Cargando…
Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing
PURPOSE: To investigate the HER2 status and clinicopathological features in invasive breast cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0, which has always been controversial. METHODS: Forty breast cancer cases with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected and classified...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S420738 |
_version_ | 1785085678835466240 |
---|---|
author | Bai, Qianming Lv, Hong Bao, Longlong Yang, Yu Zhang, Xin Chang, Heng Xue, Tian Ren, Min Zhu, Xiaoli Zhou, Xiaoyan Yang, Wentao |
author_facet | Bai, Qianming Lv, Hong Bao, Longlong Yang, Yu Zhang, Xin Chang, Heng Xue, Tian Ren, Min Zhu, Xiaoli Zhou, Xiaoyan Yang, Wentao |
author_sort | Bai, Qianming |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate the HER2 status and clinicopathological features in invasive breast cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0, which has always been controversial. METHODS: Forty breast cancer cases with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected and classified into two groups based on the HRE2/CEP17 ratio (Group A: ≥2.0, n=22; Group B: <2.0, n=18). Clinicopathological characteristics, HER2 status, risk classification, and molecular typing were further analyzed and compared by 21-Gene expression assay and MammaPrint plus BluePrint test. RESULTS: The majority of cases in both groups were invasive carcinoma (NOS), with histological grade II, HR+, Ki-67 ≥20%, HER2 2+, and a high risk of recurrence, although younger patients and lymph node metastases were more common in Group A. Surprisingly, all HR+ breast cancers in both groups were classified as luminal-type, HR− cases were all basal-type or unknown, and the index of HER2 in all cases was <0.000 using the BluePrint test, which indicated that HER2 status should be negative. Furthermore, the level of HER2 mRNA expression in all cases of both groups was <10.7, which was defined as HER2 negative by the 21-Gene expression assay. In addition, 10 patients of Group A received anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy; only one patient with HR- achieved Grade 5 based on the Miller-Payne system, whereas none of the patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) based on the Residual Cancer Burden system. CONCLUSION: Group A breast cancer, which has always been unquestionably diagnosed as HER2 amplification, was more likely to be HER2 negative and derived less benefit from anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Group A breast cancer should be distinguished from classical HER2-positive breast cancers when assessing HER2 FISH, and a larger cohort of Group A patients should be included in further studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10406110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104061102023-08-08 Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing Bai, Qianming Lv, Hong Bao, Longlong Yang, Yu Zhang, Xin Chang, Heng Xue, Tian Ren, Min Zhu, Xiaoli Zhou, Xiaoyan Yang, Wentao Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Original Research PURPOSE: To investigate the HER2 status and clinicopathological features in invasive breast cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0, which has always been controversial. METHODS: Forty breast cancer cases with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were collected and classified into two groups based on the HRE2/CEP17 ratio (Group A: ≥2.0, n=22; Group B: <2.0, n=18). Clinicopathological characteristics, HER2 status, risk classification, and molecular typing were further analyzed and compared by 21-Gene expression assay and MammaPrint plus BluePrint test. RESULTS: The majority of cases in both groups were invasive carcinoma (NOS), with histological grade II, HR+, Ki-67 ≥20%, HER2 2+, and a high risk of recurrence, although younger patients and lymph node metastases were more common in Group A. Surprisingly, all HR+ breast cancers in both groups were classified as luminal-type, HR− cases were all basal-type or unknown, and the index of HER2 in all cases was <0.000 using the BluePrint test, which indicated that HER2 status should be negative. Furthermore, the level of HER2 mRNA expression in all cases of both groups was <10.7, which was defined as HER2 negative by the 21-Gene expression assay. In addition, 10 patients of Group A received anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy; only one patient with HR- achieved Grade 5 based on the Miller-Payne system, whereas none of the patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) based on the Residual Cancer Burden system. CONCLUSION: Group A breast cancer, which has always been unquestionably diagnosed as HER2 amplification, was more likely to be HER2 negative and derived less benefit from anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Group A breast cancer should be distinguished from classical HER2-positive breast cancers when assessing HER2 FISH, and a larger cohort of Group A patients should be included in further studies. Dove 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10406110/ /pubmed/37554155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S420738 Text en © 2023 Bai et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bai, Qianming Lv, Hong Bao, Longlong Yang, Yu Zhang, Xin Chang, Heng Xue, Tian Ren, Min Zhu, Xiaoli Zhou, Xiaoyan Yang, Wentao Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing |
title | Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing |
title_full | Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing |
title_fullStr | Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing |
title_short | Invasive Breast Cancer with HER2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: Risk Classification and Molecular Typing by a 21-Gene Expression Assay and MammaPrint Plus BluePrint Testing |
title_sort | invasive breast cancer with her2 ≥4.0 and <6.0: risk classification and molecular typing by a 21-gene expression assay and mammaprint plus blueprint testing |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37554155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S420738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baiqianming invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting AT lvhong invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting AT baolonglong invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting AT yangyu invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting AT zhangxin invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting AT changheng invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting AT xuetian invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting AT renmin invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting AT zhuxiaoli invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting AT zhouxiaoyan invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting AT yangwentao invasivebreastcancerwithher240and60riskclassificationandmoleculartypingbya21geneexpressionassayandmammaprintplusblueprinttesting |