Cargando…

Augmented reality-based training versus standard training in improvement of balance, mobility and fall risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Augmented reality (AR) technology is being used recently in healthcare, especially for rehabilitation purposes, owing to its ability for repetition, rapid feedback, and motivation for patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of AR-based interventions to convent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lamichhane, Pratik, Sukralia, Shreya, Alam, Benish, Shaikh, Shawn, Farrukh, Shireen, Ali, Shahid, Ojha, Rajeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000986
_version_ 1785085664206782464
author Lamichhane, Pratik
Sukralia, Shreya
Alam, Benish
Shaikh, Shawn
Farrukh, Shireen
Ali, Shahid
Ojha, Rajeev
author_facet Lamichhane, Pratik
Sukralia, Shreya
Alam, Benish
Shaikh, Shawn
Farrukh, Shireen
Ali, Shahid
Ojha, Rajeev
author_sort Lamichhane, Pratik
collection PubMed
description Augmented reality (AR) technology is being used recently in healthcare, especially for rehabilitation purposes, owing to its ability for repetition, rapid feedback, and motivation for patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of AR-based interventions to conventional physical interventions in improving balance, mobility, and fall risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from inception to January 2023. Randomized trials and observational cohort studies comparing the effects of AR-based exercises with conventional training in patients 18 years and older were included in the analysis. Studies using virtual reality, case reports and series, reviews, meta-analyses, letters, and editorials were excluded. Post-intervention data on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test were extracted and studied. The fixed-effects inverse variance model was utilized to pool the extracted data. RESULTS: Out of 438 articles, seven articles (199 participants) comparing AR-based exercise with the standard training were included in the systematic review. Six articles with sufficient data on the parameters were included in the meta-analysis. AR-based exercises resulted in a significantly higher BBS score than conventional exercise (Hedge’s g=0.48, 95% CI=0.19–0.77, P<0.001). The BBS value was significantly higher in AR-based training of 8 weeks or more (Hedge’s g=0.88, 95% CI=0.46–1.31) when compared with trainings conducted for less than 8 weeks (Hedge’s g=0.11, 95% CI=−0.30 to 0.52), P=0.01). Likewise, the TUG Test score was found to be to be significantly lower in ARgroup than the controls (Hedge’s g= −0.54, 95% CI=−0.85 to −0.23, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: In comparison to conventional methods, AR-based exercises had higher improvements in balance, mobility, and fall risk parameters. The use of AR technology in elderly patients can promote independence while preventing falls and associated morbidity and mortality. There is a need for a larger randomized controlled trial to provide a more accurate comparison on efficacy and safety of different modalities of training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10406051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104060512023-08-08 Augmented reality-based training versus standard training in improvement of balance, mobility and fall risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lamichhane, Pratik Sukralia, Shreya Alam, Benish Shaikh, Shawn Farrukh, Shireen Ali, Shahid Ojha, Rajeev Ann Med Surg (Lond) Review Articles Augmented reality (AR) technology is being used recently in healthcare, especially for rehabilitation purposes, owing to its ability for repetition, rapid feedback, and motivation for patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of AR-based interventions to conventional physical interventions in improving balance, mobility, and fall risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from inception to January 2023. Randomized trials and observational cohort studies comparing the effects of AR-based exercises with conventional training in patients 18 years and older were included in the analysis. Studies using virtual reality, case reports and series, reviews, meta-analyses, letters, and editorials were excluded. Post-intervention data on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test were extracted and studied. The fixed-effects inverse variance model was utilized to pool the extracted data. RESULTS: Out of 438 articles, seven articles (199 participants) comparing AR-based exercise with the standard training were included in the systematic review. Six articles with sufficient data on the parameters were included in the meta-analysis. AR-based exercises resulted in a significantly higher BBS score than conventional exercise (Hedge’s g=0.48, 95% CI=0.19–0.77, P<0.001). The BBS value was significantly higher in AR-based training of 8 weeks or more (Hedge’s g=0.88, 95% CI=0.46–1.31) when compared with trainings conducted for less than 8 weeks (Hedge’s g=0.11, 95% CI=−0.30 to 0.52), P=0.01). Likewise, the TUG Test score was found to be to be significantly lower in ARgroup than the controls (Hedge’s g= −0.54, 95% CI=−0.85 to −0.23, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: In comparison to conventional methods, AR-based exercises had higher improvements in balance, mobility, and fall risk parameters. The use of AR technology in elderly patients can promote independence while preventing falls and associated morbidity and mortality. There is a need for a larger randomized controlled trial to provide a more accurate comparison on efficacy and safety of different modalities of training. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10406051/ /pubmed/37554880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000986 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review Articles
Lamichhane, Pratik
Sukralia, Shreya
Alam, Benish
Shaikh, Shawn
Farrukh, Shireen
Ali, Shahid
Ojha, Rajeev
Augmented reality-based training versus standard training in improvement of balance, mobility and fall risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Augmented reality-based training versus standard training in improvement of balance, mobility and fall risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Augmented reality-based training versus standard training in improvement of balance, mobility and fall risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Augmented reality-based training versus standard training in improvement of balance, mobility and fall risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Augmented reality-based training versus standard training in improvement of balance, mobility and fall risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Augmented reality-based training versus standard training in improvement of balance, mobility and fall risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort augmented reality-based training versus standard training in improvement of balance, mobility and fall risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000986
work_keys_str_mv AT lamichhanepratik augmentedrealitybasedtrainingversusstandardtraininginimprovementofbalancemobilityandfallriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sukraliashreya augmentedrealitybasedtrainingversusstandardtraininginimprovementofbalancemobilityandfallriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alambenish augmentedrealitybasedtrainingversusstandardtraininginimprovementofbalancemobilityandfallriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shaikhshawn augmentedrealitybasedtrainingversusstandardtraininginimprovementofbalancemobilityandfallriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT farrukhshireen augmentedrealitybasedtrainingversusstandardtraininginimprovementofbalancemobilityandfallriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alishahid augmentedrealitybasedtrainingversusstandardtraininginimprovementofbalancemobilityandfallriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ojharajeev augmentedrealitybasedtrainingversusstandardtraininginimprovementofbalancemobilityandfallriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis