Cargando…

The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analogs are expected to reduce lymphatic leakage. However, whether they can be used after axillary lymphadenectomy is unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogs in axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer patients. METHODS: We perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirono, Satsuki, Watanabe, Jun, Miki, Atsushi, Shiozawa, Mikio, Sata, Naohiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japan Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560373
http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2022-0219
_version_ 1785085943712055296
author Hirono, Satsuki
Watanabe, Jun
Miki, Atsushi
Shiozawa, Mikio
Sata, Naohiro
author_facet Hirono, Satsuki
Watanabe, Jun
Miki, Atsushi
Shiozawa, Mikio
Sata, Naohiro
author_sort Hirono, Satsuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analogs are expected to reduce lymphatic leakage. However, whether they can be used after axillary lymphadenectomy is unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogs in axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer patients. METHODS: We performed a random-effects meta-analysis by searching electronic databases for randomized trials and trial registries until June 2022. The primary outcomes were the volume of drained fluid, the duration of drainage, and seroma incidence. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: Six trials (738 participants) and one protocol without results were included. Somatostatin analogs may reduce the volume of drained fluid (mean difference = −22.07 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −42.09 to −2.05; I(2) = 56%) while resulting in a slight-to-no difference in the duration of drainage (mean difference = −0.48 days, 95% CI = −1.43 to 0.46; I(2) = 87%) and seroma incidence (risk ratio = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.61-1.34; I(2) = 55%). The certainty of the evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: There was limited evidence supporting somatostatin analogs for lymphorrhea after axillary lymphadenectomy. Multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogs after axillary lymphadenectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10407358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Japan Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104073582023-08-09 The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Hirono, Satsuki Watanabe, Jun Miki, Atsushi Shiozawa, Mikio Sata, Naohiro JMA J Review Article BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analogs are expected to reduce lymphatic leakage. However, whether they can be used after axillary lymphadenectomy is unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogs in axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer patients. METHODS: We performed a random-effects meta-analysis by searching electronic databases for randomized trials and trial registries until June 2022. The primary outcomes were the volume of drained fluid, the duration of drainage, and seroma incidence. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: Six trials (738 participants) and one protocol without results were included. Somatostatin analogs may reduce the volume of drained fluid (mean difference = −22.07 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −42.09 to −2.05; I(2) = 56%) while resulting in a slight-to-no difference in the duration of drainage (mean difference = −0.48 days, 95% CI = −1.43 to 0.46; I(2) = 87%) and seroma incidence (risk ratio = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.61-1.34; I(2) = 55%). The certainty of the evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: There was limited evidence supporting somatostatin analogs for lymphorrhea after axillary lymphadenectomy. Multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogs after axillary lymphadenectomy. Japan Medical Association 2023-05-22 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10407358/ /pubmed/37560373 http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2022-0219 Text en Copyright © Japan Medical Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/JMA Journal is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Hirono, Satsuki
Watanabe, Jun
Miki, Atsushi
Shiozawa, Mikio
Sata, Naohiro
The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of somatostatin analog after axillary node dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560373
http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2022-0219
work_keys_str_mv AT hironosatsuki theefficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT watanabejun theefficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mikiatsushi theefficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shiozawamikio theefficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT satanaohiro theefficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hironosatsuki efficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT watanabejun efficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mikiatsushi efficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shiozawamikio efficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT satanaohiro efficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis