Cargando…

Transversal Survey of Emergency Medicine Policy and Quality Metrics in Japan’s Regional Health Care Plans

INTRODUCTION: It is essential to establish appropriate medical quality metrics and make improvements to safely and efficiently deliver optimum emergency medical services. The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) recommends prefectures to establish numerical quality metrics in their regional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iida, Atsuyoshi, Saito, Shinya, Hamada, Jun, Nakamura, Shunsuke, Nojima, Tsuyoshi, Naito, Hiromichi, Mikane, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560366
http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2022-0172
_version_ 1785085928008581120
author Iida, Atsuyoshi
Saito, Shinya
Hamada, Jun
Nakamura, Shunsuke
Nojima, Tsuyoshi
Naito, Hiromichi
Mikane, Takeshi
author_facet Iida, Atsuyoshi
Saito, Shinya
Hamada, Jun
Nakamura, Shunsuke
Nojima, Tsuyoshi
Naito, Hiromichi
Mikane, Takeshi
author_sort Iida, Atsuyoshi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: It is essential to establish appropriate medical quality metrics and make improvements to safely and efficiently deliver optimum emergency medical services. The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) recommends prefectures to establish numerical quality metrics in their regional healthcare plans (RHCP). The 7th RHCP was issued by the MHLW in 2017 along with a notice of planning in covering the six-year period from 2018 to 2023. In this descriptive study, the emergency medicine policies in the 7th RHCP of each prefecture were analyzed from a quality improvement perspective. METHOD: The authors examined the chapters on emergency medicine in the RHCPs of 47 prefectural governments for the overall structure, cost-benefits, and connection to community-based integrated care systems. The type and number of clinical measures listed as numerical metrics and their classification methods were emphasized. RESULT: Regarding the overall plan structure, 40 prefectural governments began their description with an analysis of current surroundings. In total, 24 prefectural governments mentioned community-based integrated care systems but none mentioned cost-benefit analysis. Altogether, only 43 of 47 prefectural governments (91%) indicated numerical metrics. The maximum number of numerical targets for quality measures by prefecture was 19, the minimum was 0, and the median was 4 (IQR: 3-6.5); there were 220 metrics in total, with 82 structural, 96 process, and 42 outcome measures. Additionally, 13 prefectures (28%) classified quality measures according to the MHLW’s guidance, 6 (13%) used their own classification manner, while the others did not classify their measures. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in emergency medicine policies and quality metrics among the prefectural governments. Further research is needed to develop and establish more comprehensive and appropriate metrics based on a common methodology to improve the quality of emergency medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10407299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Japan Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104072992023-08-09 Transversal Survey of Emergency Medicine Policy and Quality Metrics in Japan’s Regional Health Care Plans Iida, Atsuyoshi Saito, Shinya Hamada, Jun Nakamura, Shunsuke Nojima, Tsuyoshi Naito, Hiromichi Mikane, Takeshi JMA J Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: It is essential to establish appropriate medical quality metrics and make improvements to safely and efficiently deliver optimum emergency medical services. The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) recommends prefectures to establish numerical quality metrics in their regional healthcare plans (RHCP). The 7th RHCP was issued by the MHLW in 2017 along with a notice of planning in covering the six-year period from 2018 to 2023. In this descriptive study, the emergency medicine policies in the 7th RHCP of each prefecture were analyzed from a quality improvement perspective. METHOD: The authors examined the chapters on emergency medicine in the RHCPs of 47 prefectural governments for the overall structure, cost-benefits, and connection to community-based integrated care systems. The type and number of clinical measures listed as numerical metrics and their classification methods were emphasized. RESULT: Regarding the overall plan structure, 40 prefectural governments began their description with an analysis of current surroundings. In total, 24 prefectural governments mentioned community-based integrated care systems but none mentioned cost-benefit analysis. Altogether, only 43 of 47 prefectural governments (91%) indicated numerical metrics. The maximum number of numerical targets for quality measures by prefecture was 19, the minimum was 0, and the median was 4 (IQR: 3-6.5); there were 220 metrics in total, with 82 structural, 96 process, and 42 outcome measures. Additionally, 13 prefectures (28%) classified quality measures according to the MHLW’s guidance, 6 (13%) used their own classification manner, while the others did not classify their measures. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant differences in emergency medicine policies and quality metrics among the prefectural governments. Further research is needed to develop and establish more comprehensive and appropriate metrics based on a common methodology to improve the quality of emergency medicine. Japan Medical Association 2023-05-22 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10407299/ /pubmed/37560366 http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2022-0172 Text en Copyright © Japan Medical Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/JMA Journal is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Iida, Atsuyoshi
Saito, Shinya
Hamada, Jun
Nakamura, Shunsuke
Nojima, Tsuyoshi
Naito, Hiromichi
Mikane, Takeshi
Transversal Survey of Emergency Medicine Policy and Quality Metrics in Japan’s Regional Health Care Plans
title Transversal Survey of Emergency Medicine Policy and Quality Metrics in Japan’s Regional Health Care Plans
title_full Transversal Survey of Emergency Medicine Policy and Quality Metrics in Japan’s Regional Health Care Plans
title_fullStr Transversal Survey of Emergency Medicine Policy and Quality Metrics in Japan’s Regional Health Care Plans
title_full_unstemmed Transversal Survey of Emergency Medicine Policy and Quality Metrics in Japan’s Regional Health Care Plans
title_short Transversal Survey of Emergency Medicine Policy and Quality Metrics in Japan’s Regional Health Care Plans
title_sort transversal survey of emergency medicine policy and quality metrics in japan’s regional health care plans
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560366
http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2022-0172
work_keys_str_mv AT iidaatsuyoshi transversalsurveyofemergencymedicinepolicyandqualitymetricsinjapansregionalhealthcareplans
AT saitoshinya transversalsurveyofemergencymedicinepolicyandqualitymetricsinjapansregionalhealthcareplans
AT hamadajun transversalsurveyofemergencymedicinepolicyandqualitymetricsinjapansregionalhealthcareplans
AT nakamurashunsuke transversalsurveyofemergencymedicinepolicyandqualitymetricsinjapansregionalhealthcareplans
AT nojimatsuyoshi transversalsurveyofemergencymedicinepolicyandqualitymetricsinjapansregionalhealthcareplans
AT naitohiromichi transversalsurveyofemergencymedicinepolicyandqualitymetricsinjapansregionalhealthcareplans
AT mikanetakeshi transversalsurveyofemergencymedicinepolicyandqualitymetricsinjapansregionalhealthcareplans