Cargando…

Application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcome of patients underwent anatomic periurethral reconstruction during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: During August 2016 to May 2018, periurethral structure anatomic reconstruction was performed during RARP in 58 co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Haichang, Lu, Dongning, Hu, Yuning, Mou, Yixuan, Zhang, Dahong, Liu, Zhenghong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1221217
_version_ 1785085989965791232
author Li, Haichang
Lu, Dongning
Hu, Yuning
Mou, Yixuan
Zhang, Dahong
Liu, Zhenghong
author_facet Li, Haichang
Lu, Dongning
Hu, Yuning
Mou, Yixuan
Zhang, Dahong
Liu, Zhenghong
author_sort Li, Haichang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcome of patients underwent anatomic periurethral reconstruction during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: During August 2016 to May 2018, periurethral structure anatomic reconstruction was performed during RARP in 58 consecutive patients. The control group consists of another 50 patients had no reconstruction procedure during RARP. Perioperative data of these patients were collected retrospectively, including operation time, anastomosis time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of indwelling catheter, length of hospital stay, complications, postoperative pathology, and continence outcome at 1,3,6 and 12 months. RESULTS: All cases were successfully performed without conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications.The percentage of patients maintain continence in the reconstruction group versus non-reconstruction group: At 1 month 84.5% (49/58)versus 70.0% (35/50), at 3 months 89.7% (52/58)versus 78.0% (39/50), at 6 months 91.3% (53/58)versus 86.0% (43/50) and 1 year after surgery 100.0% (58/58)versus 96.0% (48/50). Reconstruction group showed better continence outcome in 1 and 3 months (P<0.05). There is no statistical differences in 6 month and 1 year. CONCLUSION: Anatomic reconstruction of periurethral structure during RARP is safe and feasible with reduced duration of indwelling catheter and better continence outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10407552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104075522023-08-09 Application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Li, Haichang Lu, Dongning Hu, Yuning Mou, Yixuan Zhang, Dahong Liu, Zhenghong Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcome of patients underwent anatomic periurethral reconstruction during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: During August 2016 to May 2018, periurethral structure anatomic reconstruction was performed during RARP in 58 consecutive patients. The control group consists of another 50 patients had no reconstruction procedure during RARP. Perioperative data of these patients were collected retrospectively, including operation time, anastomosis time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of indwelling catheter, length of hospital stay, complications, postoperative pathology, and continence outcome at 1,3,6 and 12 months. RESULTS: All cases were successfully performed without conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications.The percentage of patients maintain continence in the reconstruction group versus non-reconstruction group: At 1 month 84.5% (49/58)versus 70.0% (35/50), at 3 months 89.7% (52/58)versus 78.0% (39/50), at 6 months 91.3% (53/58)versus 86.0% (43/50) and 1 year after surgery 100.0% (58/58)versus 96.0% (48/50). Reconstruction group showed better continence outcome in 1 and 3 months (P<0.05). There is no statistical differences in 6 month and 1 year. CONCLUSION: Anatomic reconstruction of periurethral structure during RARP is safe and feasible with reduced duration of indwelling catheter and better continence outcome. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10407552/ /pubmed/37560465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1221217 Text en Copyright © 2023 Li, Lu, Hu, Mou, Zhang and Liu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Li, Haichang
Lu, Dongning
Hu, Yuning
Mou, Yixuan
Zhang, Dahong
Liu, Zhenghong
Application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title Application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_full Application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_short Application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
title_sort application of anatomic reconstruction technique for periurethral structure in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37560465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1221217
work_keys_str_mv AT lihaichang applicationofanatomicreconstructiontechniqueforperiurethralstructureinroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT ludongning applicationofanatomicreconstructiontechniqueforperiurethralstructureinroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT huyuning applicationofanatomicreconstructiontechniqueforperiurethralstructureinroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT mouyixuan applicationofanatomicreconstructiontechniqueforperiurethralstructureinroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT zhangdahong applicationofanatomicreconstructiontechniqueforperiurethralstructureinroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy
AT liuzhenghong applicationofanatomicreconstructiontechniqueforperiurethralstructureinroboticassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomy