Cargando…

Factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic results in oncoplastic surgery

INTRODUCTION: Oncoplastic surgery (OS) has expanded the indications for breast-conserving surgery associated with an adequate aesthetic result. However, few studies have described the factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes from this surgical modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira-Junior, Idam, da Costa Vieira, René Aloísio, Biller, Gabriele, Sarri, Almir José, da Silva, Fabíola Cristina Brandini, Nahás, Eliana Aguiar Petri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554162
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1071127
_version_ 1785085640767963136
author de Oliveira-Junior, Idam
da Costa Vieira, René Aloísio
Biller, Gabriele
Sarri, Almir José
da Silva, Fabíola Cristina Brandini
Nahás, Eliana Aguiar Petri
author_facet de Oliveira-Junior, Idam
da Costa Vieira, René Aloísio
Biller, Gabriele
Sarri, Almir José
da Silva, Fabíola Cristina Brandini
Nahás, Eliana Aguiar Petri
author_sort de Oliveira-Junior, Idam
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Oncoplastic surgery (OS) has expanded the indications for breast-conserving surgery associated with an adequate aesthetic result. However, few studies have described the factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes from this surgical modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional prospective study that included patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without OS. The patients self-evaluated the cosmetic results of the breasts posttreatment and had them photographed. The photos were analyzed by BCCT.core. Individual and treatment factors (local and systemic) for all patients were evaluated. These factors were dichotomized according to the use of OS and to the cosmetic result (satisfactory and unsatisfactory). Categorical variables were tested for association with surgical outcome using the chi-square test while numerical variables using the Mann−Whitney U test. Variables with p <0,2 were selected for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients evaluated, 72 (24,0%) underwent OS. According to the patient self-evaluations, an unsatisfactory cosmetic result from OS was significantly associated with younger age at diagnosis, higher body mass index (BMI) at the time of evaluation, larger tumor size and greater weight of the surgical specimen. According to the BCCT.core, only the laterality of the tumor (left) was significantly associated with an unsatisfactory cosmetic result. In logistic regression, considering OS as a control variable, the risk of an unsatisfactory outcome according to patient self-evaluation was related to the tumor ≥ T2 odds ratio (OR) 1,85 (1,027-3,34) and age at diagnosis < 40 [OR 5,0 (1,84-13,95)]. However, according to the software, the variables were associated with an increased risk of an unsatisfactory outcome were the time interval between surgery and evaluation [OR 1,27 (1,16-1,39)], the presence of lymphedema [OR 2,97 (1,36-6,46)], surgical wound infection [OR 3,6 (1,22-11,16)], tumor location on the left side [OR 3,06 (1,69-5,53)], overweight [OR 2,93 (1,48-5,8)] and obesity [OR 2,52 (1,2-5,31)]. CONCLUSION: There is no standard methodology for breast cosmesis evaluation, which influences the factors associated with unsatisfactory results. Younger patients and those with increased BMI, left breast cancer and extensive resections tend to present with unsatisfactory cosmetic results when OS is performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10405917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104059172023-08-08 Factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic results in oncoplastic surgery de Oliveira-Junior, Idam da Costa Vieira, René Aloísio Biller, Gabriele Sarri, Almir José da Silva, Fabíola Cristina Brandini Nahás, Eliana Aguiar Petri Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Oncoplastic surgery (OS) has expanded the indications for breast-conserving surgery associated with an adequate aesthetic result. However, few studies have described the factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes from this surgical modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional prospective study that included patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with or without OS. The patients self-evaluated the cosmetic results of the breasts posttreatment and had them photographed. The photos were analyzed by BCCT.core. Individual and treatment factors (local and systemic) for all patients were evaluated. These factors were dichotomized according to the use of OS and to the cosmetic result (satisfactory and unsatisfactory). Categorical variables were tested for association with surgical outcome using the chi-square test while numerical variables using the Mann−Whitney U test. Variables with p <0,2 were selected for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients evaluated, 72 (24,0%) underwent OS. According to the patient self-evaluations, an unsatisfactory cosmetic result from OS was significantly associated with younger age at diagnosis, higher body mass index (BMI) at the time of evaluation, larger tumor size and greater weight of the surgical specimen. According to the BCCT.core, only the laterality of the tumor (left) was significantly associated with an unsatisfactory cosmetic result. In logistic regression, considering OS as a control variable, the risk of an unsatisfactory outcome according to patient self-evaluation was related to the tumor ≥ T2 odds ratio (OR) 1,85 (1,027-3,34) and age at diagnosis < 40 [OR 5,0 (1,84-13,95)]. However, according to the software, the variables were associated with an increased risk of an unsatisfactory outcome were the time interval between surgery and evaluation [OR 1,27 (1,16-1,39)], the presence of lymphedema [OR 2,97 (1,36-6,46)], surgical wound infection [OR 3,6 (1,22-11,16)], tumor location on the left side [OR 3,06 (1,69-5,53)], overweight [OR 2,93 (1,48-5,8)] and obesity [OR 2,52 (1,2-5,31)]. CONCLUSION: There is no standard methodology for breast cosmesis evaluation, which influences the factors associated with unsatisfactory results. Younger patients and those with increased BMI, left breast cancer and extensive resections tend to present with unsatisfactory cosmetic results when OS is performed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10405917/ /pubmed/37554162 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1071127 Text en Copyright © 2023 de Oliveira-Junior, da Costa Vieira, Biller, Sarri, da Silva and Nahás https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
de Oliveira-Junior, Idam
da Costa Vieira, René Aloísio
Biller, Gabriele
Sarri, Almir José
da Silva, Fabíola Cristina Brandini
Nahás, Eliana Aguiar Petri
Factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic results in oncoplastic surgery
title Factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic results in oncoplastic surgery
title_full Factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic results in oncoplastic surgery
title_fullStr Factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic results in oncoplastic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic results in oncoplastic surgery
title_short Factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic results in oncoplastic surgery
title_sort factors associated with unsatisfactory cosmetic results in oncoplastic surgery
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554162
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1071127
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveirajunioridam factorsassociatedwithunsatisfactorycosmeticresultsinoncoplasticsurgery
AT dacostavieirarenealoisio factorsassociatedwithunsatisfactorycosmeticresultsinoncoplasticsurgery
AT billergabriele factorsassociatedwithunsatisfactorycosmeticresultsinoncoplasticsurgery
AT sarrialmirjose factorsassociatedwithunsatisfactorycosmeticresultsinoncoplasticsurgery
AT dasilvafabiolacristinabrandini factorsassociatedwithunsatisfactorycosmeticresultsinoncoplasticsurgery
AT nahaselianaaguiarpetri factorsassociatedwithunsatisfactorycosmeticresultsinoncoplasticsurgery