Cargando…

Sealing effectiveness of a novel NHS-POx based patch: experiments in a dynamic ex vivo porcine lung

BACKGROUND: Sealants are used to prevent prolonged pulmonary air leakage (PAL) after lung resections (incidence 5.6–30%). However, clinical evidence to support sealant use is insufficient, with an unmet need for a more effective product. We compared a novel gelatin patch impregnated with functionali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hermans, Bob P., Li, Wilson W. L., Roozen, Edwin A., van Dort, Daniël I. M., Evers, Jort, van der Heijden, Erik H. F. M., van der Heide, Stefan M., van Goor, Harry, Verhagen, Ad F. T. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37559645
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1821
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Sealants are used to prevent prolonged pulmonary air leakage (PAL) after lung resections (incidence 5.6–30%). However, clinical evidence to support sealant use is insufficient, with an unmet need for a more effective product. We compared a novel gelatin patch impregnated with functionalized polyoxazolines (NHS-POx) (GATT-Patch) to commercially available sealant products. METHODS: GATT-Patch Single/Double layers were compared to Progel(®), Coseal(®), Hemopatch(®) and TachoSil(®) in an ex vivo porcine lung model (first experiment). Based on these results, a second head-to-head comparison between GATT-Patch Single and Hemopatch(®) was performed. Air leakage (AL) was assessed in three settings using increasing ventilatory pressures (max =70 cmH(2)O): (I) baseline, (II) with 25 mm × 25 mm superficial pleural defect, and (III) after sealant application. Lungs floating on saline (37 ℃) were video recorded for visual AL assessment. Pressure and tidal volumes were collected from the ventilator, and bursting pressure (BP), AL and AL-reduction were determined. RESULTS: Per sealant 10 measurements were performed (both experiments). In the first experiment, BP was superior for GATT-Patch Double (60±24 cmH(2)O) compared to TachoSil(®) (30±11 cmH(2)O, P<0.001), Hemopatch(®) (33±6 cmH(2)O, P=0.006), Coseal(®) (25±13 cmH(2)O, P=0.001) and Progel(®) (33±11 cmH(2)O, P=0.005). AL-reduction was superior for GATT-Patch Double (100%±1%) compared to Hemopatch(®) (46%±50%, P=0.010) and TachoSil(®) (31%±29%, P<0.001), and also for GATT-Patch Single (100%±14%, P=0.004) and Progel (89%±40%, P=0.027) compared to TachoSil(®). In the second experiment, GATT-Patch Single was superior regarding BP (45±10 vs. 40±6 cmH(2)O, P=0.043) and AL-reduction (100%±11% vs. 68%±40%, P=0.043) when compared to Hemopatch(®). CONCLUSIONS: The novel NHS-POx patch shows promise as a lung sealant, demonstrating elevated BP, good adhesive strength and a superior AL-reduction.