Cargando…

Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America

To achieve the Net Zero Carbon Emissions (NZCE) target by 2050, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is a major method. Gathering and injecting CO(2) into shale reservoirs is an effective way to reduce the CO(2) amount in the air and thus, release the greenhouse effect. CO(2) injection in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ni, Ruichong, Ling, Kegang, Afari, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18458
_version_ 1785085864429223936
author Ni, Ruichong
Ling, Kegang
Afari, Samuel
author_facet Ni, Ruichong
Ling, Kegang
Afari, Samuel
author_sort Ni, Ruichong
collection PubMed
description To achieve the Net Zero Carbon Emissions (NZCE) target by 2050, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is a major method. Gathering and injecting CO(2) into shale reservoirs is an effective way to reduce the CO(2) amount in the air and thus, release the greenhouse effect. CO(2) injection into organic-rich shales could provide dual benefits of incremental oil or gas recovery and secure CO(2) storage. When planning the CO(2) injection project, the most important question is how much gas could be stored in the reservoir. Methods for calculating CO(2) storage potential in shale reservoirs have been studied by many researchers. However, few researchers put those methods together and make comparisons to each other. This paper summarized five methods for evaluating CO(2) storage potential in five shale reservoirs by using the literature published in recent years. This paper aims to discuss and evaluate the technical aspects related to gas storage. Those geomechanical properties, petrophysical properties, and construction parameters were discussed. Among those parameters, CO(2) injection rate, skin factor, and Knudsen diffusion could significantly affect CO(2) storage potential evaluation results. Also, if well integrity, especially cement quality, and permeability could be taken into consideration, CO(2) storage simulation models' results will be more realistic. The significances of this study are: (1) served as guidance in calculating CO(2) storage capacity in shale oil plays; (2) provides analyses in evaluating nowadays methods’ limitations; (3) gives recommendations to researchers on how to improve those methods or create a new one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10407039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104070392023-08-09 Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America Ni, Ruichong Ling, Kegang Afari, Samuel Heliyon Review Article To achieve the Net Zero Carbon Emissions (NZCE) target by 2050, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is a major method. Gathering and injecting CO(2) into shale reservoirs is an effective way to reduce the CO(2) amount in the air and thus, release the greenhouse effect. CO(2) injection into organic-rich shales could provide dual benefits of incremental oil or gas recovery and secure CO(2) storage. When planning the CO(2) injection project, the most important question is how much gas could be stored in the reservoir. Methods for calculating CO(2) storage potential in shale reservoirs have been studied by many researchers. However, few researchers put those methods together and make comparisons to each other. This paper summarized five methods for evaluating CO(2) storage potential in five shale reservoirs by using the literature published in recent years. This paper aims to discuss and evaluate the technical aspects related to gas storage. Those geomechanical properties, petrophysical properties, and construction parameters were discussed. Among those parameters, CO(2) injection rate, skin factor, and Knudsen diffusion could significantly affect CO(2) storage potential evaluation results. Also, if well integrity, especially cement quality, and permeability could be taken into consideration, CO(2) storage simulation models' results will be more realistic. The significances of this study are: (1) served as guidance in calculating CO(2) storage capacity in shale oil plays; (2) provides analyses in evaluating nowadays methods’ limitations; (3) gives recommendations to researchers on how to improve those methods or create a new one. Elsevier 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10407039/ /pubmed/37560675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18458 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Ni, Ruichong
Ling, Kegang
Afari, Samuel
Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America
title Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America
title_full Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America
title_fullStr Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America
title_full_unstemmed Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America
title_short Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America
title_sort different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ co(2) storage potential in america
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18458
work_keys_str_mv AT niruichong differentwaystoapproachshalereservoirsco2storagepotentialinamerica
AT lingkegang differentwaystoapproachshalereservoirsco2storagepotentialinamerica
AT afarisamuel differentwaystoapproachshalereservoirsco2storagepotentialinamerica