of induction and ASCT was 38 days. We observed that 26% of patients in the entire cohort and 23.6% of patients who received induction with bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRD) experienced IP. These patients deepened their responses with ASCT, independently of induction regimen. In the entire cohort, IP was significantly associated with shorter PFS in the univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio, HR = 1.37, P = 0.022) but not in the multivariable analysis (HR = 1.14, P = 0.44). However, analyzing only patients who received VRD as induction, progression-free survival (PFS) remained inferior in both the univariable (HR = 2.02; P = 0.002) and the multivariable analyses (HR = 1.96; P = 0.01). T cells and natural killer (NK) cells are increasingly studied targets of immunomodulatory therapy, as immune dysfunction is known to occur in patients with MM. Peripheral blood from 35 MM patients were analyzed. At time of ASCT, patients with IP had significantly increased percentages of CD3(+)CD8(+)CD57(+) CD28(-) (P = 0.05) and CD3(+)CD4(+)LAG3(+) (P = 0.0022) T-cells, as well as less CD56(bright) and CD56(dim) NK cells bearing activated markers such as CD69, NKG2D, and CD226. These data suggest that IP can impact the length of response to ASCT; therefore, further studies on the management of these patients are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10405820 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104058202023-08-08 Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma Bao, Alicia Zhao, Qiuhong Kudalkar, Ruchi Rodriguez, Jose Sharma, Nidhi Bumma, Naresh Devarakonda, Srinivas S. Khan, Abdullah M. Umyarova, Elvira Rosko, Ashley E. Benson, Don Cottini, Francesca Front Oncol Oncology In transplant-eligible patients who undergo upfront autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM), standard practice is to treat with six to eight cycles of induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with ASCT. A gap between the end of induction and the day of ASCT exists to allow stem cell mobilization and collection. Despite attempts to limit the length of this interval, we noticed that some patients experience interval progression (IP) of disease between the end of induction therapy and the day of ASCT. We analyzed 408 MM patients who underwent ASCT between 2011 and 2016. The median length of the interval between end of induction and ASCT was 38 days. We observed that 26% of patients in the entire cohort and 23.6% of patients who received induction with bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRD) experienced IP. These patients deepened their responses with ASCT, independently of induction regimen. In the entire cohort, IP was significantly associated with shorter PFS in the univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio, HR = 1.37, P = 0.022) but not in the multivariable analysis (HR = 1.14, P = 0.44). However, analyzing only patients who received VRD as induction, progression-free survival (PFS) remained inferior in both the univariable (HR = 2.02; P = 0.002) and the multivariable analyses (HR = 1.96; P = 0.01). T cells and natural killer (NK) cells are increasingly studied targets of immunomodulatory therapy, as immune dysfunction is known to occur in patients with MM. Peripheral blood from 35 MM patients were analyzed. At time of ASCT, patients with IP had significantly increased percentages of CD3(+)CD8(+)CD57(+) CD28(-) (P = 0.05) and CD3(+)CD4(+)LAG3(+) (P = 0.0022) T-cells, as well as less CD56(bright) and CD56(dim) NK cells bearing activated markers such as CD69, NKG2D, and CD226. These data suggest that IP can impact the length of response to ASCT; therefore, further studies on the management of these patients are needed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10405820/ /pubmed/37554170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1216461 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bao, Zhao, Kudalkar, Rodriguez, Sharma, Bumma, Devarakonda, Khan, Umyarova, Rosko, Benson and Cottini https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Bao, Alicia Zhao, Qiuhong Kudalkar, Ruchi Rodriguez, Jose Sharma, Nidhi Bumma, Naresh Devarakonda, Srinivas S. Khan, Abdullah M. Umyarova, Elvira Rosko, Ashley E. Benson, Don Cottini, Francesca Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma |
title | Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma |
title_full | Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma |
title_fullStr | Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma |
title_short | Impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma |
title_sort | impact of interval progression before autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405820/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554170 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1216461 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baoalicia impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT zhaoqiuhong impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT kudalkarruchi impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT rodriguezjose impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT sharmanidhi impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT bummanaresh impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT devarakondasrinivass impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT khanabdullahm impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT umyarovaelvira impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT roskoashleye impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT bensondon impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma AT cottinifrancesca impactofintervalprogressionbeforeautologousstemcelltransplantinpatientswithmultiplemyeloma |