Cargando…
Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America
To achieve the Net Zero Carbon Emissions (NZCE) target by 2050, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is a major method. Gathering and injecting CO(2) into shale reservoirs is an effective way to reduce the CO(2) amount in the air and thus, release the greenhouse effect. CO(2) injection in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18458 |
_version_ | 1785085864429223936 |
---|---|
author | Ni, Ruichong Ling, Kegang Afari, Samuel |
author_facet | Ni, Ruichong Ling, Kegang Afari, Samuel |
author_sort | Ni, Ruichong |
collection | PubMed |
description | To achieve the Net Zero Carbon Emissions (NZCE) target by 2050, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is a major method. Gathering and injecting CO(2) into shale reservoirs is an effective way to reduce the CO(2) amount in the air and thus, release the greenhouse effect. CO(2) injection into organic-rich shales could provide dual benefits of incremental oil or gas recovery and secure CO(2) storage. When planning the CO(2) injection project, the most important question is how much gas could be stored in the reservoir. Methods for calculating CO(2) storage potential in shale reservoirs have been studied by many researchers. However, few researchers put those methods together and make comparisons to each other. This paper summarized five methods for evaluating CO(2) storage potential in five shale reservoirs by using the literature published in recent years. This paper aims to discuss and evaluate the technical aspects related to gas storage. Those geomechanical properties, petrophysical properties, and construction parameters were discussed. Among those parameters, CO(2) injection rate, skin factor, and Knudsen diffusion could significantly affect CO(2) storage potential evaluation results. Also, if well integrity, especially cement quality, and permeability could be taken into consideration, CO(2) storage simulation models' results will be more realistic. The significances of this study are: (1) served as guidance in calculating CO(2) storage capacity in shale oil plays; (2) provides analyses in evaluating nowadays methods’ limitations; (3) gives recommendations to researchers on how to improve those methods or create a new one. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10407039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104070392023-08-09 Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America Ni, Ruichong Ling, Kegang Afari, Samuel Heliyon Review Article To achieve the Net Zero Carbon Emissions (NZCE) target by 2050, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) is a major method. Gathering and injecting CO(2) into shale reservoirs is an effective way to reduce the CO(2) amount in the air and thus, release the greenhouse effect. CO(2) injection into organic-rich shales could provide dual benefits of incremental oil or gas recovery and secure CO(2) storage. When planning the CO(2) injection project, the most important question is how much gas could be stored in the reservoir. Methods for calculating CO(2) storage potential in shale reservoirs have been studied by many researchers. However, few researchers put those methods together and make comparisons to each other. This paper summarized five methods for evaluating CO(2) storage potential in five shale reservoirs by using the literature published in recent years. This paper aims to discuss and evaluate the technical aspects related to gas storage. Those geomechanical properties, petrophysical properties, and construction parameters were discussed. Among those parameters, CO(2) injection rate, skin factor, and Knudsen diffusion could significantly affect CO(2) storage potential evaluation results. Also, if well integrity, especially cement quality, and permeability could be taken into consideration, CO(2) storage simulation models' results will be more realistic. The significances of this study are: (1) served as guidance in calculating CO(2) storage capacity in shale oil plays; (2) provides analyses in evaluating nowadays methods’ limitations; (3) gives recommendations to researchers on how to improve those methods or create a new one. Elsevier 2023-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10407039/ /pubmed/37560675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18458 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ni, Ruichong Ling, Kegang Afari, Samuel Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America |
title | Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America |
title_full | Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America |
title_fullStr | Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America |
title_full_unstemmed | Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America |
title_short | Different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ CO(2) storage potential in America |
title_sort | different ways to approach shale reservoirs’ co(2) storage potential in america |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18458 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niruichong differentwaystoapproachshalereservoirsco2storagepotentialinamerica AT lingkegang differentwaystoapproachshalereservoirsco2storagepotentialinamerica AT afarisamuel differentwaystoapproachshalereservoirsco2storagepotentialinamerica |