Cargando…
The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review
BACKGROUND: Rare diseases negatively impact patients’ quality of life, but the estimation of health state utility values (HSUVs) in research studies and cost–utility models for health technology assessment is challenging. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the methods for estimating the HSUVs included...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01541-y |
_version_ | 1785085793574846464 |
---|---|
author | Meregaglia, Michela Nicod, Elena Drummond, Michael |
author_facet | Meregaglia, Michela Nicod, Elena Drummond, Michael |
author_sort | Meregaglia, Michela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rare diseases negatively impact patients’ quality of life, but the estimation of health state utility values (HSUVs) in research studies and cost–utility models for health technology assessment is challenging. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the methods for estimating the HSUVs included in manufacturers’ submissions of orphan drugs to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) with those of published studies addressing the same rare diseases to understand whether manufacturers fully exploited the existing literature in developing their economic models. METHODS: All NICE Technology Appraisal (TA) and Highly Specialized Technologies (HST) guidance documents of non-cancer European Medicines Agency (EMA) orphan medicinal products were reviewed and compared with any published primary studies, retrieved via PubMed until November 2020, and estimating HSUVs for the same conditions addressed in manufacturers’ submissions. RESULTS: We identified 22 NICE TA/HST appraisal reports addressing 19 different rare diseases. Sixteen reports presented original HSUVs estimated using EQ-5D or Health Utility Index (n = 12), direct methods (n = 2) or mapping (n = 2), while the other six included values obtained from the literature only. In parallel, we identified 111 published studies: 86.6% used preference-based measures (mainly EQ-5D, 60.7%), 12.5% direct techniques, and 2.7% mapping. The collection of values from non-patient populations (using ‘vignettes’) was more frequent in manufacturers’ submissions than in the literature (22.7% vs. 8.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The agreement on methodological choices between manufacturers’ submissions and published literature was only partial. More efforts should be made by manufacturers to accurately reflect the academic literature and its methodological recommendations in orphan drugs submissions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-022-01541-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10406664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104066642023-08-09 The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review Meregaglia, Michela Nicod, Elena Drummond, Michael Eur J Health Econ Original Paper BACKGROUND: Rare diseases negatively impact patients’ quality of life, but the estimation of health state utility values (HSUVs) in research studies and cost–utility models for health technology assessment is challenging. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the methods for estimating the HSUVs included in manufacturers’ submissions of orphan drugs to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) with those of published studies addressing the same rare diseases to understand whether manufacturers fully exploited the existing literature in developing their economic models. METHODS: All NICE Technology Appraisal (TA) and Highly Specialized Technologies (HST) guidance documents of non-cancer European Medicines Agency (EMA) orphan medicinal products were reviewed and compared with any published primary studies, retrieved via PubMed until November 2020, and estimating HSUVs for the same conditions addressed in manufacturers’ submissions. RESULTS: We identified 22 NICE TA/HST appraisal reports addressing 19 different rare diseases. Sixteen reports presented original HSUVs estimated using EQ-5D or Health Utility Index (n = 12), direct methods (n = 2) or mapping (n = 2), while the other six included values obtained from the literature only. In parallel, we identified 111 published studies: 86.6% used preference-based measures (mainly EQ-5D, 60.7%), 12.5% direct techniques, and 2.7% mapping. The collection of values from non-patient populations (using ‘vignettes’) was more frequent in manufacturers’ submissions than in the literature (22.7% vs. 8.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The agreement on methodological choices between manufacturers’ submissions and published literature was only partial. More efforts should be made by manufacturers to accurately reflect the academic literature and its methodological recommendations in orphan drugs submissions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-022-01541-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10406664/ /pubmed/36335234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01541-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Meregaglia, Michela Nicod, Elena Drummond, Michael The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review |
title | The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review |
title_full | The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review |
title_fullStr | The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review |
title_short | The estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for NICE technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? A scoping review |
title_sort | estimation of health state utility values in rare diseases: do the approaches in submissions for nice technology appraisals reflect the existing literature? a scoping review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36335234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01541-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meregagliamichela theestimationofhealthstateutilityvaluesinrarediseasesdotheapproachesinsubmissionsfornicetechnologyappraisalsreflecttheexistingliteratureascopingreview AT nicodelena theestimationofhealthstateutilityvaluesinrarediseasesdotheapproachesinsubmissionsfornicetechnologyappraisalsreflecttheexistingliteratureascopingreview AT drummondmichael theestimationofhealthstateutilityvaluesinrarediseasesdotheapproachesinsubmissionsfornicetechnologyappraisalsreflecttheexistingliteratureascopingreview AT meregagliamichela estimationofhealthstateutilityvaluesinrarediseasesdotheapproachesinsubmissionsfornicetechnologyappraisalsreflecttheexistingliteratureascopingreview AT nicodelena estimationofhealthstateutilityvaluesinrarediseasesdotheapproachesinsubmissionsfornicetechnologyappraisalsreflecttheexistingliteratureascopingreview AT drummondmichael estimationofhealthstateutilityvaluesinrarediseasesdotheapproachesinsubmissionsfornicetechnologyappraisalsreflecttheexistingliteratureascopingreview |