Cargando…

Validity of MENARI plus (self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high‐risk population

BACKGROUND: Even before it is clinically diagnosed, atrial fibrillation (AF) can cause a stroke. This study validates self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring (MENARI Plus) based on android apps. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of AF screening using MENARI Plus compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadlan, Muhamad R., Rizal, Ardian, Satrijo, Budi, Astiawati, Tri, Rohman, Mohammad S., Baskoro, Shalahuddin S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12863
_version_ 1785085899310104576
author Fadlan, Muhamad R.
Rizal, Ardian
Satrijo, Budi
Astiawati, Tri
Rohman, Mohammad S.
Baskoro, Shalahuddin S.
author_facet Fadlan, Muhamad R.
Rizal, Ardian
Satrijo, Budi
Astiawati, Tri
Rohman, Mohammad S.
Baskoro, Shalahuddin S.
author_sort Fadlan, Muhamad R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Even before it is clinically diagnosed, atrial fibrillation (AF) can cause a stroke. This study validates self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring (MENARI Plus) based on android apps. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of AF screening using MENARI Plus compared with an ECG recording. METHODS: We collected a total of 1385 subjects from high‐risk population according to CHA2DS2‐VASc score ≥2, attending 8 primary care centers (PCCs) in Malang between July 2021 and December 2021. Every participant underwent self‐pulse assessment, and then was evaluated for MENARI Plus Score on android Apps. These cases had been classified as low or high probability for AF (cut‐off score 7). After that, electrocardiography examinations were performed and classified with AF and Sinus Rhythm group. RESULTS: In this study, the mean age of these patients was 61.5 ± 6.9 years old. We found that 156/1385 (11%) patients had AF. There were 68/156 (43.5%) new cases of AF. The sensitivity for self‐pulse palpation was 73.1% (95% CI: 68%–76%) and specificity was 68.3% (95% CI: 65%–72%). MENARI Plus had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82–0.89) with sensitivity per measurement occasion was (84%, 95% CI: 82%–88%) and specificity was (87.9%, 95% CI: 82%–90%). CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that MENARI Plus has high sensitivity and specificity for AF. It is therefore useful for ruling out AF. It may also be a useful screen that can be applied opportunistically for previously undetected AFs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10407179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104071792023-08-09 Validity of MENARI plus (self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high‐risk population Fadlan, Muhamad R. Rizal, Ardian Satrijo, Budi Astiawati, Tri Rohman, Mohammad S. Baskoro, Shalahuddin S. J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Even before it is clinically diagnosed, atrial fibrillation (AF) can cause a stroke. This study validates self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring (MENARI Plus) based on android apps. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the validity of AF screening using MENARI Plus compared with an ECG recording. METHODS: We collected a total of 1385 subjects from high‐risk population according to CHA2DS2‐VASc score ≥2, attending 8 primary care centers (PCCs) in Malang between July 2021 and December 2021. Every participant underwent self‐pulse assessment, and then was evaluated for MENARI Plus Score on android Apps. These cases had been classified as low or high probability for AF (cut‐off score 7). After that, electrocardiography examinations were performed and classified with AF and Sinus Rhythm group. RESULTS: In this study, the mean age of these patients was 61.5 ± 6.9 years old. We found that 156/1385 (11%) patients had AF. There were 68/156 (43.5%) new cases of AF. The sensitivity for self‐pulse palpation was 73.1% (95% CI: 68%–76%) and specificity was 68.3% (95% CI: 65%–72%). MENARI Plus had an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82–0.89) with sensitivity per measurement occasion was (84%, 95% CI: 82%–88%) and specificity was (87.9%, 95% CI: 82%–90%). CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that MENARI Plus has high sensitivity and specificity for AF. It is therefore useful for ruling out AF. It may also be a useful screen that can be applied opportunistically for previously undetected AFs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10407179/ /pubmed/37560267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12863 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fadlan, Muhamad R.
Rizal, Ardian
Satrijo, Budi
Astiawati, Tri
Rohman, Mohammad S.
Baskoro, Shalahuddin S.
Validity of MENARI plus (self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high‐risk population
title Validity of MENARI plus (self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high‐risk population
title_full Validity of MENARI plus (self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high‐risk population
title_fullStr Validity of MENARI plus (self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high‐risk population
title_full_unstemmed Validity of MENARI plus (self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high‐risk population
title_short Validity of MENARI plus (self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high‐risk population
title_sort validity of menari plus (self‐pulse assessment and clinical scoring) mobile apps for detecting atrial fibrillation in high‐risk population
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12863
work_keys_str_mv AT fadlanmuhamadr validityofmenariplusselfpulseassessmentandclinicalscoringmobileappsfordetectingatrialfibrillationinhighriskpopulation
AT rizalardian validityofmenariplusselfpulseassessmentandclinicalscoringmobileappsfordetectingatrialfibrillationinhighriskpopulation
AT satrijobudi validityofmenariplusselfpulseassessmentandclinicalscoringmobileappsfordetectingatrialfibrillationinhighriskpopulation
AT astiawatitri validityofmenariplusselfpulseassessmentandclinicalscoringmobileappsfordetectingatrialfibrillationinhighriskpopulation
AT rohmanmohammads validityofmenariplusselfpulseassessmentandclinicalscoringmobileappsfordetectingatrialfibrillationinhighriskpopulation
AT baskoroshalahuddins validityofmenariplusselfpulseassessmentandclinicalscoringmobileappsfordetectingatrialfibrillationinhighriskpopulation