Cargando…

Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

INTRODUCTION: Effects of daily iron supplementation in iron replete pregnancy are unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess benefits and harms of oral iron supplements in pregnant women without anemia and iron deficiency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We predefined and registered a protocol in PROSPER...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Rebecka, Sejer, Emilie P. F., Holm, Charlotte, Schroll, Jeppe B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14607
_version_ 1785085859137060864
author Hansen, Rebecka
Sejer, Emilie P. F.
Holm, Charlotte
Schroll, Jeppe B.
author_facet Hansen, Rebecka
Sejer, Emilie P. F.
Holm, Charlotte
Schroll, Jeppe B.
author_sort Hansen, Rebecka
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Effects of daily iron supplementation in iron replete pregnancy are unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess benefits and harms of oral iron supplements in pregnant women without anemia and iron deficiency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We predefined and registered a protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42020186210) and performed the review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing daily oral iron supplementation with no iron supplements in non‐anemic iron replete pregnant women. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE (by PubMed), EMBASE (by OVID), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 2022 without language restrictions. Two authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2). One author read full‐texts, assessed certainty of evidence by GRADE and conducted meta‐analyses using a random‐effects model. Primary outcomes included iron deficiency anemia, iron deficiency, hemoglobin >130 g/L, elevated iron status, small for gestational age newborns, low birthweight newborns, preterm birth, and congenital anomalies. RESULTS: Eight RCTs (2822 women) but no observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Daily oral iron supplementation in pregnancy probably reduces iron deficiency anemia at term (risk ratio [RR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38–0.70; 4 RCTs, 1670 women; I (2) = 13%; moderate‐certainty evidence) and the incidence of low birthweight babies (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.68; 2 RCTs, 361 infants; I (2) = 0%; moderate‐certainty evidence). In addition, it may reduce iron deficiency at term (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60–0.92; 4 RCTs, 1663 women; I (2) = 58%; low‐certainty evidence) and the incidence of small for gestational age babies (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17–0.86; 1 RCT, 213 infants; I (2) not estimable; low‐certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Daily iron supplementation in iron replete non‐anemic pregnant women probably reduces the risk of maternal iron deficiency anemia at term and low birthweight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10407016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104070162023-08-09 Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Hansen, Rebecka Sejer, Emilie P. F. Holm, Charlotte Schroll, Jeppe B. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Systematic Reviews INTRODUCTION: Effects of daily iron supplementation in iron replete pregnancy are unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess benefits and harms of oral iron supplements in pregnant women without anemia and iron deficiency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We predefined and registered a protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42020186210) and performed the review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing daily oral iron supplementation with no iron supplements in non‐anemic iron replete pregnant women. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE (by PubMed), EMBASE (by OVID), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 2022 without language restrictions. Two authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2). One author read full‐texts, assessed certainty of evidence by GRADE and conducted meta‐analyses using a random‐effects model. Primary outcomes included iron deficiency anemia, iron deficiency, hemoglobin >130 g/L, elevated iron status, small for gestational age newborns, low birthweight newborns, preterm birth, and congenital anomalies. RESULTS: Eight RCTs (2822 women) but no observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Daily oral iron supplementation in pregnancy probably reduces iron deficiency anemia at term (risk ratio [RR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38–0.70; 4 RCTs, 1670 women; I (2) = 13%; moderate‐certainty evidence) and the incidence of low birthweight babies (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.68; 2 RCTs, 361 infants; I (2) = 0%; moderate‐certainty evidence). In addition, it may reduce iron deficiency at term (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60–0.92; 4 RCTs, 1663 women; I (2) = 58%; low‐certainty evidence) and the incidence of small for gestational age babies (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17–0.86; 1 RCT, 213 infants; I (2) not estimable; low‐certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Daily iron supplementation in iron replete non‐anemic pregnant women probably reduces the risk of maternal iron deficiency anemia at term and low birthweight. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10407016/ /pubmed/37403900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14607 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Hansen, Rebecka
Sejer, Emilie P. F.
Holm, Charlotte
Schroll, Jeppe B.
Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37403900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14607
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenrebecka ironsupplementsinpregnantwomenwithnormalironstatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sejeremiliepf ironsupplementsinpregnantwomenwithnormalironstatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT holmcharlotte ironsupplementsinpregnantwomenwithnormalironstatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schrolljeppeb ironsupplementsinpregnantwomenwithnormalironstatusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis