Cargando…

Effects of participation in interdisciplinary rounds in the intensive care unit on family satisfaction: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether family participation in intensive care unit interdisciplinary bedside rounds affects family satisfaction. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a 56-bed, adult, mixed intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Southern Brazil. From May to June 2019, f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schneider, Daniel, Rosa, Regis Goulart, dos Santos, Rosa da Rosa Minho, Fogazzi, Débora Vaccaro, Rech, Gabriela Soares, da Silva, Daiana Barbosa, Terres, Mellina da Silva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37712810
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/2965-2774.20230274-en
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether family participation in intensive care unit interdisciplinary bedside rounds affects family satisfaction. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a 56-bed, adult, mixed intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Southern Brazil. From May to June 2019, family members of patients who stayed in the intensive care unit for at least 48 hours were invited to participate in the study at the time of patient discharge. The main exposure variable was participation in intensive care unit bedside rounds during the intensive care unit stay. Family satisfaction was assessed by using the Brazilian version of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 234 screened individuals, 118 were included. Eleven participants withdrew consent. A total of 107 individuals were assessed; 58 (54%) reported being present during bedside rounds, and 49 (46%) reported never being present. General satisfaction and satisfaction with the decision-making process were higher among families who were present during rounds than among families who were not (p = 0.01 and p = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSION: The presence during interdisciplinary rounds was associated with improved general satisfaction and satisfaction with the decision-making aspect. This outcome indicates that efforts must be directed to conduct studies with more robust methodologies to confirm this association.