Cargando…

Efficacy of Technical Modifications to the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To compare the outcomes of modified-Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) techniques with those of conventional-ALPPS. BACKGROUND: ALPPS is an established technique for treating advanced liver tumors. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khajeh, Elias, Ramouz, Ali, Dooghaie Moghadam, Arash, Aminizadeh, Ehsan, Ghamarnejad, Omid, Ali-Hassan-Al-Saegh, Sadeq, Hammad, Ahmed, Shafiei, Saeed, Abbasi Dezfouli, Sepehr, Nickkholgh, Arash, Golriz, Mohammad, Goncalves, Gil, Rio-Tinto, Ricardo, Carvalho, Carlos, Hoffmann, Katrin, Probst, Pascal, Mehrabi, Arianeb
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000221
_version_ 1785085676887212032
author Khajeh, Elias
Ramouz, Ali
Dooghaie Moghadam, Arash
Aminizadeh, Ehsan
Ghamarnejad, Omid
Ali-Hassan-Al-Saegh, Sadeq
Hammad, Ahmed
Shafiei, Saeed
Abbasi Dezfouli, Sepehr
Nickkholgh, Arash
Golriz, Mohammad
Goncalves, Gil
Rio-Tinto, Ricardo
Carvalho, Carlos
Hoffmann, Katrin
Probst, Pascal
Mehrabi, Arianeb
author_facet Khajeh, Elias
Ramouz, Ali
Dooghaie Moghadam, Arash
Aminizadeh, Ehsan
Ghamarnejad, Omid
Ali-Hassan-Al-Saegh, Sadeq
Hammad, Ahmed
Shafiei, Saeed
Abbasi Dezfouli, Sepehr
Nickkholgh, Arash
Golriz, Mohammad
Goncalves, Gil
Rio-Tinto, Ricardo
Carvalho, Carlos
Hoffmann, Katrin
Probst, Pascal
Mehrabi, Arianeb
author_sort Khajeh, Elias
collection PubMed
description To compare the outcomes of modified-Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) techniques with those of conventional-ALPPS. BACKGROUND: ALPPS is an established technique for treating advanced liver tumors. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched. The outcomes were assessed by single-arm and 2-arm analyses. RESULTS: Seventeen studies containing 335 modified-ALPPS patients were included in single-arm meta-analysis. The estimated blood loss was 267 ± 29 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 210–324 mL) during the first and 662 ± 51 mL (95% CI, 562–762 mL) during the second stage. The operation time was 166 ± 18 minutes (95% CI, 131–202 minutes) during the first and 225 ± 19 minutes (95% CI, 188–263 minutes) during the second stage. The major morbidity rate was 14% (95% CI, 9%–22%) after the first stage. The future liver remnant hypertrophy rate was 65.2% ± 5% (95% CI, 55%–75%) and the interstage interval was 16 ± 1 days (95% CI, 14–17 days). The dropout rate was 9% (95% CI, 5%–15%). The overall complication rate was 46% (95% CI, 37%–56%) and the major complication rate was 20% (95% CI, 14%–26%). The postoperative mortality rate was 7% (95% CI, 4%–11%). Seven studies containing 215 patients were included in comparative analysis. The hypertrophy rate was not different between 2 methods (mean difference [MD], –5.01; 95% CI, –19.16 to 9.14; P = 0.49). The interstage interval was shorter for partial-ALPPS (MD, 9.43; 95% CI, 3.29–15.58; P = 0.003). The overall complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 10.10; 95% CI, 2.11–48.35; P = 0.004) and mortality rate (OR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.36–10.26; P = 0.01) were higher in the conventional-ALPPS. CONCLUSIONS: The hypertrophy rate in partial-ALPPS was similar to conventional-ALPPS. This shows that minimizing the first stage of the operation does not affect hypertrophy. Moreover, the postoperative overall morbidity and mortality rates were lower following partial-ALPPS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10406102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104061022023-08-18 Efficacy of Technical Modifications to the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Khajeh, Elias Ramouz, Ali Dooghaie Moghadam, Arash Aminizadeh, Ehsan Ghamarnejad, Omid Ali-Hassan-Al-Saegh, Sadeq Hammad, Ahmed Shafiei, Saeed Abbasi Dezfouli, Sepehr Nickkholgh, Arash Golriz, Mohammad Goncalves, Gil Rio-Tinto, Ricardo Carvalho, Carlos Hoffmann, Katrin Probst, Pascal Mehrabi, Arianeb Ann Surg Open Meta-Analysis To compare the outcomes of modified-Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) techniques with those of conventional-ALPPS. BACKGROUND: ALPPS is an established technique for treating advanced liver tumors. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched. The outcomes were assessed by single-arm and 2-arm analyses. RESULTS: Seventeen studies containing 335 modified-ALPPS patients were included in single-arm meta-analysis. The estimated blood loss was 267 ± 29 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 210–324 mL) during the first and 662 ± 51 mL (95% CI, 562–762 mL) during the second stage. The operation time was 166 ± 18 minutes (95% CI, 131–202 minutes) during the first and 225 ± 19 minutes (95% CI, 188–263 minutes) during the second stage. The major morbidity rate was 14% (95% CI, 9%–22%) after the first stage. The future liver remnant hypertrophy rate was 65.2% ± 5% (95% CI, 55%–75%) and the interstage interval was 16 ± 1 days (95% CI, 14–17 days). The dropout rate was 9% (95% CI, 5%–15%). The overall complication rate was 46% (95% CI, 37%–56%) and the major complication rate was 20% (95% CI, 14%–26%). The postoperative mortality rate was 7% (95% CI, 4%–11%). Seven studies containing 215 patients were included in comparative analysis. The hypertrophy rate was not different between 2 methods (mean difference [MD], –5.01; 95% CI, –19.16 to 9.14; P = 0.49). The interstage interval was shorter for partial-ALPPS (MD, 9.43; 95% CI, 3.29–15.58; P = 0.003). The overall complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 10.10; 95% CI, 2.11–48.35; P = 0.004) and mortality rate (OR, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.36–10.26; P = 0.01) were higher in the conventional-ALPPS. CONCLUSIONS: The hypertrophy rate in partial-ALPPS was similar to conventional-ALPPS. This shows that minimizing the first stage of the operation does not affect hypertrophy. Moreover, the postoperative overall morbidity and mortality rates were lower following partial-ALPPS. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2022-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10406102/ /pubmed/37600287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000221 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Khajeh, Elias
Ramouz, Ali
Dooghaie Moghadam, Arash
Aminizadeh, Ehsan
Ghamarnejad, Omid
Ali-Hassan-Al-Saegh, Sadeq
Hammad, Ahmed
Shafiei, Saeed
Abbasi Dezfouli, Sepehr
Nickkholgh, Arash
Golriz, Mohammad
Goncalves, Gil
Rio-Tinto, Ricardo
Carvalho, Carlos
Hoffmann, Katrin
Probst, Pascal
Mehrabi, Arianeb
Efficacy of Technical Modifications to the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy of Technical Modifications to the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy of Technical Modifications to the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of Technical Modifications to the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Technical Modifications to the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy of Technical Modifications to the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy of technical modifications to the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (alpps) procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37600287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000221
work_keys_str_mv AT khajehelias efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ramouzali efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dooghaiemoghadamarash efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT aminizadehehsan efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ghamarnejadomid efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alihassanalsaeghsadeq efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hammadahmed efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shafieisaeed efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abbasidezfoulisepehr efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nickkholgharash efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT golrizmohammad efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT goncalvesgil efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT riotintoricardo efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carvalhocarlos efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hoffmannkatrin efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT probstpascal efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mehrabiarianeb efficacyoftechnicalmodificationstotheassociatingliverpartitionandportalveinligationforstagedhepatectomyalppsprocedureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis