Cargando…
The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analogs are expected to reduce lymphatic leakage. However, whether they can be used after axillary lymphadenectomy is unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogs in axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer patients. METHODS: We perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japan Medical Association
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560373 http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2022-0219 |
_version_ | 1785085943712055296 |
---|---|
author | Hirono, Satsuki Watanabe, Jun Miki, Atsushi Shiozawa, Mikio Sata, Naohiro |
author_facet | Hirono, Satsuki Watanabe, Jun Miki, Atsushi Shiozawa, Mikio Sata, Naohiro |
author_sort | Hirono, Satsuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analogs are expected to reduce lymphatic leakage. However, whether they can be used after axillary lymphadenectomy is unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogs in axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer patients. METHODS: We performed a random-effects meta-analysis by searching electronic databases for randomized trials and trial registries until June 2022. The primary outcomes were the volume of drained fluid, the duration of drainage, and seroma incidence. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: Six trials (738 participants) and one protocol without results were included. Somatostatin analogs may reduce the volume of drained fluid (mean difference = −22.07 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −42.09 to −2.05; I(2) = 56%) while resulting in a slight-to-no difference in the duration of drainage (mean difference = −0.48 days, 95% CI = −1.43 to 0.46; I(2) = 87%) and seroma incidence (risk ratio = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.61-1.34; I(2) = 55%). The certainty of the evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: There was limited evidence supporting somatostatin analogs for lymphorrhea after axillary lymphadenectomy. Multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogs after axillary lymphadenectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10407358 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Japan Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104073582023-08-09 The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Hirono, Satsuki Watanabe, Jun Miki, Atsushi Shiozawa, Mikio Sata, Naohiro JMA J Review Article BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analogs are expected to reduce lymphatic leakage. However, whether they can be used after axillary lymphadenectomy is unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogs in axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer patients. METHODS: We performed a random-effects meta-analysis by searching electronic databases for randomized trials and trial registries until June 2022. The primary outcomes were the volume of drained fluid, the duration of drainage, and seroma incidence. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: Six trials (738 participants) and one protocol without results were included. Somatostatin analogs may reduce the volume of drained fluid (mean difference = −22.07 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −42.09 to −2.05; I(2) = 56%) while resulting in a slight-to-no difference in the duration of drainage (mean difference = −0.48 days, 95% CI = −1.43 to 0.46; I(2) = 87%) and seroma incidence (risk ratio = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.61-1.34; I(2) = 55%). The certainty of the evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: There was limited evidence supporting somatostatin analogs for lymphorrhea after axillary lymphadenectomy. Multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogs after axillary lymphadenectomy. Japan Medical Association 2023-05-22 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10407358/ /pubmed/37560373 http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2022-0219 Text en Copyright © Japan Medical Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/JMA Journal is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hirono, Satsuki Watanabe, Jun Miki, Atsushi Shiozawa, Mikio Sata, Naohiro The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | The Efficacy and Safety of Somatostatin Analog after Axillary Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of somatostatin analog after axillary node dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407358/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560373 http://dx.doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2022-0219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hironosatsuki theefficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT watanabejun theefficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mikiatsushi theefficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shiozawamikio theefficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT satanaohiro theefficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hironosatsuki efficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT watanabejun efficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mikiatsushi efficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shiozawamikio efficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT satanaohiro efficacyandsafetyofsomatostatinanalogafteraxillarynodedissectioninbreastcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |