Cargando…

Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing

PURPOSE: To investigate the HER2 status and clinicopathological features in invasive breast cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0, which has always been controversial. METHODS: Forty breast cancer cases with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected and classified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Qianming, Lv, Hong, Bao, Longlong, Yang, Yu, Zhang, Xin, Chang, Heng, Xue, Tian, Ren, Min, Zhu, Xiaoli, Zhou, Xiaoyan, Yang, Wentao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554155
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S420738
_version_ 1785085678835466240
author Bai, Qianming
Lv, Hong
Bao, Longlong
Yang, Yu
Zhang, Xin
Chang, Heng
Xue, Tian
Ren, Min
Zhu, Xiaoli
Zhou, Xiaoyan
Yang, Wentao
author_facet Bai, Qianming
Lv, Hong
Bao, Longlong
Yang, Yu
Zhang, Xin
Chang, Heng
Xue, Tian
Ren, Min
Zhu, Xiaoli
Zhou, Xiaoyan
Yang, Wentao
author_sort Bai, Qianming
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the HER2 status and clinicopathological features in invasive breast cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0, which has always been controversial. METHODS: Forty breast cancer cases with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected and classified into two groups based on the HRE2/CEP17 ratio (Group A: ≥2.0, n=22; Group B: <2.0, n=18). Clinicopathological characteristics, HER2 status, risk classification, and molecular typing were further analyzed and compared by 21-Gene expression assay and MammaPrint plus BluePrint test. RESULTS: The majority of cases in both groups were invasive carcinoma (NOS), with histological grade II, HR+, Ki-67 ≥20%, HER2 2+, and a high risk of recurrence, although younger patients and lymph node metastases were more common in Group A. Surprisingly, all HR+ breast cancers in both groups were classified as luminal-type, HR− cases were all basal-type or unknown, and the index of HER2 in all cases was <0.000 using the BluePrint test, which indicated that HER2 status should be negative. Furthermore, the level of HER2 mRNA expression in all cases of both groups was <10.7, which was defined as HER2 negative by the 21-Gene expression assay. In addition, 10 patients of Group A received anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy; only one patient with HR- achieved Grade 5 based on the Miller-Payne system, whereas none of the patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) based on the Residual Cancer Burden system. CONCLUSION: Group A breast cancer, which has always been unquestionably diagnosed as HER2 amplification, was more likely to be HER2 negative and derived less benefit from anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Group A breast cancer should be distinguished from classical HER2-positive breast cancers when assessing HER2 FISH, and a larger cohort of Group A patients should be included in further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10406110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104061102023-08-08 Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing Bai, Qianming Lv, Hong Bao, Longlong Yang, Yu Zhang, Xin Chang, Heng Xue, Tian Ren, Min Zhu, Xiaoli Zhou, Xiaoyan Yang, Wentao Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Original Research PURPOSE: To investigate the HER2 status and clinicopathological features in invasive breast cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0, which has always been controversial. METHODS: Forty breast cancer cases with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected and classified into two groups based on the HRE2/CEP17 ratio (Group A: ≥2.0, n=22; Group B: <2.0, n=18). Clinicopathological characteristics, HER2 status, risk classification, and molecular typing were further analyzed and compared by 21-Gene expression assay and MammaPrint plus BluePrint test. RESULTS: The majority of cases in both groups were invasive carcinoma (NOS), with histological grade II, HR+, Ki-67 ≥20%, HER2 2+, and a high risk of recurrence, although younger patients and lymph node metastases were more common in Group A. Surprisingly, all HR+ breast cancers in both groups were classified as luminal-type, HR− cases were all basal-type or unknown, and the index of HER2 in all cases was <0.000 using the BluePrint test, which indicated that HER2 status should be negative. Furthermore, the level of HER2 mRNA expression in all cases of both groups was <10.7, which was defined as HER2 negative by the 21-Gene expression assay. In addition, 10 patients of Group A received anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy; only one patient with HR- achieved Grade 5 based on the Miller-Payne system, whereas none of the patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) based on the Residual Cancer Burden system. CONCLUSION: Group A breast cancer, which has always been unquestionably diagnosed as HER2 amplification, was more likely to be HER2 negative and derived less benefit from anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Group A breast cancer should be distinguished from classical HER2-positive breast cancers when assessing HER2 FISH, and a larger cohort of Group A patients should be included in further studies. Dove 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10406110/ /pubmed/37554155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S420738 Text en © 2023 Bai et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bai, Qianming
Lv, Hong
Bao, Longlong
Yang, Yu
Zhang, Xin
Chang, Heng
Xue, Tian
Ren, Min
Zhu, Xiaoli
Zhou, Xiaoyan
Yang, Wentao
Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing
title Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing
title_full Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing
title_fullStr Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing
title_full_unstemmed Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing
title_short Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing
title_sort invasive breast cancer with her2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: risk classification and molecular typing by a 21-gene expression assay and mammaprint plus blueprint testing
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554155
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S420738
work_keys_str_mv AT baiqianming invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting
AT lvhong invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting
AT baolonglong invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting
AT yangyu invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting
AT zhangxin invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting
AT changheng invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting
AT xuetian invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting
AT renmin invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting
AT zhuxiaoli invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting
AT zhouxiaoyan invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting
AT yangwentao invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting