Cargando…
Three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment using the levator ani deficiency score in primiparas: A replication study
INTRODUCTION: It is essential to assess the levator ani properly as part of clinical care in patients presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction. The levator ani deficiency scoring system is a previously published method to assess levator ani defects with three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound. The...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37475151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14633 |
_version_ | 1785085858154545152 |
---|---|
author | Rotstein, Emilia Ullemar, Vilhelmina Starck, Marianne Tegerstedt, Gunilla |
author_facet | Rotstein, Emilia Ullemar, Vilhelmina Starck, Marianne Tegerstedt, Gunilla |
author_sort | Rotstein, Emilia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: It is essential to assess the levator ani properly as part of clinical care in patients presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction. The levator ani deficiency scoring system is a previously published method to assess levator ani defects with three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound. The primary aim of this study was to determine the intra‐ and interrater reliability of the levator ani deficiency score in a cohort of non‐instrumentally delivered primiparas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Primiparas (n = 141) were examined at least 1 year after vaginal birth. Three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound volumes were acquired by a single examiner using two different automated ultrasound probes. The volumes were analyzed by two separate raters who were blinded to each other's assessments. Descriptive statistics were calculated for levator ani deficiency score and categorized into three levels (mild, moderate, severe). Kendall's tau‐b was calculated for intra‐ and interrater comparisons. RESULTS: Intrarater comparisons of levator ani deficiency score and levator ani deficiency category were high (Kendall's tau‐b ≥0.80 for Rater 1; >0.79 for Rater 2). Interrater comparisons of levator ani deficiency score and levator ani deficiency category were also high (Kendall's tau‐b >0.9 for assessment 1 and >0.78 for assessment 2). Varying by rater, probe and assessment, 75.9%–80.1% of the study population had no/mild deficiency, 6.4%–9.2% had moderate deficiency, and 4.3%–6.4% had severe levator ani deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The levator ani deficiency scoring system is a feasible method to assess defects of the levator ani muscle and can be reproduced with high intra‐ and interrater correlations. Using the scoring system in clinical practice may facilitate concordant assessment between different examiners. However, the system should be used to support clinical findings and symptomatology and not as a screening tool, as the score is lacking the category of no levator ani deficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10407012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104070122023-08-09 Three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment using the levator ani deficiency score in primiparas: A replication study Rotstein, Emilia Ullemar, Vilhelmina Starck, Marianne Tegerstedt, Gunilla Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Uro Gynecology INTRODUCTION: It is essential to assess the levator ani properly as part of clinical care in patients presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction. The levator ani deficiency scoring system is a previously published method to assess levator ani defects with three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound. The primary aim of this study was to determine the intra‐ and interrater reliability of the levator ani deficiency score in a cohort of non‐instrumentally delivered primiparas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Primiparas (n = 141) were examined at least 1 year after vaginal birth. Three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound volumes were acquired by a single examiner using two different automated ultrasound probes. The volumes were analyzed by two separate raters who were blinded to each other's assessments. Descriptive statistics were calculated for levator ani deficiency score and categorized into three levels (mild, moderate, severe). Kendall's tau‐b was calculated for intra‐ and interrater comparisons. RESULTS: Intrarater comparisons of levator ani deficiency score and levator ani deficiency category were high (Kendall's tau‐b ≥0.80 for Rater 1; >0.79 for Rater 2). Interrater comparisons of levator ani deficiency score and levator ani deficiency category were also high (Kendall's tau‐b >0.9 for assessment 1 and >0.78 for assessment 2). Varying by rater, probe and assessment, 75.9%–80.1% of the study population had no/mild deficiency, 6.4%–9.2% had moderate deficiency, and 4.3%–6.4% had severe levator ani deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The levator ani deficiency scoring system is a feasible method to assess defects of the levator ani muscle and can be reproduced with high intra‐ and interrater correlations. Using the scoring system in clinical practice may facilitate concordant assessment between different examiners. However, the system should be used to support clinical findings and symptomatology and not as a screening tool, as the score is lacking the category of no levator ani deficiency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10407012/ /pubmed/37475151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14633 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Uro Gynecology Rotstein, Emilia Ullemar, Vilhelmina Starck, Marianne Tegerstedt, Gunilla Three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment using the levator ani deficiency score in primiparas: A replication study |
title | Three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment using the levator ani deficiency score in primiparas: A replication study |
title_full | Three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment using the levator ani deficiency score in primiparas: A replication study |
title_fullStr | Three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment using the levator ani deficiency score in primiparas: A replication study |
title_full_unstemmed | Three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment using the levator ani deficiency score in primiparas: A replication study |
title_short | Three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment using the levator ani deficiency score in primiparas: A replication study |
title_sort | three‐dimensional endovaginal ultrasound assessment using the levator ani deficiency score in primiparas: a replication study |
topic | Uro Gynecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37475151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rotsteinemilia threedimensionalendovaginalultrasoundassessmentusingthelevatoranideficiencyscoreinprimiparasareplicationstudy AT ullemarvilhelmina threedimensionalendovaginalultrasoundassessmentusingthelevatoranideficiencyscoreinprimiparasareplicationstudy AT starckmarianne threedimensionalendovaginalultrasoundassessmentusingthelevatoranideficiencyscoreinprimiparasareplicationstudy AT tegerstedtgunilla threedimensionalendovaginalultrasoundassessmentusingthelevatoranideficiencyscoreinprimiparasareplicationstudy |