Cargando…

Validity and feasibility of using a seated push-up test among community-dwelling older adults

BACKGROUND: Older individuals face a high risk of mobility and body composition decline, which can affect their independence. In light of a current uncertain healthcare situation created by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare paradigm has been shifted with increased demand for a practica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poncumhak, Puttipong, Phadungkit, Supaporn, Chokphukiao, Pakwipa, Intaruk, Roongnapa, Amatachaya, Pipatana, Amatachaya, Sugalya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: World Scientific Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1013702522500123
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Older individuals face a high risk of mobility and body composition decline, which can affect their independence. In light of a current uncertain healthcare situation created by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare paradigm has been shifted with increased demand for a practical measure to promote standard home healthcare services for all individuals, including older adults. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the feasibility and validity of seated push-up tests (SPUTs) as clinical measures to reflect the body composition, muscle strength, and mobility among community-dwelling older individuals, aged [Formula: see text] years ([Formula: see text]). METHODS: Participants were cross-sectionally assessed using SPUTs with various demanding forms, including the 1-time SPUT (1SPUT) along with its upper limb loading SPUT (ULL-SPUT), 5-time SPUT (5SPUT), 10-time SPUT (10SPUT), and 1-min SPUT (1minSPUT) and standard measures. RESULTS: Participants who passed and failed a 1SPUT showed significant differences in the outcomes of all standard measures ([Formula: see text]). The ULL-SPUT significantly correlated to all body composition, muscle strength, and mobility ([Formula: see text] –0.785; [Formula: see text]). Outcomes of 1minSPUT significantly correlated with muscle strength and mobility outcomes ([Formula: see text] –0.526; [Formula: see text]). Participants reported no adverse effects following the SPUTs. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest the use of the 1SPUT, ULL-SPUT, and 1minSPUT as practical measures to reflect the body composition, muscle strength, and mobility of older individuals, according to their functional levels. The tests may especially clinically benefit those with lower limb limitations and those in settings with limited space and equipment.