Cargando…
Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
INTRODUCTION: Effects of daily iron supplementation in iron replete pregnancy are unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess benefits and harms of oral iron supplements in pregnant women without anemia and iron deficiency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We predefined and registered a protocol in PROSPER...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14607 |
_version_ | 1785085859137060864 |
---|---|
author | Hansen, Rebecka Sejer, Emilie P. F. Holm, Charlotte Schroll, Jeppe B. |
author_facet | Hansen, Rebecka Sejer, Emilie P. F. Holm, Charlotte Schroll, Jeppe B. |
author_sort | Hansen, Rebecka |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Effects of daily iron supplementation in iron replete pregnancy are unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess benefits and harms of oral iron supplements in pregnant women without anemia and iron deficiency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We predefined and registered a protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42020186210) and performed the review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing daily oral iron supplementation with no iron supplements in non‐anemic iron replete pregnant women. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE (by PubMed), EMBASE (by OVID), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 2022 without language restrictions. Two authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2). One author read full‐texts, assessed certainty of evidence by GRADE and conducted meta‐analyses using a random‐effects model. Primary outcomes included iron deficiency anemia, iron deficiency, hemoglobin >130 g/L, elevated iron status, small for gestational age newborns, low birthweight newborns, preterm birth, and congenital anomalies. RESULTS: Eight RCTs (2822 women) but no observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Daily oral iron supplementation in pregnancy probably reduces iron deficiency anemia at term (risk ratio [RR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38–0.70; 4 RCTs, 1670 women; I (2) = 13%; moderate‐certainty evidence) and the incidence of low birthweight babies (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.68; 2 RCTs, 361 infants; I (2) = 0%; moderate‐certainty evidence). In addition, it may reduce iron deficiency at term (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60–0.92; 4 RCTs, 1663 women; I (2) = 58%; low‐certainty evidence) and the incidence of small for gestational age babies (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17–0.86; 1 RCT, 213 infants; I (2) not estimable; low‐certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Daily iron supplementation in iron replete non‐anemic pregnant women probably reduces the risk of maternal iron deficiency anemia at term and low birthweight. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10407016 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104070162023-08-09 Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Hansen, Rebecka Sejer, Emilie P. F. Holm, Charlotte Schroll, Jeppe B. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Systematic Reviews INTRODUCTION: Effects of daily iron supplementation in iron replete pregnancy are unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess benefits and harms of oral iron supplements in pregnant women without anemia and iron deficiency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We predefined and registered a protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42020186210) and performed the review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing daily oral iron supplementation with no iron supplements in non‐anemic iron replete pregnant women. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE (by PubMed), EMBASE (by OVID), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 2022 without language restrictions. Two authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2). One author read full‐texts, assessed certainty of evidence by GRADE and conducted meta‐analyses using a random‐effects model. Primary outcomes included iron deficiency anemia, iron deficiency, hemoglobin >130 g/L, elevated iron status, small for gestational age newborns, low birthweight newborns, preterm birth, and congenital anomalies. RESULTS: Eight RCTs (2822 women) but no observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Daily oral iron supplementation in pregnancy probably reduces iron deficiency anemia at term (risk ratio [RR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38–0.70; 4 RCTs, 1670 women; I (2) = 13%; moderate‐certainty evidence) and the incidence of low birthweight babies (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.68; 2 RCTs, 361 infants; I (2) = 0%; moderate‐certainty evidence). In addition, it may reduce iron deficiency at term (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60–0.92; 4 RCTs, 1663 women; I (2) = 58%; low‐certainty evidence) and the incidence of small for gestational age babies (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17–0.86; 1 RCT, 213 infants; I (2) not estimable; low‐certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Daily iron supplementation in iron replete non‐anemic pregnant women probably reduces the risk of maternal iron deficiency anemia at term and low birthweight. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10407016/ /pubmed/37403900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14607 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Hansen, Rebecka Sejer, Emilie P. F. Holm, Charlotte Schroll, Jeppe B. Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14607 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansenrebecka ironsupplementsinpregnantwomenwithnormalironstatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sejeremiliepf ironsupplementsinpregnantwomenwithnormalironstatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT holmcharlotte ironsupplementsinpregnantwomenwithnormalironstatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT schrolljeppeb ironsupplementsinpregnantwomenwithnormalironstatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |